Australian Politics Forum - Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Longy wants to know why underage should be a probl
Reply #60 - Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:03pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 5:56pm:

Karnal wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 5:37pm:

But I am curious about your tendency to refuse to explain your views, but demand answers from others. If anyone asked me something, I’d be happy to tell them what I thought.

Are you trying to cover something up here?

Yes, one can only assume that he is covering something up here.

A simple question, and he avoids it at all costs.

Very strange.

not strange at all. FOr most people, the resons incest is prohibited would be rather obvious and well known, but for some reason YOU dont know and instead SUPPORT incest.

why do you support incest, peccahead???

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest
Reply #61 - Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:04pm

____ wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:02pm:

Liar liar pants on fire old man.

I did not.
I asked a question which you still haven't answered.
Asking doesn't mean support.

liar yourself. you are on record as saying you see nothing wrong with incest. Gay incest of course. No 'equality' for you... when it suits you.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

____ Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 33410 Australia Gender:	Re: Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest Reply #62 - Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:05pm So Longweekend, what is wrong with two consenting adult brothers having sex, since there is no chance of reproduction, and so inbreeding. Please note this is a question, not a statement of my position on the topic. Spelling it out since you seem a little slow on the topic.
Back to top	IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 139551
Gender: male

Why doesn't Longy answer questions?
Reply #63 - Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:06pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:03pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 5:56pm:

Karnal wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 5:37pm:

But I am curious about your tendency to refuse to explain your views, but demand answers from others. If anyone asked me something, I’d be happy to tell them what I thought.

Are you trying to cover something up here?

Yes, one can only assume that he is covering something up here.

A simple question, and he avoids it at all costs.

Very strange.

not strange at all. FOr most people, the resons incest is prohibited would be rather obvious and well known, but for some reason YOU dont know ...

Can you tell me why it's illegal then?

I need the benefit of your extensive knowledge.

Back to top

IP Logged

____

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 33410
Australia
Gender: male

Re: Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest
Reply #64 - Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:07pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:04pm:

____ wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:02pm:

Liar liar pants on fire old man.

I did not.
I asked a question which you still haven't answered.
Asking doesn't mean support.

liar yourself. you are on record as saying you see nothing wrong with incest. Gay incest of course. No 'equality' for you... when it suits you.

The question is the next one above post and will be revealed soon.

Try answering this time around mr coward.

Back to top

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest
Reply #65 - Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:09pm

____ wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:05pm:

So Longweekend, what is wrong with two consenting adult brothers having sex, since there is no chance of reproduction, and so inbreeding.

Please note this is a question, not a statement of my position on the topic. Spelling it out since you seem a little slow on the topic.

even asking that question implies you support for gay incest. you do realise that 'inbreeding' is only one of the reasons for the ages-long taboo against incest?

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest
Reply #66 - Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:11pm

____ wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:07pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:04pm:

____ wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:02pm:

Liar liar pants on fire old man.

I did not.
I asked a question which you still haven't answered.
Asking doesn't mean support.

liar yourself. you are on record as saying you see nothing wrong with incest. Gay incest of course. No 'equality' for you... when it suits you.

The question is the next one above post and will be revealed soon.

Try answering this time around mr coward.

so why dont you and peccahead EXPLICITY oppose incest and then we can move on. But you wont... or cant. the reasons for that are intriguing.

pecca and green_snot both pro-incest??? a tad surprising in the former and virtually guaranteed in the latter.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 38858
Gender: male

Re: Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest
Reply #67 - Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:13pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:09pm:

____ wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:05pm:

So Longweekend, what is wrong with two consenting adult brothers having sex, since there is no chance of reproduction, and so inbreeding.

Please note this is a question, not a statement of my position on the topic. Spelling it out since you seem a little slow on the topic.

even asking that question implies you support for gay incest. you do realise that 'inbreeding' is only one of the reasons for the ages-long taboo against incest?

Way back in the days of all that 'begatting' who was doing the begatting?

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 139551
Gender: male

Re: Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest
Reply #68 - Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:13pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:09pm:

____ wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:05pm:

So Longweekend, what is wrong with two consenting adult brothers having sex, since there is no chance of reproduction, and so inbreeding.

Please note this is a question, not a statement of my position on the topic. Spelling it out since you seem a little slow on the topic.

even asking that question implies you support for gay incest. you do realise that 'inbreeding' is only one of the reasons for the ages-long taboo against incest?

Although I don't have your extensive knowledge, I'm pretty sure that two brothers having sex with each other can't actually breed.

So, if they are both of legal age and both consent to the sexual acts, why would you want to interfere?

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 139551
Gender: male

Longy is confused (more than usual)
Reply #69 - Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:16pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:11pm:

____ wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:07pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:04pm:

____ wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:02pm:

Liar liar pants on fire old man.

I did not.
I asked a question which you still haven't answered.
Asking doesn't mean support.

liar yourself. you are on record as saying you see nothing wrong with incest. Gay incest of course. No 'equality' for you... when it suits you.

The question is the next one above post and will be revealed soon.

Try answering this time around mr coward.

so why dont you and peccahead EXPLICITY oppose incest and then we can move on. But you wont... or cant. the reasons for that are intriguing.

Why would I oppose incest between two consenting males who are both of legal age?

Seems a strange thing to do.

What they get up to in the bedroom is their business.

Why do you want to interfere?

Back to top

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest
Reply #70 - Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:20pm

Aussie wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:13pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:09pm:

____ wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:05pm:

So Longweekend, what is wrong with two consenting adult brothers having sex, since there is no chance of reproduction, and so inbreeding.

Please note this is a question, not a statement of my position on the topic. Spelling it out since you seem a little slow on the topic.

even asking that question implies you support for gay incest. you do realise that 'inbreeding' is only one of the reasons for the ages-long taboo against incest?

Way back in the days of all that 'begatting' who was doing the begatting?

do you want to embarrass yourself again with your phenomenal display of ignorance on history? Who could forget your diatribe about Biblical names such as Andrew, Simon, John etc and how they could not possibly be jewish names.

that was truly delicious watching your ignorance on display.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

____

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 33410
Australia
Gender: male

Re: Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest
Reply #71 - Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:21pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:09pm:

____ wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:05pm:

So Longweekend, what is wrong with two consenting adult brothers having sex, since there is no chance of reproduction, and so inbreeding.

Please note this is a question, not a statement of my position on the topic. Spelling it out since you seem a little slow on the topic.

even asking that question implies you support for gay incest. you do realise that 'inbreeding' is only one of the reasons for the ages-long taboo against incest?

The question concerned morality and how you justified it within your mind.
Obviously, it is beyond your intelligence to rationalise such a complex process. I now understand your cultist life, in that you don't have to think for yourself.

Back to top

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest
Reply #72 - Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:21pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:13pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:09pm:

____ wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:05pm:

So Longweekend, what is wrong with two consenting adult brothers having sex, since there is no chance of reproduction, and so inbreeding.

Please note this is a question, not a statement of my position on the topic. Spelling it out since you seem a little slow on the topic.

even asking that question implies you support for gay incest. you do realise that 'inbreeding' is only one of the reasons for the ages-long taboo against incest?

Although I don't have your extensive knowledge, I'm pretty sure that two brothers having sex with each other can't actually breed.

So, if they are both of legal age and both consent to the sexual acts, why would you want to interfere?

so you ARE pro incest? thanks for finally admitting it.

btw, you can screw a 9yo girl and you cant breed. does that justify it? just ask ISIS in case you dont know the answer.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Longy is confused (more than usual)
Reply #73 - Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:22pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:16pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:11pm:

____ wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:07pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:04pm:

____ wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:02pm:

Liar liar pants on fire old man.

I did not.
I asked a question which you still haven't answered.
Asking doesn't mean support.

liar yourself. you are on record as saying you see nothing wrong with incest. Gay incest of course. No 'equality' for you... when it suits you.

The question is the next one above post and will be revealed soon.

Try answering this time around mr coward.

so why dont you and peccahead EXPLICITY oppose incest and then we can move on. But you wont... or cant. the reasons for that are intriguing.

Why would I oppose incest between two consenting males who are both of legal age?

Seems a strange thing to do.

What they get up to in the bedroom is their business.

Why do you want to interfere?

what about a brother and sister, Virginia andrews? is that okay by you as long as they use protection?

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

____

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 33410
Australia
Gender: male

Re: Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest
Reply #74 - Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:22pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:11pm:

____ wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:07pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:04pm:

____ wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:02pm:

Liar liar pants on fire old man.

I did not.
I asked a question which you still haven't answered.
Asking doesn't mean support.

liar yourself. you are on record as saying you see nothing wrong with incest. Gay incest of course. No 'equality' for you... when it suits you.

The question is the next one above post and will be revealed soon.

Try answering this time around mr coward.

so why dont you and peccahead EXPLICITY oppose incest and then we can move on. But you wont... or cant. the reasons for that are intriguing.

pecca and green_snot both pro-incest??? a tad surprising in the former and virtually guaranteed in the latter.

More interested on your morality. What drives it ... seems you don't know.

Back to top

IP Logged

Poll
Question: which best describes longstupidone
* This poll has now closed *
scared the libs will lose 0 (0.0%) panicking the libs will lose 0 (0.0%) shitting himself 1 (4.3%) an idiot 0 (0.0%) a cretin 0 (0.0%) a liar 0 (0.0%) all of the above 22 (95.7%) Total votes: 23 « Last Modified by: John Smith on: Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 10:48am »