freediver wrote on Jul 12
th, 2015 at 11:44am:
I certainly hope not. How did Muhammed err?
By being human - good enough?
Baronvonrort wrote on Jul 12
th, 2015 at 11:48am:
ou did not address you dismissed it as irrelevant because it contradicted your nonsense.
Do you think people reading abu dawud will see honey is a metaphor for sex?
I addressed it by saying its irrelevant. Not addressing it would be not saying anything. But happy to go with the honey=sex metaphor, it makes not one iota of difference to my point. The issue is not about honey vs sex, the issue is about Hafsah Muhammad's wife vs Mary the sex slave.
Baronvonrort wrote on Jul 12
th, 2015 at 11:48am:
You only have one out of 3 that mentions both incidents, the majority say it was about maria the copt and even your version mentions maria the copt.
No, Al Wahidi gives three separate narrations supporting the honey story - one for the coptic slave story.
Baronvonrort wrote on Jul 12
th, 2015 at 11:48am:
You also avoided Bukharis contradiction on whether this happened at Zainab's house or Hafsa's house, which house did it occur in or was bukhari referring to 2 separate incidents?
Ah. So tell me Baron - is your argument that 66:1-5 is definitely 100% about Mary the Coptic sex slave based on what altafsir and other "reputable" muslims say - or is it that there is actually a great deal of disagreement? Its about time you adopted a coherent position Baron. Asking a lot though I know.