polite_gandalf wrote on Aug 26^th, 2015 at 2:24pm:


Well, yes, but there's a new one:

Quote:

this is what the left would have of Aust .....

Quote:

|dev|null wrote on Aug 28^th, 2015 at 12:07pm:


there are no 'human rights'
that's feelgood lefty nonsense.
It is a fantasy

Sprintcyclist wrote on Aug 28^th, 2015 at 12:21pm:


So, you have no human rights Sprint? 

|dev|null wrote on Aug 28^th, 2015 at 12:52pm:


He certainly has the right to not be offended. He's been frightfully disturbed by the hommers lately.

I do feel it's caused psychological distress. The old boy needs to sue.

polite_gandalf wrote on Aug 29^th, 2015 at 8:11pm:


Could you explain what you mean about fake morals in this instance?

Human rights are a highly mutable concept, and certainly not innate,

polite_gandalf wrote on Aug 29^th, 2015 at 8:11pm:


Having fake morals must be akin to moslems claiming that;




Is that correct gandalf ?



Quote:

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/faith/article2409833.ece




.




IMAGE...





Quote:

Sheikh Yassir al-Burhami - an ISLAMIC scholar and Egyptian Salafi leader
http://www.raymondibrahim.com/from-the-arab-world/how-circumstance-dictates-isla...




.



Quote:
google




Google;
taqiyya - the muslim doctrine of deceit





.



Quote:
Google




.





Quote:
http://www.meforum.org/2512/nidal-hasan-fort-hood-muslim-doctrine




Google;
we smile to the face "while our hearts curse them"



.




gandalf,

QUESTION;
What is the best way for a naive infidel who is unfamiliar with the intricacies of ISLAM,      ....to tell a real moslem LIKE YOURSELF, from a moslem impersonator ?




IMAGE....








Islamic Protest - IN AUSTRALIA - on the streets of Sydney from Hyde Park to George Streets, September 15, 2012.

Further to K's reply...

Exhibit A: the front page of this website now has a moving dedication to Charlie Hebdo. This case was a good example of wishy washy liberal values and fake morals on display. Honestly the hypocricy on display by the French in the aftermath couldn't have been fabricated better: here we had French leaders walking down the street hand in hand with a selection of other western leaders - marching in solidarity for freedom of speech. At about the same time, French authorities were kicking down the door of a notorious French blogger, arresting him for saying some mean things about jews on facebook. I kid you not, this actually happened. France, moreover, has some of the most draconian anti-holocaust denial laws - that is, laws that literally amount to thought crimes. But lets be all outraged by the big bad muslim's attack on free speech.

But FD would never mention this hypocricy, nor would he even dream of accusing those French and other leaders of being cynical with this episode. Of course every right-minded person abhors and condemns violence of this kind, but we don't all get up on our moral pedastool and claim "solidarity" with those who profit from hate and racism. We'll ignore the inconvenient fact that before the attack on Charlie Hebdo, those same righteous French leaders were attempting to have the magazine shut down for incitement, as well as the fact that Charlie Hebdo itself had one of its cartoonists fired for caricaturing jews. Some lines, you see, must never be crossed - even by those warriors of freedom.

But FD's blind apologism for fake morals is not restricted to slain cartoonists. A year or so back when there was serious talk of banning the Islamist group Hizb-ut-tahrir - a group that rejects violence - far from condemning this dangerous attack on FOS, FD was here mocking the muslims who came out in support of them. Imagine that - people who are protesting against blatant censorship and blatant attack on free speech, ridiculed by the great freedom warrior himself. But that gem was possibly even topped a little earlier when he persisted for about 20 pages in denouncing a group of Egyptians protesting against the decidedly anti-democratic and anti-freedom overthrow of Egypt's first democratically elected government. Here we had a group of muslims in a sea of placards and banners saying "peace" and denouncing violence - once again mocked and ridiculed - because they were actually concealing their true motivation, oppression and anti-freedom of course. As is the FD way - of course he had no actual evidence for his charge, the proof was in what they didn't do: not being specific enough about their pro-peace credentials, including the fact that they only had one banner that indicated they were pro-democracy (a giant banner leading the march, but its still only one banner). And lets not get started on his "was it a line?" idiocy about the Oslo incident

You see the problem for FD here is that they are not charging into the streets to support the Charlie Hebdo's first - before they (cynically of course) conduct their "fake" freedom protests when it affects their own. This is another feature of FD's attacks: he holds muslims to a different standard than he holds ordinary non-muslims. For example, how many non-muslims actually came out on to the streets to condemn the Hebdo attack - in fact how many non-muslims ever come out en-masse to stand up for freedoms? Bugger all, thats how many. Yet in FD's mind, muslims should be the extraordinary ones - just because a few crazies commit atrocities using the name of the same religion they follow. But in reality, thats just an excuse. FD will never ever ever acknowledge muslims for doing the right thing in terms of supporting freedom. He has made this clear in his extraordinary mental gymnastics to turn muslim who do make that stand into something else entirely - even at the risk of making himself a complete parody of himself.