freediver wrote on Jul 3
rd, 2015 at 7:41pm:
It's a bit hard to tell if I 'inadvertently' misrepresented your position when you refuse to say what that position is.
Oh its easy FD, you see you don't have to know what my position is to know that what you claim I "suggested" is plain bollocks. I even spelled it out for you just a few minutes ago. Here I'll explain it to you again:
polite_gandalf wrote on Jun 10
th, 2014 at 1:54pm:
What we do know is that the sins of Lot's people was not sodomy per se - but the whole gamut of base, criminal behaviour that come with a complete moral breakdown - robbery, rape, murder etc, of which sodomy in that context came to symbolise.
refutes...
freediver wrote on Jun 27
th, 2015 at 10:38am:
Even Gandalf, and they do not get more progressive than him. He even suggested that Muhammed's command to kill gay people (both the giver and the receiver) should be limited to gays who flaunt their homosexuality, mardis gras style (eg 'the people of Lot').
Or if you disagree, then it should be easy for you to explain how "the gamut of base, criminal behaviour [such as] robbery, rape, murder etc" can be equated to 'mardi gras style'. Can you do that FD? Do you think you can address this now? Do you think I deserve an explanation after you so blatantly slandered me?