Australian Politics Forum - Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest

John Smith Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 75137 Gender:	Re: Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest Reply #165 - Jul 4^th, 2015 at 3:44pm longweekend58 wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 10:50am: JS of course comes down on the opposite side of any argument I an in not at all ... it's just that i know ANYTIME you make a claim it is bound to be false. I do enjoy making you look the fool all the time.
Back to top	Our esteemed leader: I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus. IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 139402
Gender: male

Longy wants to know why underage should be a probl
Reply #166 - Jul 4^th, 2015 at 5:18pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 1:12pm:

Bam wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 11:41am:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 10:57am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 10:52am:

Bam wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 12:15am:

You have no links, no proof and no credibility. As usual.

That's out Longy Wink

so Bam the idiot,

A sure sign that you cannot refute the argument.

Quote:

misses ELEVEN PAGES of debate and goes back to the OP???

So are you saying that the OP is irrelevant? Which you made? Grin

Quote:

poor diddums. I wonder if Bam/Pebbles is in support of incest too???

You wonder a lot of things. Most people are smart enough to have mental filters that disregard silly nonsense. You do not; instead you post it on internet forums. Cheesy

You really need help. I suggest changing your medication, it's not working.

do you even know what the OP was?? it was in reference to greens_los making thread titles with little to no reference to his OPs. How was I to know that I accidentally discovered that gay supporters are also pro-incest?

What's wrong with gay incest, Longy.

Why is it illegal?

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 139402 Gender:	Re: Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest Reply #167 - Jul 4^th, 2015 at 5:19pm longweekend58 wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 3:20pm: Karnal wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 1:39pm: Alas, I am not blessed with a daughter, Longy, but perhaps our discussion gives you some ideas for your answer about why incest is a criminal act. lucky for her. Lucly for whom?
Back to top	IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest
Reply #168 - Jul 4^th, 2015 at 5:30pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 5:19pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 3:20pm:

Karnal wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 1:39pm:

Alas, I am not blessed with a daughter, Longy, but perhaps our discussion gives you some ideas for your answer about why incest is a criminal act.

lucky for her.

Lucly for whom? Undecided

the daughter that would otherwise have to deal with a lecherous karnal. same applies to your son or brother.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest
Reply #169 - Jul 4^th, 2015 at 5:38pm

John Smith wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 3:44pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 10:50am:

JS of course comes down on the opposite side of any argument I an in

not at all ... it's just that i know ANYTIME you make a claim it is bound to be false. I do enjoy making you look the fool all the time. Grin

then my support of negative gearing must cause you a migraine. You are one of the least worthy contributors to this forum as you simply take and abbott statement, policy, action or thought and assume the opposite stance. you are the definitional idiot.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Longy wants to know why underage should be a probl
Reply #170 - Jul 4^th, 2015 at 5:41pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 5:18pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 1:12pm:

Bam wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 11:41am:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 10:57am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 10:52am:

Bam wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 12:15am:

You have no links, no proof and no credibility. As usual.

That's out Longy Wink

so Bam the idiot,

A sure sign that you cannot refute the argument.

Quote:

misses ELEVEN PAGES of debate and goes back to the OP???

So are you saying that the OP is irrelevant? Which you made? Grin

Quote:

poor diddums. I wonder if Bam/Pebbles is in support of incest too???

You wonder a lot of things. Most people are smart enough to have mental filters that disregard silly nonsense. You do not; instead you post it on internet forums. Cheesy

You really need help. I suggest changing your medication, it's not working.

do you even know what the OP was?? it was in reference to greens_los making thread titles with little to no reference to his OPs. How was I to know that I accidentally discovered that gay supporters are also pro-incest?

What's wrong with gay incest, Longy.

Why is it illegal?

already done that dance with you, fool. if you cannot understand why history's longest-lasting and most universal taboo is such, then really you could have trouble with understanding that the world is spherical.

but you really let us all into the secret that gay supporters are also incest supporters and that for all the shouts of 'equality', you dont want any such thing... just your own way.

pitiful.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 75137
Gender: male

Re: Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest
Reply #171 - Jul 4^th, 2015 at 5:43pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 5:38pm:

John Smith wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 3:44pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 10:50am:

JS of course comes down on the opposite side of any argument I an in

not at all ... it's just that i know ANYTIME you make a claim it is bound to be false. I do enjoy making you look the fool all the time. Grin

then my support of negative gearing must cause you a migraine. You are one of the least worthy contributors to this forum as you simply take and abbott statement, policy, action or thought and assume the opposite stance. you are the definitional idiot.

I love it when you disagree with me, it tells me I must be right.

Your support of negative gearing doesn't mean sheat to me, just like any of your other opinions.

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest
Reply #172 - Jul 4^th, 2015 at 5:43pm

anyhow peccahead. since Bam has rejected the challenge due to unresolved cowardice issues are you willing to take up the challenge of writing a 250 word article in support of a position you thoroughly reject? Since my writing (of articles) is so good that it upsets you leftie-losers perhaps you would like to do battle with words? and what better way to do so than to passionately write in support of a position you personally oppose.

let the excuses begin.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 75137
Gender: male

Re: Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest
Reply #173 - Jul 4^th, 2015 at 5:45pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 5:43pm:

anyhow peccahead. since Bam has rejected the challenge due to unresolved cowardice issues are you willing to take up the challenge of writing a 250 word article in support of a position you thoroughly reject? Since my writing (of articles) is so good that it upsets you leftie-losers perhaps you would like to do battle with words? and what better way to do so than to passionately write in support of a position you personally oppose.

let the excuses begin.

still pretending you wrote the article longie? Grin

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 96507

Re: Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest
Reply #174 - Jul 4^th, 2015 at 5:54pm

Now now, Longy, Malcolm Turnbull might try it, but the old "if you don't understand" routine doesn't actually work.

Incest laws are not very old at all. They were introduced during the Victorian era. They are preceeded by a much older and more enduring taboo, a taboo that is now abandoned: adultery.

Another taboo we've abandoned is still illegal in most parts of the world: sodomy.

But I'm not wondering about the taboo, I'm wondering about the law. Why does a taboo like incest have a law about it?

You can fudge and pack and slurp and whine all you like, but your inability to discuss this issue is a testament to your incestual desire.

All taboos are.

Back to top

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 96507

Re: Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest
Reply #175 - Jul 4^th, 2015 at 5:55pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 5:43pm:

anyhow peccahead. since Bam has rejected the challenge due to unresolved cowardice issues are you willing to take up the challenge of writing a 250 word article in support of a position you thoroughly reject? Since my writing (of articles) is so good that it upsets you leftie-losers perhaps you would like to do battle with words? and what better way to do so than to passionately write in support of a position you personally oppose.

let the excuses begin.

Does you challenge extend to me?

I accept.

Back to top

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest
Reply #176 - Jul 4^th, 2015 at 5:56pm

John Smith wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 5:45pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 5:43pm:

anyhow peccahead. since Bam has rejected the challenge due to unresolved cowardice issues are you willing to take up the challenge of writing a 250 word article in support of a position you thoroughly reject? Since my writing (of articles) is so good that it upsets you leftie-losers perhaps you would like to do battle with words? and what better way to do so than to passionately write in support of a position you personally oppose.

let the excuses begin.

still pretending you wrote the article longie? Grin

yep, hence the challenge. You of course are not invited since you are clearly not up to the intellectual and educational demands. IM not that cruel.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest
Reply #177 - Jul 4^th, 2015 at 5:57pm

Karnal wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 5:55pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 5:43pm:

anyhow peccahead. since Bam has rejected the challenge due to unresolved cowardice issues are you willing to take up the challenge of writing a 250 word article in support of a position you thoroughly reject? Since my writing (of articles) is so good that it upsets you leftie-losers perhaps you would like to do battle with words? and what better way to do so than to passionately write in support of a position you personally oppose.

let the excuses begin.

Does you challenge extend to me?

I accept.

nope because you are an absolute idiot who woudlnt even attempt to do so within the rules or the intent.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

crocodile Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 6683 Gender:	Re: Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest Reply #178 - Jul 4^th, 2015 at 5:59pm At least it's a game the whole family can play.
Back to top	Very funny Scotty, now beam down my clothes. IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 35584
Gender: female

Re: Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest
Reply #179 - Jul 4^th, 2015 at 5:59pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 5:57pm:

Karnal wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 5:55pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 5:43pm:

anyhow peccahead. since Bam has rejected the challenge due to unresolved cowardice issues are you willing to take up the challenge of writing a 250 word article in support of a position you thoroughly reject? Since my writing (of articles) is so good that it upsets you leftie-losers perhaps you would like to do battle with words? and what better way to do so than to passionately write in support of a position you personally oppose.

let the excuses begin.

Does you challenge extend to me?

I accept.

nope because you are an absolute idiot who woudlnt even attempt to do so within the rules or the intent.

What's the essay question? I did debating in high school ... not hard to plead a case.

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

Poll
Question: which best describes longstupidone
* This poll has now closed *
scared the libs will lose 0 (0.0%) panicking the libs will lose 0 (0.0%) shitting himself 1 (4.3%) an idiot 0 (0.0%) a cretin 0 (0.0%) a liar 0 (0.0%) all of the above 22 (95.7%) Total votes: 23 « Last Modified by: John Smith on: Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 10:48am »