Australian Politics Forum - Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest
Reply #120 - Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 8:04pm

____ wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 8:00pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 7:41pm:

Quote:

So peoples like the americans are morality free since they support the death penalty?

I think you are confusing ethics with morality.

It is ethical for the state to not murder an innocent person found guilty by a not so perfect legal system.

I suggest the issue here is not that I don't understand the difference between the two, it's you who are confused.

As for adult brothers sodomising each other, it's not morality that covers this activity, it's the people involves, it's their ethical decision that decides.

again what is you aversion to heterosexual incest? you demand sexual equality the rest of the time so why is THIS different?

bet you cant/wont answer

Because we are still waiting you to explain your position on the topic at hand. Then we can discuss other forms.

Now try again. Do you understand the difference between ethical decisions and moral ones?

If adult men have sex and this activity has no repercussions for anyone besides those involved, why do we have to decide if their decision is ethically acceptable to us and then so legal.

then why does that not equally apply to adults of BOTH genders. hmm??? being a tad sexist, arent we? and why should it be restricted to adults? why not adolescents? With the majority of people losing virginity WAY before 18, isnt that an artificial constraint? So why do we have it?

you sound rather heterophobic!

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 75137
Gender: male

Re: Why won't Longy answer?
Reply #121 - Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 8:06pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 7:57pm:

John Smith wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 7:53pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 7:43pm:

John Smith wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 7:38pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 7:07pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:53pm:

[quote author=longweekend58 link=1435884097/86#86 date=1435912788]Incest is a far stronger prohibition than adolescent sex ...

So you keep saying, yet you can't explain why?

Could you explain it to me now, please?

really really simple... even for you. Incest has been a taboo in every age, .

someone should have told all the royals for the last 2000 odd yrs

cousins, not siblings. Although still awful and responsible for the mental midgets that have inherited the

In Ancient Egypt the practice was not frowned upon and royalty would often marry members of their own family in a bid to preserve their royal lineage. In fact, historians believe that the practice was common in all classes of Egyptian society.

Nine of the 11 marriages that occurred over the dynasty's 200-year reign were consanguineous, with two uncle-niece marriages and one first-cousin marriage

15billion people have been born to this planet and you want to find 11 examples and think that is significant? especially when NONE of them were sibling such as being debated here?

ahh, so now you're redefining incest to mean siblings only? So father daughter's OK with you? mum and son? Just as long as we got it clear.

oh, did you miss this bit

In fact, historians believe that the practice was common in all classes of Egyptian society

11 examples my arse

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest
Reply #122 - Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 8:06pm

Secret Wars wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 8:01pm:

Aussie wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 7:57pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 7:55pm:

Secret Wars wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 7:48pm:

Just to interrupt the waltzing, peccary and greens are pro incest but wont say why, and longweekend is anti incest but won't say why not.

Looks like a stalemate.

And a win for slippery slopes.

except that I have all of human history and the law on my side. thats a significant advantage. And how many people would you ask that would NEED a detailed explanation to be anti-incest?

these two boofheads are on the side suggesting a change to millenia-old orthodoxy. They are the ones with the obligation to support their case.

I have not seen them say that at all. I have seen them ask you simple questions, and you doing all you can not to answer them.

A simple question for you then, are you pro or anti incest? And then explain your reasoning.

After all, I imagine you would not like to be accused of the same thing, of doing all you can not to answer.

I am anti-incest and I thought that was obvious, especially since I have said so frequently. And as stated earlier, the contrarian view was made (pro incest) and according to any form of logic, they need to support their position first before the default position is defended otherwise they can be ignored.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Why won't Longy answer?
Reply #123 - Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 8:08pm

John Smith wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 8:06pm: