Australian Politics Forum - Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 35585
Gender: female

Re: Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest
Reply #180 - Jul 4^th, 2015 at 6:03pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 5:57pm:

Karnal wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 5:55pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 5:43pm:

anyhow peccahead. since Bam has rejected the challenge due to unresolved cowardice issues are you willing to take up the challenge of writing a 250 word article in support of a position you thoroughly reject? Since my writing (of articles) is so good that it upsets you leftie-losers perhaps you would like to do battle with words? and what better way to do so than to passionately write in support of a position you personally oppose.

let the excuses begin.

Does you challenge extend to me?

I accept.

nope because you are an absolute idiot who woudlnt even attempt to do so within the rules or the intent.

Firstly, i think you're afraid of taking Karnal on.

Secondly, what are the rules?

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 139530
Gender: male

Re: Longy wants to know why underage should be a probl
Reply #181 - Jul 4^th, 2015 at 6:10pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 5:41pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 5:18pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 1:12pm:

Bam wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 11:41am:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 10:57am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 10:52am:

Bam wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 12:15am:

You have no links, no proof and no credibility. As usual.

That's out Longy Wink

so Bam the idiot,

A sure sign that you cannot refute the argument.

Quote:

misses ELEVEN PAGES of debate and goes back to the OP???

So are you saying that the OP is irrelevant? Which you made? Grin

Quote:

poor diddums. I wonder if Bam/Pebbles is in support of incest too???

You wonder a lot of things. Most people are smart enough to have mental filters that disregard silly nonsense. You do not; instead you post it on internet forums. Cheesy

You really need help. I suggest changing your medication, it's not working.

do you even know what the OP was?? it was in reference to greens_los making thread titles with little to no reference to his OPs. How was I to know that I accidentally discovered that gay supporters are also pro-incest?

What's wrong with gay incest, Longy.

Why is it illegal?

already done that dance with you, fool. if you cannot understand why history's longest-lasting and most universal taboo is such, then really you could have trouble with understanding that the world is spherical.

but you really let us all into the secret that gay supporters are also incest supporters and that for all the shouts of 'equality', you dont want any such thing... just your own way.

pitiful.

What's wrong with gay incest, Longy.

Why is it illegal?

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 139530
Gender: male

Age doesn't matter to Longy
Reply #182 - Jul 4^th, 2015 at 6:12pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 5:30pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 5:19pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 3:20pm:

Karnal wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 1:39pm:

Alas, I am not blessed with a daughter, Longy, but perhaps our discussion gives you some ideas for your answer about why incest is a criminal act.

lucky for her.

Lucly for whom? Undecided

the daughter that would otherwise have to deal with a lecherous karnal. same applies to your son or brother.

You're talking about someone who doesn't exist.

You do realise that, Don't you.

Back to top

IP Logged

Karnal Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 96570	Re: Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest Reply #183 - Jul 4^th, 2015 at 6:12pm We'll make it a thousand words, Longy. You can write the rules.
Back to top	IP Logged

greggerypeccary Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 139530 Gender:	Age doesn't matter to Longy Reply #184 - Jul 4^th, 2015 at 6:17pm longweekend58 wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 5:43pm: Since my writing (of articles) is so good ... I'd like to see one of those articles.
Back to top	IP Logged

Lobo Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 7407 Sydney Gender:	Re: Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest Reply #185 - Jul 4^th, 2015 at 6:44pm longy..... Why did GOD not punish Lot's daughters????
Back to top	"What's in store for me in the direction I don't take?"-Jack Kerouac. IP Logged

John Smith Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 75162 Gender:	Re: Age doesn't matter to Longy Reply #186 - Jul 4^th, 2015 at 6:57pm greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 6:17pm: longweekend58 wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 5:43pm: Since my writing (of articles) is so good ... I'd like to see one of those articles. apparently a post on a forum is now an 'article'
Back to top	Our esteemed leader: I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus. IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 139530
Gender: male

Re: Age doesn't matter to Longy
Reply #187 - Jul 4^th, 2015 at 7:00pm

John Smith wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 6:57pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 6:17pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 5:43pm:

Since my writing (of articles) is so good ...

I'd like to see one of those articles.

apparently a post on a forum is now an 'article'

Ah, I see.

Well, in that case, I've seen better "articles" from dyslexic primary school children.

And, I'm dead serious about that.

Back to top

IP Logged

Aussie Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 38856 Gender:	Re: Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest Reply #188 - Jul 4^th, 2015 at 7:06pm Lobo wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 6:44pm: longy..... Why did GOD not punish Lot's daughters???? He won't answer any questions about all that 'begatting.' I've already tried.
Back to top	IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest
Reply #189 - Jul 4^th, 2015 at 7:23pm

mothra wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 5:59pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 5:57pm:

Karnal wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 5:55pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 5:43pm:

anyhow peccahead. since Bam has rejected the challenge due to unresolved cowardice issues are you willing to take up the challenge of writing a 250 word article in support of a position you thoroughly reject? Since my writing (of articles) is so good that it upsets you leftie-losers perhaps you would like to do battle with words? and what better way to do so than to passionately write in support of a position you personally oppose.

let the excuses begin.

Does you challenge extend to me?

I accept.

nope because you are an absolute idiot who woudlnt even attempt to do so within the rules or the intent.

What's the essay question? I did debating in high school ... not hard to plead a case.

it was about arguing FOR a position you are passionately AGAINST.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest
Reply #190 - Jul 4^th, 2015 at 7:23pm

mothra wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 6:03pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 5:57pm:

Karnal wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 5:55pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 5:43pm:

anyhow peccahead. since Bam has rejected the challenge due to unresolved cowardice issues are you willing to take up the challenge of writing a 250 word article in support of a position you thoroughly reject? Since my writing (of articles) is so good that it upsets you leftie-losers perhaps you would like to do battle with words? and what better way to do so than to passionately write in support of a position you personally oppose.

let the excuses begin.

Does you challenge extend to me?

I accept.

nope because you are an absolute idiot who woudlnt even attempt to do so within the rules or the intent.

Firstly, i think you're afraid of taking Karnal on.

Secondly, what are the rules?

250 words written to your best standard supporting something we all know you are passionately opposed to.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Age doesn't matter to Longy
Reply #191 - Jul 4^th, 2015 at 7:26pm

John Smith wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 6:57pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 6:17pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 5:43pm:

Since my writing (of articles) is so good ...

I'd like to see one of those articles.

apparently a post on a forum is now an 'article'

and that level of literary ignorance is why you are not invited. it would be like debating a child... with a intellectual disability... in a bubble... while asleep.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 139530
Gender: male

Re: Age doesn't matter to Longy
Reply #192 - Jul 4^th, 2015 at 7:30pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 7:26pm:

John Smith wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 6:57pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 6:17pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 5:43pm:

Since my writing (of articles) is so good ...

I'd like to see one of those articles.

apparently a post on a forum is now an 'article'

and that level of literary ignorance is why you are not invited. it would be like debating a child... with a intellectual disability... in a bubble... while asleep.

How is Armpit? I haven't seen him for awhile.

Back to top

IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 35585
Gender: female

Re: Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest
Reply #193 - Jul 4^th, 2015 at 7:31pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 7:23pm:

mothra wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 6:03pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 5:57pm:

Karnal wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 5:55pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 4^th, 2015 at 5:43pm:

anyhow peccahead. since Bam has rejected the challenge due to unresolved cowardice issues are you willing to take up the challenge of writing a 250 word article in support of a position you thoroughly reject? Since my writing (of articles) is so good that it upsets you leftie-losers perhaps you would like to do battle with words? and what better way to do so than to passionately write in support of a position you personally oppose.

let the excuses begin.

Does you challenge extend to me?

I accept.

nope because you are an absolute idiot who woudlnt even attempt to do so within the rules or the intent.

Firstly, i think you're afraid of taking Karnal on.

Secondly, what are the rules?

250 words written to your best standard supporting something we all know you are passionately opposed to.

Seems pretty straight forward. Which aspects of these 'rules' do you fear Karnal would not be able to follow?

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

Karnal Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 96570	Re: Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest Reply #194 - Jul 4^th, 2015 at 7:35pm Quote: 250 words written to your best standard supporting something we all know you are passionately opposed to. Make it a thousand and I'll accept your offer. I couldn't possibly sell a man like Mr Abbott in anything less.
Back to top	IP Logged

Poll
Question: which best describes longstupidone
* This poll has now closed *
scared the libs will lose 0 (0.0%) panicking the libs will lose 0 (0.0%) shitting himself 1 (4.3%) an idiot 0 (0.0%) a cretin 0 (0.0%) a liar 0 (0.0%) all of the above 22 (95.7%) Total votes: 23 « Last Modified by: John Smith on: Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 10:48am »