What the hell is wrong with these ethically and morally dysfunctional people? Is it a form of Al-Taqiyah?

Never a day goes by when we're not once again treated to a news story about Muslims ripping off the system.

First it was using their Islamic schools to launder massive millions of dollars worth of government subsidies to transfer to organisations outside of the schools system, and now it's 'Muslim Councils' that are being investigated for certain shenanigans.

"A Muslim representative group is to be investigated following allegations its leader was being unaccountable, while another leader has been accused of running a "dictatorship".

The ACT Government has said it would consider cancelling the registration of the Islamic Council of the ACT after an ABC investigation found the group may have failed to hold annual meetings for up to four years".

link

Lord Herbert wrote on Jun 27^th, 2015 at 10:50am:


I am amazed that you would quote the ABC website, Herbie.  Afterall, aren't they "traitous, left-wing, panty-twisters"?   

I find it commendable that they carry out such investigative journalism and whats more aren't afraid to post it to their website. Just goes to show, there are crooked Muslims, just as there are crooked Christians...

Lord Herbert wrote on Jun 27^th, 2015 at 10:50am:




Similarly, never a day goes by when we're not once again treated to a news story about non-Muslims ripping off the system.

What do you think that suggests, Herbie?

Lord Herbert wrote on Jun 27^th, 2015 at 10:50am:



Similarly, never a day goes by when we're not once again treated to a news story about non-Muslims ripping off the system.

What do you think that suggests, Herbie?

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 8^th, 2015 at 10:03am:


It suggests that Sydney's Muslim community of only 4.7% of the total Sydney population is breeding Australian-born young arseholes at the same pace as the 95.3% non-Muslim Sydney population.

Let's hear a few words from a professor, shall we?

"The trains in London and Madrid were not blown up by Christians or Buddhists but by Muslims, so it is them we have to beware of," he said.


"If you are on a collision course, what can you do? You can't put them all in prison, and anyway they are not all violent. You can't send them all back. You are really in trouble. It's irreversible."

Professor Israeli said that in Australia a few imams had preached violence. "You should not let fundamentalist imams come here. Screen them 1000 times before they are admitted, and after they are admitted screen what they say in the mosque.


"Professor Israeli said that in France, which has the highest proportion of Muslims in Europe at about 10 per cent, it was already too late. There were regions even the police were scared to enter, and militant Muslims were changing the country's political, economic and cultural fabric, and demanding anti-Semitic and anti-Israel policies.

"French people say they are strangers in their own country. This is a point of no return.

"Where there are large Muslim populations who are prepared to use violence you are in trouble. If there is only 1 or 2 per cent they don't dare to do it - they don't have the backing of big communities. They know they are drowned in the environment of non-Muslims and are better behaved."


Professor Israeli said that when the Muslim population increased, so did the risk of violence.

He said Muslim immigrants had a reputation for manipulating the values of Western countries, taking advantage of their hospitality and tolerance.

He said: "When the Muslim population gets to a critical mass you have problems. That is a general rule, so if it applies everywhere, it applies in Australia.

"LIFE can become untenable when the Muslim population of a non-Muslim country reaches about 10 per cent, as shown by France, a Jewish expert on Islam says.

Limit Muslim migration, Australia warned.

link

Brian Ross wrote on Jul 8^th, 2015 at 7:58pm:

So??

No Jew can have valid scholarly evidence?


You racist, eyerolling hypochtrite

Brian Ross wrote on Jul 9^th, 2015 at 12:08am:

Not ad hominem.

"You racist, eyerolling hypochtrite" is a relevant, personalised appraisal in response to your particular post.

Brian Ross wrote on Jul 8^th, 2015 at 7:58pm:


See this is an ad hominem, not arguing that which is presented but dismissing it because it is from a Jewish professor.

That is a text book example of an ad hominem.