Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 ... 14
Send Topic Print
Little Ice Age imminent? (Read 13591 times)
Swagman
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Beware of cheap imitations......

Posts: 15095
Illawarra NSW
Gender: male
Re: Little Ice Age imminent?
Reply #60 - Jul 10th, 2015 at 9:05pm
 
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Very_Vinnie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 539
Gender: male
Re: Little Ice Age imminent?
Reply #61 - Jul 11th, 2015 at 1:25pm
 
Very_Vinnie wrote on Jul 10th, 2015 at 7:40pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Jul 10th, 2015 at 9:59am:
Very_Vinnie wrote on Jul 9th, 2015 at 8:28pm:
Quote:
...  the effect will be offset by recent global warming
*
...




*
... Indicating - and a confirmation - that factors increasing global average temperatures remain a CONSTANT

So much for "Professor" David Rose's claim of "no rise in global average temperatures in 20 years" - when each year has STILL broken the record held by the previous year, more often than NOT







that is complete garbage.  the FACT is that the last 18 years has had no statistically valid change in temperature.




This fits in well with the "tin-foil hat theory" that N.A.S.A., the B.O.M. and the M.E.T. have secretly joined forces with the many nations of the world that are represented by their top climate scientists on the I.P.C.C. - with the devious plot to jointly falsify average global temperatures spanning the last two decades   






Can ANYONE explain how global average temperature records were broken - over a twenty year period that saw no rise in global average temperatures ?

(conspiracy theories, aside)




.
Back to top
 

There are those that look at things the way they are, and ask why?
I dream of things that never were, and ask why not?


- Robert Francis Kennedy
 
IP Logged
 
Swagman
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Beware of cheap imitations......

Posts: 15095
Illawarra NSW
Gender: male
Re: Little Ice Age imminent?
Reply #62 - Jul 11th, 2015 at 1:33pm
 
Natural
climate fluctuations  Shocked
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 18065
Gender: male
Re: Little Ice Age imminent?
Reply #63 - Jul 11th, 2015 at 1:34pm
 
Well BOM had over 200 recordings that had overnight temperatures higher than the same day maximum.

But that was only after homogenisation. It wasn't in the raw data.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
bogarde73
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Anti-Global & Contra Mundum

Posts: 18443
Gender: male
Re: Little Ice Age imminent?
Reply #64 - Jul 11th, 2015 at 1:49pm
 
The Little Ice Age of the 17th century (variously stated as being 1590 -, 1620-, 1640-1715) is thought to have contributed to a reduction of the world's population by a third.

They didn't all die of cold. But the failure of many harvests contributed to unrest and brutal wars around the world, along with religious disputes & plague. The Thirty Years War in Germany, revolutions & civil war in Britain, France, the Ottoman Empire and China were among the worst.

Strangely it seems there was a coincidence with the invention of Galileo's telescope and the observation of sunspots. Up to 1640 these were regularly observed and then suddenly ceased to appear until, I think, around 1680.

Any major or significant climatic change would be likely to cause ruptures in society. Wasn't there an upsurge in internal strife in England during a hot period in the early middle ages.
Back to top
 

Know the enemies of a civil society by their public behaviour, by their fraudulent claim to be liberal-progressive, by their propensity to lie and, above all, by their attachment to authoritarianism.
 
IP Logged
 
Swagman
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Beware of cheap imitations......

Posts: 15095
Illawarra NSW
Gender: male
Re: Little Ice Age imminent?
Reply #65 - Jul 11th, 2015 at 9:10pm
 
bogarde73 wrote on Jul 11th, 2015 at 1:49pm:
Strangely it seems there was a coincidence with the invention of Galileo's telescope and the observation of sunspots. Up to 1640 these were regularly observed and then suddenly ceased to appear until, I think, around 1680


The Maunder Minimum between 1645 and 1715

...

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
President Elect, The Mechanic
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17501
Gender: male
Re: Little Ice Age imminent?
Reply #66 - Jul 11th, 2015 at 9:34pm
 
I know it seems like the coldest year on record..

but really gentlemen..

its been the hottest year ever because of us scientist are sure the heat is hidden under the sea because heat sinks and not rises as popular theory might say...

yep..

global warming is alive and well.. Smiley
Back to top
 

Q

The STORM has arrived
Every Dog Has Its Day...
Dark to Light.
Sheep no more.
 
IP Logged
 
The_Barnacle
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6205
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Little Ice Age imminent?
Reply #67 - Jul 12th, 2015 at 10:56am
 
longweekend58 wrote on Jul 10th, 2015 at 10:02am:
The_Barnacle wrote on Jul 9th, 2015 at 10:17pm:
All things being equal, if you increase the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere you will produce warming. That is pretty basic science.   


Except it isnt true or that simple.  CO2 concentration shave been increasing in the last 20 years and yet temperature has not.  That conclusively disproves the theory of a linear simplistic relationship.




No it doesn't. The reason there hasn't been a simplistic linear increase in temperature is that there are a lot of other variables. But the TREND is that temperatures are increasing.

You go on about "statistically insignificant" increases but you ignore the fact that 18 years is statistically insignificant when you are talking about global climate change over many decades. You also conveniently ignore the cherry picking of 1998 as the aledged start of the pause which was a year of unprecedented el nino inspired warming.

And then you have the cheek to join the tin foil hat brigade and claim there is some massive conspiracy theory amongst all the world scientists.
Back to top
 

The Right Wing only believe in free speech when they agree with what is being said.
 
IP Logged
 
Rider
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2669
OnTheRoad
Gender: male
Re: Little Ice Age imminent?
Reply #68 - Jul 12th, 2015 at 11:16am
 
lee wrote on Jul 11th, 2015 at 1:34pm:
Well BOM had over 200 recordings that had overnight temperatures higher than the same day maximum.

But that was only after homogenisation. It wasn't in the raw data.


So Raw data + homogenization (selective sampling) = New Records.

Got it. No grounds for suspicion there.......No conspiracy theory required.

Simple fraud to maintain and / or enhance their tax payer funded budgets.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
The_Barnacle
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6205
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Little Ice Age imminent?
Reply #69 - Jul 12th, 2015 at 11:59am
 
lee wrote on Jul 11th, 2015 at 1:34pm:
Well BOM had over 200 recordings that had overnight temperatures higher than the same day maximum.

But that was only after homogenisation. It wasn't in the raw data.


That's quote an extraordinary claim Lee.
Do you have even the slightest evidence to back that up?
Otherwise I'm calling BS
Back to top
 

The Right Wing only believe in free speech when they agree with what is being said.
 
IP Logged
 
Very_Vinnie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 539
Gender: male
Re: Little Ice Age imminent?
Reply #70 - Jul 12th, 2015 at 12:13pm
 
The_Barnacle wrote on Jul 12th, 2015 at 10:56am:
longweekend58 wrote on Jul 10th, 2015 at 10:02am:
The_Barnacle wrote on Jul 9th, 2015 at 10:17pm:
All things being equal, if you increase the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere you will produce warming. That is pretty basic science.   


Except it isnt true or that simple.  CO2 concentrations have been increasing in the last 20 years and yet temperature has not.  That conclusively disproves the theory of a linear simplistic relationship.




No it doesn't. The reason there hasn't been a simplistic linear increase in temperature is that there are a lot of other variables. But the TREND is that temperatures are increasing.

You go on about "statistically insignificant" increases but you ignore the fact that 18 years is statistically insignificant when you are talking about global climate change over many decades. You also conveniently ignore the cherry picking of 1998 as the aledged start of the pause which was a year of unprecedented el nino inspired warming.

And then you have the cheek to join the tin foil hat brigade and claim there is some massive conspiracy theory amongst all the world scientists.







January 22, 2015, 10:28 PST 

The 10 warmest years: Not exactly forever ago

Last week NASA and NOAA announced that 2014 topped the list of hottest years ever recorded.
What’s worse, the ten warmest years ever recorded have all occurred since 1998.

http://climate.nasa.gov/blog/2224





Back to top
« Last Edit: Jul 12th, 2015 at 12:20pm by Very_Vinnie »  

There are those that look at things the way they are, and ask why?
I dream of things that never were, and ask why not?


- Robert Francis Kennedy
 
IP Logged
 
gizmo_2655
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male
Re: Little Ice Age imminent?
Reply #71 - Jul 12th, 2015 at 1:43pm
 
Very_Vinnie wrote on Jul 12th, 2015 at 12:13pm:
The_Barnacle wrote on Jul 12th, 2015 at 10:56am:
longweekend58 wrote on Jul 10th, 2015 at 10:02am:
The_Barnacle wrote on Jul 9th, 2015 at 10:17pm:
All things being equal, if you increase the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere you will produce warming. That is pretty basic science.   


Except it isnt true or that simple.  CO2 concentrations have been increasing in the last 20 years and yet temperature has not.  That conclusively disproves the theory of a linear simplistic relationship.




No it doesn't. The reason there hasn't been a simplistic linear increase in temperature is that there are a lot of other variables. But the TREND is that temperatures are increasing.

You go on about "statistically insignificant" increases but you ignore the fact that 18 years is statistically insignificant when you are talking about global climate change over many decades. You also conveniently ignore the cherry picking of 1998 as the aledged start of the pause which was a year of unprecedented el nino inspired warming.

And then you have the cheek to join the tin foil hat brigade and claim there is some massive conspiracy theory amongst all the world scientists.







January 22, 2015, 10:28 PST 

The 10 warmest years: Not exactly forever ago

Last week NASA and NOAA announced that 2014 topped the list of hottest years ever recorded.
What’s worse, the ten warmest years [highlight]ever recorded have all occurred since 1998.[/highlight]

http://climate.nasa.gov/blog/2224



And???

Even if the warming is natural (which it most likely is), it would make perfect sense that the temperatures would be generally cooler (allowing for natural 'peaks and valleys') the further back towards the LIA you check.
Back to top
 

"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat
 
IP Logged
 
Ajax
Gold Member
*****
Offline


CO2 has never controlled
temperature on Earth

Posts: 10982
Australia
Gender: male
Re: Little Ice Age imminent?
Reply #72 - Jul 12th, 2015 at 2:05pm
 
The Earth has been getting warmer BUT its not because man has been emitting CO2 into the atmosphere.

AGW = mythology
Back to top
 

1. There has never been a more serious assault on our standard of living than Anthropogenic Global Warming..Ajax
2. "One hour of freedom is worth more than 40 years of slavery &  prison" Regas Feraeos
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 107183
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Little Ice Age imminent?
Reply #73 - Jul 12th, 2015 at 2:54pm
 
...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
The_Barnacle
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6205
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Little Ice Age imminent?
Reply #74 - Jul 13th, 2015 at 11:00am
 
gizmo_2655 wrote on Jul 12th, 2015 at 1:43pm:
Even if the warming is natural (which it most likely is),


Ajax wrote on Jul 12th, 2015 at 2:05pm:
The Earth has been getting warmer BUT its not because man has been emitting CO2 into the atmosphere.



Well at least we are making progress. The skeptics are grudgingly admitting that the earth is warming.
Now all that is required is a basic chemistry lesson on how CO2 is a greenhouse gas and how 7 billion people burning fossil fuels will inevitably change the make up of the atmosphere.
Back to top
 

The Right Wing only believe in free speech when they agree with what is being said.
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 ... 14
Send Topic Print