Australian Politics Forum - No historical mention of a ‘prophet’ called Muhamm

Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register

Forum rules, Recent posts (with text), RSS, Search options, Browse all uploaded images
Home, Articles, Green Tax Shift, Evolution,

Australian Politics Forum › Member Run Boards › Islam › No historical mention of a ‘prophet’ called Muhamm

(Moderator: polite_gandalf)

‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›

Pages: 1 2 3

No historical mention of a ‘prophet’ called Muhamm (Read 3487 times)

ordinaryguy Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 625 Gender:	Re: No historical mention of a ‘prophet’ called Muhamm Reply #30 - Sep 28^th, 2015 at 8:26pm Bottoms Up peccerpantsdown.
Back to top	IP Logged

Stratos

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 4725

Re: No historical mention of a ‘prophet’ called Muhamm
Reply #31 - Sep 28^th, 2015 at 8:38pm

Classic Liberal wrote on Mar 17^th, 2015 at 8:42pm:

Josephus makes two references to Jesus.

Classic Liberal wrote on Mar 17^th, 2015 at 8:42pm:

He was the Christ.

Look into the background of Josephus and you will see why most modern scholars believe this to have been added in later (the first mention of this passage was by a man named Eusebius who lived several centuries after)

Pete Waldo wrote on Jan 15^th, 2014 at 11:24pm:

Thus killing those Canaanite babies while they were still innocent, was a particularly merciful act

IP Logged

Pages: 1 2 3

‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›

« Forum

‹ Board

Top of this page