SadKangaroo wrote on Apr 1^st, 2018 at 8:15am:

it_is_the_light wrote on Apr 1^st, 2018 at 8:41am:


He is talking about density of objected but then starts to talk about "weight" or how "heavy" something is.

Firstly, the poster of the video doesn't seem to understand the difference between weight and mass, and second, he doesn't appear to understand how "weight" works.

For something to have weight, it requires gravity.  He is replacing that with magic.  Literally.  And for someone trying to talk about mass, he questions why nothing will orbit a tennis ball like it does the earth while the whole experiment is within the gravitational influence of the earth, that is, a few meters if you're lucky above the surface.  Does he not understand the gargantuant difference in mass between our entire planet, and a smacking tennis ball!?

And you want to take what he is saying as gospel truth!?

He is using plausible sounding logic and "sciencey sounding words" for people who are stupid, people who have been failed by their respective education systems, to sucker them in to thinking he has found a hidden truth and has been able to prove it with science.

It's bullshit. 

"There is no Gravity, it's the density of things that make a brick heavier than a feather and this makes it fall faster"

But what force acts upon it to make it fall in the first place?  It's not gravity, therefore it must be magic.

And then "The velocity and path of the moon are uniform and should exert a uniform influence on the earth's tides, but in actuality the earth's tides vary greatly".

Firstly, he doesn't understand the gravitational link and how the tides actually work, and second the moon's path and velocity are not uniform.  He's just plain wrong.

You don't question that?

Watch the video, the guy offers no explanation, just more contradictions and most of all, he offers zero proof and not even a cogent all encompassing explanation, not even close. 

Let this YouTuber publish his ideas and see if the can meet the burden of peer review.

Gravity is not "magic" just because this fool, like yourself, doesn't understand it.

The thing about gravity and how well understood it is allows us to chart the movements of object in the solar system.  Planets, asteroids, comets, the moon, the space station etc, with absolute precision, so much so that the path of solar eclipses has been mapped out for milenia to come and the most recent one had a 100% understanding of the best places to be to see it in it's totality.

Nothing you have brought to the table comes close to putting forward a hypothesis to challenge this.  You're not even in the same galaxy of being able to make any claims like Gravity doesn't exist.

Just because there are other stupid people like you posting comments in support of this rubbish does not make it true.

I suggest YOU actually watch the video.  If you still think he has presented an explanation that disproves gravity, please articulate it for us all so we can better understand it.

SadKangaroo wrote on Apr 1^st, 2018 at 10:16am:


I'll do it for you, because I know you won't bother.  His video can be summed up as follows,

Basically, things fell down at different rates because of the laws of relative density of buoyancy.  The reason things fall down is because they are heavy.  So in every circumstance, a brick will fall faster than a feather.

This is his explanation to gravity.

Do you agree Light?

Do you think he needs to explain the force which acts upon the objects that make them fall in the first place, or is "magic" a good enough answer for you?

Frank wrote on Apr 1^st, 2018 at 10:29am:


many blessings soren , is anyone following you down here ? ok good

lets observe some facts here if you are interested ,

An Introduction to Flat Earth - 35 Flat Earth Questions Answered (Flat Earth Proof)

1. What does the Flat Earth look like? (0:15)
2. Where’s the edge? (1:09)
3. Where is the Sun on a Flat Earth? (2:07)
4. What about ships disappearing over the horizon? (3:02)
5. Why can’t I see across the oceans? (3:47)
6. How is circumnavigation possible on a Flat Earth? (4:22)
7. What about the Felix Baumgartner Red Bull Jump? (4:57)
8. What is underneath the Flat Earth? (5:45)
9. Does the Flat Earth move? (6:29)
10.  What about Satellites, ISS, and the Hubble Space Telescope? (7:23)
11. Why is the Moon upside down in the Southern Hemisphere? (9:02)
12. What about the pictures of Earth from Space? (9:39)
13. Is the Moonlight just reflection of the Sun’s light? (10:52)
14. What about stars and does Outer Space even exist? (12:18)
15. Why do the Sun and Moon appear to be the same size? (13:01)
16. What about eclipses? (13:48)
17. What about the Coriolis Effect? (15:23)
18. Are the other planets flat? (16:26)
19. What about Gravity? (17:26)
20. What about Seasons? (19:29)
21. What about Time Zones? (20:22)
22. What about the Moon and Mars Landings? (21:01)
23. What about seeing the curve from an airplane window? (22:20)
24. What about Foucault’s Pendulum? (23:11)
25. How do you explain North and South on a Flat Earth? (24:03)
26. What about meteors, comets, and craters? (24:55)
27. Is there a dome over the flat Earth? (26:39)
28. Is Flat Earth only for religious people? (27:32)
29. Does the Bible say the Earth is flat? (28:06)
30. What about the Flat Earth Society? (28:52)
31. Who is behind the deception? (30:16)
32. Why would they lie about Flat Earth? (31:17)
33. Are all Scientists, Pilots, Engineers, and members of the Government in on the lie? (32:26)
34. Who is spreading the Flat Earth message? (33:16)
35. Why does it matter if Earth is flat? (34:50)

Why don't we change gears and try something different.

Instead of you claiming to have proof the the earth is flat, having that "proof" debunked, pretending that it's still rock solid and you're the one that won the debate then spamming more and more, let's try this:

If it is so irrefutable to you that the earth is flat, gravity is fake and the Sun circles around the surface of a flat earth a mere 3000kms away creating day/night and the seasons while optical illusions account for the obvious setting of the sun below the horizon, you should be able to easily answer these questions.

I've just taken another photo now.  If the sun doesn't set or change it's level in the sky but just circles around the flat surface parallel to the earth, how is the top of the cloud illuminated but the lower side not (as the sun has already started to set)?

If there is no gravity and it's just boyancy and density making object fall to the surface, what force acts upon them to make them fall?

Here is the photo.



Now these aren't complex questions and should be basic children's level understanding, so please, I await your answers.

Thanks

it_is_the_light wrote on Apr 1^st, 2018 at 9:28pm:


I'm not asking for videos, I'm asking you to explain it.

If you can't I will take that as an admission of defeat.

it_is_the_light wrote on Apr 1^st, 2018 at 9:58pm:


I've posted so much that debunks your bullshit and you ignore it, so I'm asking you questions for once. Rather than you demanding we disprove your claims, but you're the judge of what is right or wrong (and of course you only rule in your own favour) I'm flipping it on its head.

I'm asking you to explain these very simple questions which seem to be the foundation of your belief.  It should be child's play.

But you won't do it. One would.be forgiven for thinking this means you can't, therefore you are defeated.

You're great at asking things of others but you just can't hack it when you're questioned.

Are your arguments really that weak?

It was fun light, but I'll take my victory and leave you to wallow in your defeat.

2 simple questions that you cannot answer.

I do nothing but play your game and answer your questions, which you ignore but I continue anyway. I give you chance after chance and you just return nothing but disrespect and lies.

Since you're unable to to answer, it seems like you can't. So enjoy your defeat.