Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8
Send Topic Print
"There will be no Carbon Tax": Shorten (Read 4934 times)
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: "There will be no Carbon Tax": Shorten
Reply #60 - Jul 15th, 2015 at 8:49pm
 
John Smith wrote on Jul 15th, 2015 at 8:45pm:
Grin Grin Grin Grin

longies still making excuses

this latest one is a beauty ... the essay was supposed to be in support of a position they were really opposed to, but longie couldn't write about incest because he's opposed to it.  Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy


MORALLY opposed.  I know 'morals' are something you might not fully understand, but while I can write on most topics, i cannot and will not cross a moral boundary - not even for creative writing.

ONe day you may understand what convictions are but at the moment you probably think they are something courts hand out.
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 96716
Re: "There will be no Carbon Tax": Shorten
Reply #61 - Jul 15th, 2015 at 8:49pm
 
longweekend58 wrote on Jul 15th, 2015 at 8:42pm:
Aussie wrote on Jul 15th, 2015 at 7:01pm:
Secret Wars wrote on Jul 15th, 2015 at 6:47pm:
I watched the writing challenge with some interest.  Seemed  to me that those who were dissing the writing as not belonging to the poster presented no evidence and morover failed to respond to the challenge laid out by the one that was affronted. 

Major fails. 


The proof is and always was self evident. Melielongtime's usual writing/posting standard is crap, yet suddenly, he produces something which meets average levels of 'English.'  We now have convincing proof, given he was set a topic which he naturally would  not support (something vital to his challenge)...he was given plenty of time to prepare his essay....at the stated time, his Thread was opened....and it remains empty, thus confirming what I suspected.  He is a flake.

Quote:
Then aussie wanted to get involved and move it to a forum over which he had control.  Shocked


Odd you would see it that way.  All I did was get the challenge (initiated by melielongtime) past an impasse of melielongtime's creation, set the topics as he wanted, and provided the Threads.  I also was able (because I can control to some extent trashing of Threads) to ensure the participants had a fair go.  Melielongtime can still post his essay on incest, yet, of no surprise to me, he has not.  He is a proven flake.

Quote:
And I noticed that though the challenge was to write a piece that was contrary to the writers natural philosophy I can see much mischief making in future quotes being made and attributed. 


If there was mischief, that was the result of the terms of challenge set out by melielongtime.

Quote:
This forum is all levels of dodgy. 

Maybe it should be reduced to its essence, those that dissed the original post put up...or not, and that it occur in the thread where it originally happened.  Keeps it all neat that way. 


'Neat' is exactly how it was set up.  It is still very 'neat' and there is a gaping vacuum where melielongtime's essay is supposed to be.  He is a proven flake.



the explanation is obvious and yet far past your intelligence.  NO ONE is going to write a pro-incest article and you chose that because you knew it to be true.  Also, who elected you to decide that you twit.  The original concept was that those who chose to be part of it would write an article on a topic THEY chose.  My choices were pro-gay marriage or pro climate change.  You deliberately went out of your way to choose a topic i could not ever morally support.  I know that in your amoral world the idea of having a line you will not cross doesnt occur to you, but the rest of us do.

I am still waiting for a candidate willing to take on this challenge seriously and without the intervention of an idiot like you.

It is a very simple challenge with very simple rules and to date... without a taker other than me.


Longy thinks it’s a topic he has to morally support.

No worries, Longy. Let’s change the whole thing and go with that. Pick your topic. I accept your challenge.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 75273
Gender: male
Re: "There will be no Carbon Tax": Shorten
Reply #62 - Jul 15th, 2015 at 8:52pm
 
longweekend58 wrote on Jul 15th, 2015 at 8:49pm:
John Smith wrote on Jul 15th, 2015 at 8:45pm:
Grin Grin Grin Grin

longies still making excuses

this latest one is a beauty ... the essay was supposed to be in support of a position they were really opposed to, but longie couldn't write about incest because he's opposed to it.  Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy


MORALLY opposed.  I know 'morals' are something you might not fully understand, but while I can write on most topics, i cannot and will not cross a moral boundary - not even for creative writing.

ONe day you may understand what convictions are but at the moment you probably think they are something courts hand out.



you should have thought of that before issuing such an open challenge you idiot ... don't make excuses after the fact.

And I wouldn't be lecturing anyone about conviction if I was you, If you really had any sort of conviction you'd take up your own challenge  Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 75273
Gender: male
Re: "There will be no Carbon Tax": Shorten
Reply #63 - Jul 15th, 2015 at 8:53pm
 
Karnal wrote on Jul 15th, 2015 at 8:49pm:
Longy thinks it’s a topic he has to morally support.

No worries, Longy. Let’s change the whole thing and go with that. Pick your topic. I accept your challenge.



Grin Grin Grin Grin

next week it'll change to it has to be something he supports, he can't write about something he's opposed to. Cheesy Cheesy
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 75273
Gender: male
Re: "There will be no Carbon Tax": Shorten
Reply #64 - Jul 15th, 2015 at 8:56pm
 
longweekend58 wrote on Jul 15th, 2015 at 8:45pm:
Kat wrote on Jul 15th, 2015 at 7:05pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Jul 15th, 2015 at 6:36pm:
President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Jul 15th, 2015 at 5:55pm:
I wouldn't bother replying to Kat... everyone knows that he's the forums Political Retard...  Roll Eyes



he is the forum's ANGRY retard.

Bicycle Boy should be his name



Make yourself useful, troll - go and emulate a camp-fire.


Thats the best you can do, bicycle boy?


you called for lefties to be bombed by terrorists so as to learn a lesson and you call Kat angry? You'll need to do better than that water boy. Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 96716
Re: "There will be no Carbon Tax": Shorten
Reply #65 - Jul 15th, 2015 at 8:59pm
 
John Smith wrote on Jul 15th, 2015 at 8:53pm:
Karnal wrote on Jul 15th, 2015 at 8:49pm:
Longy thinks it’s a topic he has to morally support.

No worries, Longy. Let’s change the whole thing and go with that. Pick your topic. I accept your challenge.



Grin Grin Grin Grin

next week it'll change to it has to be something he supports, he can't write about something he's opposed to. Cheesy Cheesy


Have you thought of accepting Longy’s challenge?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Ajax
Gold Member
*****
Offline


CO2 has never controlled
temperature on Earth

Posts: 10982
Australia
Gender: male
Re: "There will be no Carbon Tax": Shorten
Reply #66 - Jul 15th, 2015 at 9:00pm
 
Quote:
"The cost, paid by big polluters, will be passed through to the prices of the goods you buy." Julia Gillard


Quote:

"Australian households will ultimately bear the full cost of the carbon price."
Ross Garnaut, Labor Government Appointee and Author of the Climate Change Review


Quote:
"A carbon tax does not guarantee emissions reductions"
Former Labor Climate Change Minister Penny Wong


Quote:
"The introduction of a carbon price ahead of effective international action can lead to perverse incentives for such industries to relocate or source production offshore. There is no point in imposing a carbon price domestically which results in emissions and production transferring internationally for no environmental gain."
Australian Climate Change Minister Penny Wong 6 feb 2008


Quote:
"International carbon markets will cover billions of consumers this decade. Ask the bankers at your table whether they want Australia to clip that ticket. We’re going to help them get their share." Julia Gillard

www.pm.gov.au/press-office/speech-business-council-australia-dinner


Quote:
Generators have received $1 billion in government compensation money in the six months since the carbon price has been in place, the report prepared for lobby group Environment Victoria says.
The report estimates generators will receive between $2.3 billion and $5.4 billion, depending on the future carbon price, unless the compensation system is reviewed.
http://www.9news.com.au/national/2013/02/20/01/00/power-stations-reap-carbon-windfall-study


Back to top
 

1. There has never been a more serious assault on our standard of living than Anthropogenic Global Warming..Ajax
2. "One hour of freedom is worth more than 40 years of slavery &  prison" Regas Feraeos
 
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 38865
Gender: male
Re: "There will be no Carbon Tax": Shorten
Reply #67 - Jul 15th, 2015 at 9:01pm
 
Quote:
the explanation is obvious and yet far past your intelligence.


I doubt anyone will takes any further notice of your evaluation of another person's intelligence, given it is proven you are a blow hard sham.

Quote:
NO ONE is going to write a pro-incest article and you chose that because you knew it to be true.


That is a terrific and another example (proof) that you have not written the various OPs under question.  It does not make any sense.

Quote:
Also, who elected you to decide that you twit.


No-one did.  It was my (failed) attempt to move on.  And here we are still reading your pathetic excuses.  Tell you what melielongtime.  Choose your topic, PM me with it, and I'll set up a dedicated secure Thread for you to post your essay.

Quote:
The original concept was that those who chose to be part of it would write an article on a topic THEY chose.  My choices were pro-gay marriage or pro climate change.


Oh, so you wanted an easy way out.  Typical of a sham I suppose. 

Quote:
You deliberately went out of your way to choose a topic i could not ever morally support.  I know that in your amoral world the idea of having a line you will not cross doesnt occur to you, but the rest of us do.


Not at all.  Incest was quite topical at the time, and you were being quite the smart arse by half about it.  That it would be your topic was obvious like dog gonads and I doubt anyone here who was reading it all at the time would have been surprised you were given that topic.

Quote:
I am still waiting for a candidate willing to take on this challenge seriously and without the intervention of an idiot like you.


I reckon it is now established you ought be the last person to pass judgement on anyone else's degree of idiocy.  Yours is now quite clear.  You are a flake.

Quote:
It is a very simple challenge with very simple rules and to date... without a taker other than me.


You have two takers.  One has posted his essay (not chosen by himself) and two others have not.  Mr Peccary has not yet explained his delay.  You spat the dummy, and bolted.

You are a flake.  Do not be surprised when people treat you like a blow hard, noisy empty (let alone abusive) vessel.

Get on with it melielongtime.  Cease the prevarication. 
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Dnarever
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 59384
Here
Gender: male
Re: "There will be no Carbon Tax": Shorten
Reply #68 - Jul 15th, 2015 at 9:01pm
 
Karnal wrote on Jul 15th, 2015 at 8:20pm:
Aussie wrote on Jul 15th, 2015 at 8:10pm:
You're right Karnal.  I ought just lie about it all, or perhaps pretend it never happened, like melielongtime.


Well, it’s worked for Mr Abbott. He’s a conviction politician.

He’s that good.


Some people get 20 years for that type of conviction.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Grappler Deep State Feller
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 85457
Always was always will be HOME
Gender: male
Re: "There will be no Carbon Tax": Shorten
Reply #69 - Jul 15th, 2015 at 9:08pm
 
Karnal wrote on Jul 15th, 2015 at 8:49pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Jul 15th, 2015 at 8:42pm:
Aussie wrote on Jul 15th, 2015 at 7:01pm:
Secret Wars wrote on Jul 15th, 2015 at 6:47pm:
I watched the writing challenge with some interest.  Seemed  to me that those who were dissing the writing as not belonging to the poster presented no evidence and morover failed to respond to the challenge laid out by the one that was affronted. 

Major fails. 


The proof is and always was self evident. Melielongtime's usual writing/posting standard is crap, yet suddenly, he produces something which meets average levels of 'English.'  We now have convincing proof, given he was set a topic which he naturally would  not support (something vital to his challenge)...he was given plenty of time to prepare his essay....at the stated time, his Thread was opened....and it remains empty, thus confirming what I suspected.  He is a flake.

Quote:
Then aussie wanted to get involved and move it to a forum over which he had control.  Shocked


Odd you would see it that way.  All I did was get the challenge (initiated by melielongtime) past an impasse of melielongtime's creation, set the topics as he wanted, and provided the Threads.  I also was able (because I can control to some extent trashing of Threads) to ensure the participants had a fair go.  Melielongtime can still post his essay on incest, yet, of no surprise to me, he has not.  He is a proven flake.

Quote:
And I noticed that though the challenge was to write a piece that was contrary to the writers natural philosophy I can see much mischief making in future quotes being made and attributed. 


If there was mischief, that was the result of the terms of challenge set out by melielongtime.

Quote:
This forum is all levels of dodgy. 

Maybe it should be reduced to its essence, those that dissed the original post put up...or not, and that it occur in the thread where it originally happened.  Keeps it all neat that way. 


'Neat' is exactly how it was set up.  It is still very 'neat' and there is a gaping vacuum where melielongtime's essay is supposed to be.  He is a proven flake.



the explanation is obvious and yet far past your intelligence.  NO ONE is going to write a pro-incest article and you chose that because you knew it to be true.  Also, who elected you to decide that you twit.  The original concept was that those who chose to be part of it would write an article on a topic THEY chose.  My choices were pro-gay marriage or pro climate change.  You deliberately went out of your way to choose a topic i could not ever morally support.  I know that in your amoral world the idea of having a line you will not cross doesnt occur to you, but the rest of us do.

I am still waiting for a candidate willing to take on this challenge seriously and without the intervention of an idiot like you.

It is a very simple challenge with very simple rules and to date... without a taker other than me.


Longy thinks it’s a topic he has to morally support.

No worries, Longy. Let’s change the whole thing and go with that. Pick your topic. I accept your challenge.


Well Longie The Literate does like to open a sentence with a small letter....

e.g.:-

you need to start thinking mathematically since everything you say is just garbage...

Response:-  Can you show where my figures are wrong?

you're just a complete idiot and not worth talking to.....

No - Longie is not an angry kid troll at all.. he just writes and acts that way, in between singing in the choir at Hillsong alongside the NSW Police Commissioner.... now there's a scary thought.

Until Red came here I tended to assume that Monsieur Scipione was not too bad as a copper - but all political coppers are bad news for their own and the general public... and then I heard 'Hillsong Member'......
Back to top
 

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 96716
Re: "There will be no Carbon Tax": Shorten
Reply #70 - Jul 15th, 2015 at 9:10pm
 
Actually, Aussie, Longy agreed to write about gay incest if I wrote about paedophilia. He then had a fantasy about my being raided by the Feds at 3 in the morning, but I agreed. I still do.

If Longy stands by his challenge, I’ll write a serious article supporting paedophilia.

Agreed?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Dnarever
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 59384
Here
Gender: male
Re: "There will be no Carbon Tax": Shorten
Reply #71 - Jul 15th, 2015 at 9:24pm
 
Quote:
"There will be no Carbon Tax": Shorten


You could think that this topic is about Shorten saying there will be no carbon tax - you would be wrong.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
progressiveslol
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17029
Re: "There will be no Carbon Tax": Shorten
Reply #72 - Jul 15th, 2015 at 11:14pm
 
Isnt this next election going to be brilliant.

Labor cant (but will try and fail) use 'we are the workers friends' (if you like back room deals under secrecy and we getting a payoff in secret while you get less money). Work choices type arguments haha, dead.  Grin Grin

Labor cant just bring in a tax on carbon and try to call it anything but.

Labor cant use Abbotts university days. Been there done that

Labor cant use Abbott is a sexist. Been there done that.

Labor are screwed.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Jul 15th, 2015 at 11:19pm by progressiveslol »  
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: "There will be no Carbon Tax": Shorten
Reply #73 - Jul 15th, 2015 at 11:41pm
 
Karnal wrote on Jul 15th, 2015 at 8:49pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Jul 15th, 2015 at 8:42pm:
Aussie wrote on Jul 15th, 2015 at 7:01pm:
Secret Wars wrote on Jul 15th, 2015 at 6:47pm:
I watched the writing challenge with some interest.  Seemed  to me that those who were dissing the writing as not belonging to the poster presented no evidence and morover failed to respond to the challenge laid out by the one that was affronted. 

Major fails. 


The proof is and always was self evident. Melielongtime's usual writing/posting standard is crap, yet suddenly, he produces something which meets average levels of 'English.'  We now have convincing proof, given he was set a topic which he naturally would  not support (something vital to his challenge)...he was given plenty of time to prepare his essay....at the stated time, his Thread was opened....and it remains empty, thus confirming what I suspected.  He is a flake.

Quote:
Then aussie wanted to get involved and move it to a forum over which he had control.  Shocked


Odd you would see it that way.  All I did was get the challenge (initiated by melielongtime) past an impasse of melielongtime's creation, set the topics as he wanted, and provided the Threads.  I also was able (because I can control to some extent trashing of Threads) to ensure the participants had a fair go.  Melielongtime can still post his essay on incest, yet, of no surprise to me, he has not.  He is a proven flake.

Quote:
And I noticed that though the challenge was to write a piece that was contrary to the writers natural philosophy I can see much mischief making in future quotes being made and attributed. 


If there was mischief, that was the result of the terms of challenge set out by melielongtime.

Quote:
This forum is all levels of dodgy. 

Maybe it should be reduced to its essence, those that dissed the original post put up...or not, and that it occur in the thread where it originally happened.  Keeps it all neat that way. 


'Neat' is exactly how it was set up.  It is still very 'neat' and there is a gaping vacuum where melielongtime's essay is supposed to be.  He is a proven flake.



the explanation is obvious and yet far past your intelligence.  NO ONE is going to write a pro-incest article and you chose that because you knew it to be true.  Also, who elected you to decide that you twit.  The original concept was that those who chose to be part of it would write an article on a topic THEY chose.  My choices were pro-gay marriage or pro climate change.  You deliberately went out of your way to choose a topic i could not ever morally support.  I know that in your amoral world the idea of having a line you will not cross doesnt occur to you, but the rest of us do.

I am still waiting for a candidate willing to take on this challenge seriously and without the intervention of an idiot like you.

It is a very simple challenge with very simple rules and to date... without a taker other than me.


Longy thinks it’s a topic he has to morally support.

No worries, Longy. Let’s change the whole thing and go with that. Pick your topic. I accept your challenge.



why must you so dumb, stupid and incomprehensibly foolish?  Maybe as a buddhist the idea of right and wrong does not occur to you but there are actually lines which someone will NOT cross. Period.  You can write and posit a position you do not actually support but there are those places you do not go to EVER.

please.  write an article in support of paedophilia.  go  on. I dare you.  a serious one.  and when you refuse, maybe then you will understand.

or not.  I'm still guessing you wont.
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: "There will be no Carbon Tax": Shorten
Reply #74 - Jul 15th, 2015 at 11:42pm
 
Dnarever wrote on Jul 15th, 2015 at 9:24pm:
Quote:
"There will be no Carbon Tax": Shorten


You could think that this topic is about Shorten saying there will be no carbon tax - you would be wrong.



It got derailed by Aussie's pitiful disbelief that I wrote the OP.  He thinks everyone is as angry and illiterate as he is.
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8
Send Topic Print