The debate ran for approximately 1hr 45min.

At the start of the debate the host told the audience to use the electronic polling controls they had been given to say if they agreed or disagreed with this statement.

Here's what the audience decided:




And then the debate proceeded for well over an hour.

The host then asked this audience to vote 'Yes' or 'No' to the question of whether they thought 'Islam is a religion of peace'.


The result now came out as:






What this highlights is that the fence-sitters out there in society are in dire need of an education on the subject of Islam.

Do the same debate in front of a muslim audience and make the title "Is judaism a religion of peace".

No guessing what the result will be

polite_gandalf wrote on Apr 30^th, 2015 at 3:21pm:


You know as well as I do that Islam does not allow for any sort of wriggle-room that deviates from the immutable Word of Allah as revealed through the prophet Mohammad (pbuh) ~ and therefore any other scriptural scenarios of a whimsical and 'interpretive' nature are invalid and redundant.

ISIS are in fact practicing True Islam to the letter. They are not a deviant minority ~ but are in fact conscientious exponents of the undiluted and faithful version of Islam as it was always intended to be.

What I found utterly appalling about the debate was that so many in the audience pressed the "I Haven't a bugger** Clue" button at the start of the debate.

Looking at the audience you could see they were a well-dressed, well-educated Middle Class lot ~ and not a bunch of undergraduate ignoramuses.

That shocked me. There's something wrong with America's news and information services that so many in the audience had not yet worked out the highly volatile nature of fundamentalist Islam.

The fact that so many of these adults found themselves better informed after viewing this debate for only a short time is testimony to the fact that a great many Americans are being kept in the dark about Islam's potential for destroying Western nations ~ that Newt Gingrich spoke so eloquently about not so long ago.

Sprintcyclist wrote on Apr 30^th, 2015 at 8:28pm:


No ~ it's a religion.

Call it a 'cult' - and the apologists will use that to say that the cult of Islamist brutality is something separate and distinct from True Islam.

We mustn't give them anywhere to hide.

Lord Herbert wrote on Apr 30^th, 2015 at 8:25pm:


You really do have problems when people state their true lack of knowledge about Islam, don't you, Herbie?   

Give us one thing worth knowing about Islam other than its justification of the murder of infidels. Of course if you are dead it will not be of much use. Try telling the Kenyans who their lost children recently. You people are such a bunch of liars.

issuevoter wrote on May 1^st, 2015 at 6:46am:


You shouldn't have any problem demonstrating our lies then...