Australian Politics Forum - Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Why won't Longy answer?
Reply #105 - Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 7:43pm

John Smith wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 7:38pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 7:07pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:53pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:39pm:

Incest is a far stronger prohibition than adolescent sex ...

So you keep saying, yet you can't explain why?

Could you explain it to me now, please?

really really simple... even for you. Incest has been a taboo in every age, .

someone should have told all the royals for the last 2000 odd yrs

cousins, not siblings. Although still awful and responsible for the mental midgets that have inherited the thrones of europe.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 139402
Gender: male

Why doesn't Longy answer questions?
Reply #106 - Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 7:47pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 7:41pm:

Quote:

So peoples like the americans are morality free since they support the death penalty?

I think you are confusing ethics with morality.

It is ethical for the state to not murder an innocent person found guilty by a not so perfect legal system.

I suggest the issue here is not that I don't understand the difference between the two, it's you who are confused.

As for adult brothers sodomising each other, it's not morality that covers this activity, it's the people involves, it's their ethical decision that decides.

again what is you aversion to heterosexual incest? you demand sexual equality the rest of the time so why is THIS different?

bet you cant/wont answer

The increased risk of genetic diseases.

Back to top

IP Logged

Secret Wars Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 3928 Gender:	Re: Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest Reply #107 - Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 7:48pm Just to interrupt the waltzing, peccary and greens are pro incest but wont say why, and longweekend is anti incest but won't say why not. Looks like a stalemate. And a win for slippery slopes.
Back to top	IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Why doesn't Longy answer questions?
Reply #108 - Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 7:53pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 7:47pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 7:41pm:

Quote:

So peoples like the americans are morality free since they support the death penalty?

I think you are confusing ethics with morality.

It is ethical for the state to not murder an innocent person found guilty by a not so perfect legal system.

I suggest the issue here is not that I don't understand the difference between the two, it's you who are confused.

As for adult brothers sodomising each other, it's not morality that covers this activity, it's the people involves, it's their ethical decision that decides.

again what is you aversion to heterosexual incest? you demand sexual equality the rest of the time so why is THIS different?

bet you cant/wont answer

The increased risk of genetic diseases.

firstly, that is an inadequate reason compared to getting AIDS from gay sex - which you support.

Secondly, you've never heard of birth control???

so where is your REAL objection to hetero incest since you support gay incest?

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 75137
Gender: male

Re: Why won't Longy answer?
Reply #109 - Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 7:53pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 7:43pm:

John Smith wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 7:38pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 7:07pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:53pm:

[quote author=longweekend58 link=1435884097/86#86 date=1435912788]Incest is a far stronger prohibition than adolescent sex ...

So you keep saying, yet you can't explain why?

Could you explain it to me now, please?

really really simple... even for you. Incest has been a taboo in every age, .

someone should have told all the royals for the last 2000 odd yrs

cousins, not siblings. Although still awful and responsible for the mental midgets that have inherited the

In Ancient Egypt the practice was not frowned upon and royalty would often marry members of their own family in a bid to preserve their royal lineage. In fact, historians believe that the practice was common in all classes of Egyptian society.

Nine of the 11 marriages that occurred over the dynasty's 200-year reign were consanguineous, with two uncle-niece marriages and one first-cousin marriage

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 139402
Gender: male

Longy wants to know why underage should be a probl
Reply #110 - Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 7:54pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 7:53pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 7:47pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 7:41pm:

Quote:

So peoples like the americans are morality free since they support the death penalty?

I think you are confusing ethics with morality.

It is ethical for the state to not murder an innocent person found guilty by a not so perfect legal system.

I suggest the issue here is not that I don't understand the difference between the two, it's you who are confused.

As for adult brothers sodomising each other, it's not morality that covers this activity, it's the people involves, it's their ethical decision that decides.

again what is you aversion to heterosexual incest? you demand sexual equality the rest of the time so why is THIS different?

bet you cant/wont answer

The increased risk of genetic diseases.

firstly, that is an inadequate reason ...

No, it's not.

Why do you oppose gay incest?

Back to top

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest
Reply #111 - Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 7:55pm

Secret Wars wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 7:48pm:

Just to interrupt the waltzing, peccary and greens are pro incest but wont say why, and longweekend is anti incest but won't say why not.

Looks like a stalemate.

And a win for slippery slopes.

except that I have all of human history and the law on my side. thats a significant advantage. And how many people would you ask that would NEED a detailed explanation to be anti-incest?

these two boofheads are on the side suggesting a change to millenia-old orthodoxy. They are the ones with the obligation to support their case.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 139402
Gender: male

Why is it illegal, Longy?
Reply #112 - Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 7:56pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 7:55pm:

Secret Wars wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 7:48pm:

Just to interrupt the waltzing, peccary and greens are pro incest but wont say why, and longweekend is anti incest but won't say why not.

Looks like a stalemate.

And a win for slippery slopes.

except that I have all of human history and the law on my side.

Why is it illegal?

Back to top

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Why won't Longy answer?
Reply #113 - Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 7:57pm

John Smith wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 7:53pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 7:43pm:

John Smith wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 7:38pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 7:07pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:53pm:

[quote author=longweekend58 link=1435884097/86#86 date=1435912788]Incest is a far stronger prohibition than adolescent sex ...

So you keep saying, yet you can't explain why?

Could you explain it to me now, please?

really really simple... even for you. Incest has been a taboo in every age, .

someone should have told all the royals for the last 2000 odd yrs

cousins, not siblings. Although still awful and responsible for the mental midgets that have inherited the

In Ancient Egypt the practice was not frowned upon and royalty would often marry members of their own family in a bid to preserve their royal lineage. In fact, historians believe that the practice was common in all classes of Egyptian society.

Nine of the 11 marriages that occurred over the dynasty's 200-year reign were consanguineous, with two uncle-niece marriages and one first-cousin marriage

15billion people have been born to this planet and you want to find 11 examples and think that is significant? especially when NONE of them were sibling such as being debated here?

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 38852
Gender: male

Re: Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest
Reply #114 - Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 7:57pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 7:55pm:

Secret Wars wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 7:48pm:

Just to interrupt the waltzing, peccary and greens are pro incest but wont say why, and longweekend is anti incest but won't say why not.

Looks like a stalemate.

And a win for slippery slopes.

except that I have all of human history and the law on my side. thats a significant advantage. And how many people would you ask that would NEED a detailed explanation to be anti-incest?

these two boofheads are on the side suggesting a change to millenia-old orthodoxy. They are the ones with the obligation to support their case.

I have not seen them say that at all. I have seen them ask you simple questions, and you doing all you can not to answer them.

Back to top

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: peccahead wants a brother... badly
Reply #115 - Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 7:59pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 7:54pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 7:53pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 7:47pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 7:41pm:

Quote:

So peoples like the americans are morality free since they support the death penalty?

I think you are confusing ethics with morality.

It is ethical for the state to not murder an innocent person found guilty by a not so perfect legal system.

I suggest the issue here is not that I don't understand the difference between the two, it's you who are confused.

As for adult brothers sodomising each other, it's not morality that covers this activity, it's the people involves, it's their ethical decision that decides.

again what is you aversion to heterosexual incest? you demand sexual equality the rest of the time so why is THIS different?

bet you cant/wont answer

The increased risk of genetic diseases.

firstly, that is an inadequate reason ...

No, it's not.

Why do you oppose gay incest?

it is completely inadequate since birth control is cheap easy and effective thus nullifying your opposition.

so what is wrong with hetero-incest in your paradigm of everything goes as long as you are over the arbitrarily and biologically flawed age of 18?

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

____

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 33410
Australia
Gender: male

Re: Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest
Reply #116 - Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 8:00pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 7:41pm:

Quote:

So peoples like the americans are morality free since they support the death penalty?

I think you are confusing ethics with morality.

It is ethical for the state to not murder an innocent person found guilty by a not so perfect legal system.

I suggest the issue here is not that I don't understand the difference between the two, it's you who are confused.

As for adult brothers sodomising each other, it's not morality that covers this activity, it's the people involves, it's their ethical decision that decides.

again what is you aversion to heterosexual incest? you demand sexual equality the rest of the time so why is THIS different?

bet you cant/wont answer

Because we are still waiting you to explain your position on the topic at hand. Then we can discuss other forms.

Now try again. Do you understand the difference between ethical decisions and moral ones?

If adult men have sex and this activity has no repercussions for anyone besides those involved, why do we have to decide if their decision is ethically acceptable to us and then so legal.

Back to top

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest
Reply #117 - Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 8:00pm

Aussie wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 7:57pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 7:55pm:

Secret Wars wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 7:48pm:

Just to interrupt the waltzing, peccary and greens are pro incest but wont say why, and longweekend is anti incest but won't say why not.

Looks like a stalemate.

And a win for slippery slopes.

except that I have all of human history and the law on my side. thats a significant advantage. And how many people would you ask that would NEED a detailed explanation to be anti-incest?

these two boofheads are on the side suggesting a change to millenia-old orthodoxy. They are the ones with the obligation to support their case.

I have not seen them say that at all. I have seen them ask you simple questions, and you doing all you can not to answer them.

no wonder you are a failed lawyer if you cant see, hear and understand and admission of being fine with incest when it is thrown in your face.

the average IQ of taxi drivers was NOT helped by your arrival to their unwashed ranks.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

Secret Wars

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 3928
Gender: male

Re: Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest
Reply #118 - Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 8:01pm

Aussie wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 7:57pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 7:55pm:

Secret Wars wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 7:48pm:

Just to interrupt the waltzing, peccary and greens are pro incest but wont say why, and longweekend is anti incest but won't say why not.

Looks like a stalemate.

And a win for slippery slopes.

except that I have all of human history and the law on my side. thats a significant advantage. And how many people would you ask that would NEED a detailed explanation to be anti-incest?

these two boofheads are on the side suggesting a change to millenia-old orthodoxy. They are the ones with the obligation to support their case.

I have not seen them say that at all. I have seen them ask you simple questions, and you doing all you can not to answer them.

A simple question for you then, are you pro or anti incest? And then explain your reasoning.

After all, I imagine you would not like to be accused of the same thing, of doing all you can not to answer.

Back to top

IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 38852
Gender: male

Re: Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest
Reply #119 - Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 8:03pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 8:00pm:

Aussie wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 7:57pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 7:55pm:

Secret Wars wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 7:48pm:

Just to interrupt the waltzing, peccary and greens are pro incest but wont say why, and longweekend is anti incest but won't say why not.

Looks like a stalemate.

And a win for slippery slopes.

except that I have all of human history and the law on my side. thats a significant advantage. And how many people would you ask that would NEED a detailed explanation to be anti-incest?

these two boofheads are on the side suggesting a change to millenia-old orthodoxy. They are the ones with the obligation to support their case.

I have not seen them say that at all. I have seen them ask you simple questions, and you doing all you can not to answer them.

no wonder you are a failed lawyer if you cant see, hear and understand and admission of being fine with incest when it is thrown in your face.

the average IQ of taxi drivers was NOT helped by your arrival to their unwashed ranks.

And there you go again with the silly half smart playground insults instead of concentrating on the question. How about explaining, as you said you could, why incest is illegal?

Back to top

IP Logged

Poll
Question: which best describes longstupidone
* This poll has now closed *
scared the libs will lose 0 (0.0%) panicking the libs will lose 0 (0.0%) shitting himself 1 (4.3%) an idiot 0 (0.0%) a cretin 0 (0.0%) a liar 0 (0.0%) all of the above 22 (95.7%) Total votes: 23 « Last Modified by: John Smith on: Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 10:48am »