Australian Politics Forum - Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest

Secret Wars

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 3928
Gender: male

Re: Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest
Reply #135 - Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 8:48pm

Aussie wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 8:44pm:

Secret Wars wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 8:40pm:

Aussie wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 8:36pm:

Quote:

Aussie said it was a simple question that needed an answer but so far has avoiding doing what he urged longweekend to do.

Gee, I wonder if that could be because it was not me who was claiming to know why it was taboo/illegal. That was melielongtime.

Hehehehe, you pro or anti incest? Simple question and with an explanation why you think so. As you said.

Surely you can answer a simple question?

I've never given it a great deal of thought as I have never been presented with the problem either personally, or even professionally for that matter..

Hehehehehehehe....how about you. You pro or anti incest. Surely you can answer a simple question?

This is where you came in.

Aussie wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 7:57pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 7:55pm:

Secret Wars wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 7:48pm:

Just to interrupt the waltzing, peccary and greens are pro incest but wont say why, and longweekend is anti incest but won't say why not.

Looks like a stalemate.

And a win for slippery slopes.

except that I have all of human history and the law on my side. thats a significant advantage. And how many people would you ask that would NEED a detailed explanation to be anti-incest?

these two boofheads are on the side suggesting a change to millenia-old orthodoxy. They are the ones with the obligation to support their case.

I have not seen them say that at all. I have seen them ask you simple questions, and you doing all you can not to answer them.

Not me pontificating about simple questions and doing all you can not to answer them.

That would be you, and you are still doing all you can not to answer questions that you, not me, described as simple.

Exactly what you accused longweekend of. Roll Eyes

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 139402 Gender:	Re: Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest Reply #136 - Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 9:14pm Secret Wars wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 8:34pm: I dunno if any one was proved wrong or right. Peccary and Greenswin were pro incest but didn't say why ... Incorrect. Scroll back.
Back to top	IP Logged

Secret Wars

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 3928
Gender: male

Re: Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest
Reply #137 - Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 9:17pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 9:14pm:

Secret Wars wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 8:34pm:

I dunno if any one was proved wrong or right. Peccary and Greenswin were pro incest but didn't say why ...

Incorrect.

Scroll back.

Nine pages of waltzing? Couldn't be bothered. Maybe you can post here or your previous quote why you are pro incest then.

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 139402
Gender: male

Longy & Armpit Planning a Spring Wedding
Reply #138 - Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 9:24pm

Secret Wars wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 9:17pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 9:14pm:

Secret Wars wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 8:34pm:

I dunno if any one was proved wrong or right. Peccary and Greenswin were pro incest but didn't say why ...

Incorrect.

Scroll back.

Nine pages of waltzing? Couldn't be bothered. Maybe you can post here or your previous quote why you are pro incest then.

Post #98.

It hurts no one.

They are consenting adults.

It provides them with pleasure.

What they do is none of my business.

Gay incest, among adults, is perfectly OK (for others who are into that) in my book.

Back to top

IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 38852
Gender: male

Re: Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest
Reply #139 - Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 9:33pm

Quote:

That would be you, and you are still doing all you can not to answer questions that you, not me, described as simple.

And that would be because melielongtime boasted that he knew the answer....yet despite that protestation, and despite being asked a simple question by more than just one poster, he never explained his knowledge of the answer and chose to ad hom dump on others.

End.

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 139402
Gender: male

Re: Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest
Reply #140 - Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 9:36pm

Aussie wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 9:33pm:

Quote:

That would be you, and you are still doing all you can not to answer questions that you, not me, described as simple.

And that would be because melielongtime boasted that he knew the answer....yet despite that protestation, and despite being asked a simple question by more than just one poster, he never explained his knowledge of the answer and chose to ad hom dump on others.

End.

He's never done that before.

Back to top

IP Logged

Setanta

Gold Member

Offline

\/ Peace man!

Posts: 16625
Northern NSW
Gender: male

Re: Longy & Armpit Planning a Spring Wedding
Reply #141 - Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 9:36pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 9:24pm:

Secret Wars wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 9:17pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 9:14pm:

Secret Wars wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 8:34pm:

I dunno if any one was proved wrong or right. Peccary and Greenswin were pro incest but didn't say why ...

Incorrect.

Scroll back.

Nine pages of waltzing? Couldn't be bothered. Maybe you can post here or your previous quote why you are pro incest then.

Post #98.

It hurts no one.

They are consenting adults.

It provides them with pleasure.

What they do is none of my business.

Gay incest, among adults, is perfectly OK (for others who are into that) in my book.

In reality, with those caveats, there is no problem with hetro incest either, especially with contraception. The negative argument of birth/child problems is easily shown to be a nonsense when there is no censure against people with known genetic incompatibility like brittle bone syndrome. I know a woman with three daughters with it whilst neither of the parents have it. They chose to have more children knowing there was a damn good chance of genetic problems. Should we legislate against them too? Not to mention, where would our Western monarchies be without interbreeding.

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 139402
Gender: male

Re: Longy & Armpit Planning a Spring Wedding
Reply #142 - Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 9:40pm

Setanta wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 9:36pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 9:24pm:

Secret Wars wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 9:17pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 9:14pm:

Secret Wars wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 8:34pm:

I dunno if any one was proved wrong or right. Peccary and Greenswin were pro incest but didn't say why ...

Incorrect.

Scroll back.

Nine pages of waltzing? Couldn't be bothered. Maybe you can post here or your previous quote why you are pro incest then.

Post #98.

It hurts no one.

They are consenting adults.

It provides them with pleasure.

What they do is none of my business.

Gay incest, among adults, is perfectly OK (for others who are into that) in my book.

In reality, with those caveats, there is no problem with hetro incest either, especially with contraception. The negative argument of birth/child problems is easily shown to be a nonsense when there is no censure against people with known genetic incopatibility like brittle bone syndrome.

I'm merely erring on the side of precaution.

I don't really have a problem with hetero incest.

Moreover, nobody can tell me why I should.

Back to top

IP Logged

Setanta

Gold Member

Offline

\/ Peace man!

Posts: 16625
Northern NSW
Gender: male

Re: Longy & Armpit Planning a Spring Wedding
Reply #143 - Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 10:00pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 9:40pm:

Setanta wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 9:36pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 9:24pm:

Secret Wars wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 9:17pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 9:14pm:

Secret Wars wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 8:34pm:

I dunno if any one was proved wrong or right. Peccary and Greenswin were pro incest but didn't say why ...

Incorrect.

Scroll back.

Nine pages of waltzing? Couldn't be bothered. Maybe you can post here or your previous quote why you are pro incest then.

Post #98.

It hurts no one.

They are consenting adults.

It provides them with pleasure.

What they do is none of my business.

Gay incest, among adults, is perfectly OK (for others who are into that) in my book.

In reality, with those caveats, there is no problem with hetro incest either, especially with contraception. The negative argument of birth/child problems is easily shown to be a nonsense when there is no censure against people with known genetic incopatibility like brittle bone syndrome.

I'm merely erring on the side of precaution.

I don't really have a problem with hetero incest.

Moreover, nobody can tell me why I should.

Fair enough cobber, it should be put out there on an equal footing. Not that I'm into my older sis, haven't seen her in 20 years and talked to her two or three times on the phone in that time. To leave it out is a bit of cherry picking(snicker). I don't care what any consenting adult wants to do with each other as long as I don't have to watch, it's sad so many people act like they are forced to watch or be involved.

Back to top

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 96506

Re: Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest
Reply #144 - Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 10:11pm

Has Longy answered yet? I couldn’t be bothered scrolling through all the denials.

It’s clear to me now that Longy is in a non-consentual relationship with his father or son and, for obvious reasons, does not want to disclose such confidential information.

We all support you, Longy. It’s good you’ve finally come clean.

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 139402 Gender:	Re: Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest Reply #145 - Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 10:21pm Karnal wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 10:11pm: It’s clear to me now that Longy is in a non-consentual relationship with his father or son. Not that there's anything wrong with that.
Back to top	IP Logged

Setanta

Gold Member

Offline

\/ Peace man!

Posts: 16625
Northern NSW
Gender: male

Re: Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest
Reply #146 - Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 10:37pm

Karnal wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 10:11pm:

Has Longy answered yet? I couldn’t be bothered scrolling through all the denials.

It’s clear to me now that Longy is in a non-consentual relationship with his father or son and, for obvious reasons, does not want to disclose such confidential information.

We all support you, Longy. It’s good you’ve finally come clean.

I actually thing longy has a totally different relationship. Let me tell it with rhyme, rhyming slang, and metaphor with a little poem I have written for him.

Ode to the Monkey Spanker, Longy.

He abuses his little monkey
And spanks it till it cries
Beats it with out mercy
Till it's lifeless 'tween his thighs

Then as bruised and defiled it lies
In a pool of it's own tears
He wipes the oozing from it's eye
Before it can adhere.

Back to top

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 96506

Re: Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest
Reply #147 - Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 11:39pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 10:21pm:

Karnal wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 10:11pm:

It’s clear to me now that Longy is in a non-consentual relationship with his father or son.

Not that there's anything wrong with that.

Absolutely nothing. We all support incest here - with informed consent.

I think it would help Longy if he gave up his denial. The truth would set him free, as it were.

Man up, Longy. We all support you.

Back to top

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 96506

Re: Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest
Reply #148 - Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 11:41pm

Setanta wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 10:37pm:

Karnal wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 10:11pm:

Has Longy answered yet? I couldn’t be bothered scrolling through all the denials.

It’s clear to me now that Longy is in a non-consentual relationship with his father or son and, for obvious reasons, does not want to disclose such confidential information.

We all support you, Longy. It’s good you’ve finally come clean.

I actually thing longy has a totally different relationship. Let me tell it with rhyme, rhyming slang, and metaphor with a little poem I have written for him.

Ode to the Monkey Spanker, Longy.

He abuses his little monkey
And spanks it till it cries
Beats it with out mercy
Till it's lifeless 'tween his thighs

Then as bruised and defiled it lies
In a pool of it's own tears
He wipes the oozing from it's eye
Before it can adhere.

Yes, it’s sad.

I, for one, think he’s really very brave.

Back to top

IP Logged

Setanta

Gold Member

Offline

\/ Peace man!

Posts: 16625
Northern NSW
Gender: male

Re: Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest
Reply #149 - Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 11:44pm

Karnal wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 11:39pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 10:21pm:

Karnal wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 10:11pm:

It’s clear to me now that Longy is in a non-consentual relationship with his father or son.

Not that there's anything wrong with that.

Absolutely nothing. We all support incest here - with informed consent.

I think it would help Longy if he gave up his denial. The truth would set him free, as it were.

Man up, Longy. We all support you.

Is longy Oedipus? I never would have guessed!

edit: It is a bit ikky! Glad I don't have to be there.

Back to top

IP Logged

Poll
Question: which best describes longstupidone
* This poll has now closed *
scared the libs will lose 0 (0.0%) panicking the libs will lose 0 (0.0%) shitting himself 1 (4.3%) an idiot 0 (0.0%) a cretin 0 (0.0%) a liar 0 (0.0%) all of the above 22 (95.7%) Total votes: 23 « Last Modified by: John Smith on: Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 10:48am »