Australian Politics Forum - Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest
Reply #75 - Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:23pm

____ wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:21pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:09pm:

____ wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:05pm:

So Longweekend, what is wrong with two consenting adult brothers having sex, since there is no chance of reproduction, and so inbreeding.

Please note this is a question, not a statement of my position on the topic. Spelling it out since you seem a little slow on the topic.

even asking that question implies you support for gay incest. you do realise that 'inbreeding' is only one of the reasons for the ages-long taboo against incest?

The question concerned morality and how you justified it within your mind.
Obviously, it is beyond your intelligence to rationalise such a complex process. I now understand your cultist life, in that you don't have to think for yourself.

what would YOU know about morality (or any other topic for that matter)? YOU are the pro-incest weirdo, not me.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest
Reply #76 - Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:25pm

____ wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:22pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:11pm:

____ wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:07pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:04pm:

____ wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:02pm:

Liar liar pants on fire old man.

I did not.
I asked a question which you still haven't answered.
Asking doesn't mean support.

liar yourself. you are on record as saying you see nothing wrong with incest. Gay incest of course. No 'equality' for you... when it suits you.

The question is the next one above post and will be revealed soon.

Try answering this time around mr coward.

so why dont you and peccahead EXPLICITY oppose incest and then we can move on. But you wont... or cant. the reasons for that are intriguing.

pecca and green_snot both pro-incest??? a tad surprising in the former and virtually guaranteed in the latter.

More interested on your morality. What drives it ... seems you don't know.

My morality is quite fin, thanks for asking. But I"ve yet to see you adopt a moral angle to any argument, ever. and her you are supporting INCEST of all things.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 139530
Gender: male

Why won't Longy answer?
Reply #77 - Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:26pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:22pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:16pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:11pm:

____ wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:07pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:04pm:

____ wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:02pm:

Liar liar pants on fire old man.

I did not.
I asked a question which you still haven't answered.
Asking doesn't mean support.

liar yourself. you are on record as saying you see nothing wrong with incest. Gay incest of course. No 'equality' for you... when it suits you.

The question is the next one above post and will be revealed soon.

Try answering this time around mr coward.

so why dont you and peccahead EXPLICITY oppose incest and then we can move on. But you wont... or cant. the reasons for that are intriguing.

Why would I oppose incest between two consenting males who are both of legal age?

Seems a strange thing to do.

What they get up to in the bedroom is their business.

Why do you want to interfere?

what about a brother and sister, Virginia andrews? is that okay by you as long as they use protection?

No.

So, why do you want to interfere with two consenting males who are both of legal age?

Back to top

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Why won't Longy answer?
Reply #78 - Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:28pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:26pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:22pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:16pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:11pm:

____ wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:07pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:04pm:

____ wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:02pm:

Liar liar pants on fire old man.

I did not.
I asked a question which you still haven't answered.
Asking doesn't mean support.

liar yourself. you are on record as saying you see nothing wrong with incest. Gay incest of course. No 'equality' for you... when it suits you.

The question is the next one above post and will be revealed soon.

Try answering this time around mr coward.

so why dont you and peccahead EXPLICITY oppose incest and then we can move on. But you wont... or cant. the reasons for that are intriguing.

Why would I oppose incest between two consenting males who are both of legal age?

Seems a strange thing to do.

What they get up to in the bedroom is their business.

Why do you want to interfere?

what about a brother and sister, Virginia andrews? is that okay by you as long as they use protection?

No.

So, why do you want to interfere with two consenting males who are both of legal age?

A) I never said I want to and
B) why dont you have a problem with incest? and...
C) if incest is of no concern, why does age figure into it? seems a rather pointless distinction when you are propose an amoral condition anyhow.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 38856
Gender: male

Re: Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest
Reply #79 - Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:29pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:20pm:

Aussie wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:13pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:09pm:

____ wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:05pm:

So Longweekend, what is wrong with two consenting adult brothers having sex, since there is no chance of reproduction, and so inbreeding.

Please note this is a question, not a statement of my position on the topic. Spelling it out since you seem a little slow on the topic.

even asking that question implies you support for gay incest. you do realise that 'inbreeding' is only one of the reasons for the ages-long taboo against incest?

Way back in the days of all that 'begatting' who was doing the begatting?

do you want to embarrass yourself again with your phenomenal display of ignorance on history? Who could forget your diatribe about Biblical names such as Andrew, Simon, John etc and how they could not possibly be jewish names.

that was truly delicious watching your ignorance on display.

Not for one nanosecond do I believe that there were blokes called Andrew or John etc wandering around with some person we have called 'Jesus,' so forget that line.

I'm quite happy for you to exclude acts of incest way back then when all that begatting was a'happening. Embarrass away. I don't care. Just answer the question, or if you'd rather not, just say so.

Back to top

IP Logged

____

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 33410
Australia
Gender: male

Re: Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest
Reply #80 - Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:31pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:23pm:

____ wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:21pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:09pm:

____ wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:05pm:

So Longweekend, what is wrong with two consenting adult brothers having sex, since there is no chance of reproduction, and so inbreeding.

Please note this is a question, not a statement of my position on the topic. Spelling it out since you seem a little slow on the topic.

even asking that question implies you support for gay incest. you do realise that 'inbreeding' is only one of the reasons for the ages-long taboo against incest?

The question concerned morality and how you justified it within your mind.
Obviously, it is beyond your intelligence to rationalise such a complex process. I now understand your cultist life, in that you don't have to think for yourself.

what would YOU know about morality (or any other topic for that matter)? YOU are the pro-incest weirdo, not me.

I am hoping to learn from your concept of morality.

Now I'm not a brain dead zombie in a bible class so you will require a logical position to win me over.

What are the perimeter so to frame your moral position on bro on bro incest?

Back to top

IP Logged

____

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 33410
Australia
Gender: male

Re: Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest
Reply #81 - Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:32pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:25pm:

____ wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:22pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:11pm:

____ wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:07pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:04pm:

____ wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:02pm:

Liar liar pants on fire old man.

I did not.
I asked a question which you still haven't answered.
Asking doesn't mean support.

liar yourself. you are on record as saying you see nothing wrong with incest. Gay incest of course. No 'equality' for you... when it suits you.

The question is the next one above post and will be revealed soon.

Try answering this time around mr coward.

so why dont you and peccahead EXPLICITY oppose incest and then we can move on. But you wont... or cant. the reasons for that are intriguing.

pecca and green_snot both pro-incest??? a tad surprising in the former and virtually guaranteed in the latter.

More interested on your morality. What drives it ... seems you don't know.

My morality is quite fin, thanks for asking. But I"ve yet to see you adopt a moral angle to any argument, ever. and her you are supporting INCEST of all things.

Since you claim your morals are fine, explain them concerning the bro on bro situation being discussed.

Back to top

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest
Reply #82 - Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:33pm

Aussie wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:29pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:20pm:

Aussie wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:13pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:09pm:

____ wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:05pm:

So Longweekend, what is wrong with two consenting adult brothers having sex, since there is no chance of reproduction, and so inbreeding.

Please note this is a question, not a statement of my position on the topic. Spelling it out since you seem a little slow on the topic.

even asking that question implies you support for gay incest. you do realise that 'inbreeding' is only one of the reasons for the ages-long taboo against incest?

Way back in the days of all that 'begatting' who was doing the begatting?

do you want to embarrass yourself again with your phenomenal display of ignorance on history? Who could forget your diatribe about Biblical names such as Andrew, Simon, John etc and how they could not possibly be jewish names.

that was truly delicious watching your ignorance on display.

Not for one nanosecond do I believe that there were blokes called Andrew or John etc wandering around with some person we have called 'Jesus,' so forget that line.

I'm quite happy for you to exclude acts of incest way back then when all that begatting was a'happening. Embarrass away. I don't care. Just answer the question, or if you'd rather not, just say so.

of course not:)) if there is ever a fact that challenges your preconceptions or worse, your morals (such as they are) just say it didnt happen. Pity that the evidence for it surpasses virtually all historical figures.

An Inconvenient Truth - the tag line to your life.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 139530
Gender: male

Re: Why won't Longy answer?
Reply #83 - Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:34pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:28pm:

A) I never said I want to and

So, you support incest.

B) why dont you have a problem with incest? and...

Between same sex couples, there is no problem. Why do you have a problem?

C) if incest is of no concern, why does age figure into it?

Because kiddies can't give informed consent. Incest and pedophilia are two different things, Longy.

Back to top

IP Logged

Aussie Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 38856 Gender:	Re: Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest Reply #84 - Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:34pm Concentrate melielongtime....concentrate. Way back in the days of all that 'begatting' who was doing the begatting?
Back to top	IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest
Reply #85 - Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:35pm

____ wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:31pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:23pm:

____ wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:21pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:09pm:

____ wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:05pm:

So Longweekend, what is wrong with two consenting adult brothers having sex, since there is no chance of reproduction, and so inbreeding.

Please note this is a question, not a statement of my position on the topic. Spelling it out since you seem a little slow on the topic.

even asking that question implies you support for gay incest. you do realise that 'inbreeding' is only one of the reasons for the ages-long taboo against incest?

The question concerned morality and how you justified it within your mind.
Obviously, it is beyond your intelligence to rationalise such a complex process. I now understand your cultist life, in that you don't have to think for yourself.

what would YOU know about morality (or any other topic for that matter)? YOU are the pro-incest weirdo, not me.

I am hoping to learn from your concept of morality.

Now I'm not a brain dead zombie in a bible class so you will require a logical position to win me over.

What are the perimeter so to frame your moral position on bro on bro incest?

id be more interested to hear your position on sis-bro incest or sis-sis or are you only able to think in purely gay terms? if you are pro-incest then you are pro ALL incest not just gay incest lest you be accused loudly of being against 'incest equality'!

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Why won't Longy answer?
Reply #86 - Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:39pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:34pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:28pm:

A) I never said I want to and

So, you support incest.

B) why dont you have a problem with incest? and...

Between same sex couples, there is no problem. [color=#0000ff]Why do you have a problem?why only gay incest? what is wrong with hetero-incest. people do know how to use condoms you know. For someone who scream 'sexual equality' as often as you do that is a curious distinction and bias.

C) if incest is of no concern, why does age figure into it?

Because kiddies can't give informed consent. Incest and pedophilia are two different things, Longy.

Post pubescents are not kids. Incest is a far stronger prohibition than adolescent sex and yet the former is no problem to you.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

greggerypeccary Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 139530 Gender:	Why doesn't Longy answer questions? Reply #87 - Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:43pm Aussie wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:34pm: Concentrate melielongtime....concentrate. That's never gonna happen.
Back to top	IP Logged

____

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 33410
Australia
Gender: male

Re: Greens to launch a drive to legalise incest
Reply #88 - Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:49pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:35pm:

____ wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:31pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:23pm:

____ wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:21pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:09pm:

____ wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:05pm:

So Longweekend, what is wrong with two consenting adult brothers having sex, since there is no chance of reproduction, and so inbreeding.

Please note this is a question, not a statement of my position on the topic. Spelling it out since you seem a little slow on the topic.

even asking that question implies you support for gay incest. you do realise that 'inbreeding' is only one of the reasons for the ages-long taboo against incest?

The question concerned morality and how you justified it within your mind.
Obviously, it is beyond your intelligence to rationalise such a complex process. I now understand your cultist life, in that you don't have to think for yourself.

what would YOU know about morality (or any other topic for that matter)? YOU are the pro-incest weirdo, not me.

I am hoping to learn from your concept of morality.

Now I'm not a brain dead zombie in a bible class so you will require a logical position to win me over.

What are the perimeter so to frame your moral position on bro on bro incest?

id be more interested to hear your position on sis-bro incest or sis-sis or are you only able to think in purely gay terms? if you are pro-incest then you are pro ALL incest not just gay incest lest you be accused loudly of being against 'incest equality'!

My position is pivotal and waiting on your explanation of how your moral position is formed concerning a bro on bro relationship. If you can sell me on this, then I will likely be lock, stock, and barrel in agreement with you on a number ot things.

Can you sell your position to me and all the other reader?

Jesus is waiting for you to shine his light here ... don't disappoint him.

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 139530 Gender:	Re: Why won't Longy answer? Reply #89 - Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:53pm longweekend58 wrote on Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 6:39pm: Incest is a far stronger prohibition than adolescent sex ... So you keep saying, yet you can't explain why? Could you explain it to me now, please?
Back to top	IP Logged

Poll
Question: which best describes longstupidone
* This poll has now closed *
scared the libs will lose 0 (0.0%) panicking the libs will lose 0 (0.0%) shitting himself 1 (4.3%) an idiot 0 (0.0%) a cretin 0 (0.0%) a liar 0 (0.0%) all of the above 22 (95.7%) Total votes: 23 « Last Modified by: John Smith on: Jul 3^rd, 2015 at 10:48am »