red baron wrote on Apr 15
th, 2015 at 4:04pm:
I hear what you're saying Freediver. This one is a bloody hard one. Do you really think we could stamp out ISIS in the Middle East?
Perhaps. Tends to hang on the question of how much blood you can tolerate being on your hands.
Quote:This is a religion and its gathering pace. But what is being chucked at them is a token effort at best.
Training the Iraqi soldiers to resist ISI is laughable. When ISIS turns up, the Iraqis will drop their weapons and turn like rabbits. No amount of training is going to turn those useless articles into soldiers, to start with they need ticker, an element missing from the Iraqi Army.
Except for the units which retook Mosul the other day. Forgotten their efforts? Then you have the Kurds, with their units which took Tikrit. Loads of hard slogging in both battles - as bad as Stalingrad, I've read.
Quote:If I felt that our soldiers would make a difference I could be swayed, but just like training the South Vietnamese Army it is destined to failure, why put our boys lives on the line for that result? All those Aussie lives lost in South Vietnam and for what? For nothing..the Commies won. I served in that conflict and I remember the history of it only too well.
Vietnam was a failure. No reason why Iraq has to be. The problem in both cases is getting the locals to care sufficiently to support the government. As long as the West keeps it's soldiers out of the battle and just supports the Iraqis, the better off they'll be at beating ISIS.