Australian Politics Forum - In defence of Gay Marriage

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 35565
Gender: female

Re: In defence of Gay Marriage
Reply #135 - Aug 20^th, 2015 at 8:15pm

Soren wrote on Aug 20^th, 2015 at 8:13pm:

mothra wrote on Aug 20^th, 2015 at 7:47pm:

mariacostel wrote on Aug 20^th, 2015 at 7:45pm:

mothra wrote on Aug 20^th, 2015 at 7:14pm:

Didn't check out the references hen Soren?

It is very apparent you didn't.

it is astonishing how this gay marriage is seeming to become not about gay marriage at all. It is about proclaiming wide and far the 'rightness' of gay relationships even to the extent of being superior. Now we are expect to swallow the lie that gay marriage was a historical norm or even a historical event at all other than rare occasions.

Like it or not Mothra, heterosexuals are 99% of the population and gay marriage is virtually unknown prior to the 20th century. That joke wikipedia article refers to homosexual acts, not marriage. Presumably, you know the difference.

I did check out the references and the article speaks of formalisd unions.

No-one claimed it was ever the norm, just that there is precedent. Which there is.

It has zero precedent. Pederasty and homosexuality are no precendents for gay marriage.

You have provided a BS justification that simply doesn't withstand even a cursory scrutiny. Which is the norm for propagandists like you.

Again, didn't check out the references did you Soren?

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

Soren

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 25654
Gender: male

Re: In defence of Gay Marriage
Reply #136 - Aug 20^th, 2015 at 8:16pm

mothra wrote on Aug 20^th, 2015 at 7:14pm:

Didn't check out the references hen Soren?

Yes I did - that's why you are caught out as a f** all blustering propagandist. Your own 'proofs' and 'authorities' do not check out. I have checked. You haven't. You are a mindless drone good only fore unquestioning parrotting.

You are not credible at all, not in this topic, not in any other. You are a mere agitator.

Back to top

IP Logged

...

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 23673
WA
Gender: male

Re: In defence of Gay Marriage
Reply #137 - Aug 20^th, 2015 at 8:17pm

Soren wrote on Aug 20^th, 2015 at 8:13pm:

mothra wrote on Aug 20^th, 2015 at 7:47pm:

mariacostel wrote on Aug 20^th, 2015 at 7:45pm:

mothra wrote on Aug 20^th, 2015 at 7:14pm:

Didn't check out the references hen Soren?

It is very apparent you didn't.

it is astonishing how this gay marriage is seeming to become not about gay marriage at all. It is about proclaiming wide and far the 'rightness' of gay relationships even to the extent of being superior. Now we are expect to swallow the lie that gay marriage was a historical norm or even a historical event at all other than rare occasions.

Like it or not Mothra, heterosexuals are 99% of the population and gay marriage is virtually unknown prior to the 20th century. That joke wikipedia article refers to homosexual acts, not marriage. Presumably, you know the difference.

I did check out the references and the article speaks of formalisd unions.

No-one claimed it was ever the norm, just that there is precedent. Which there is.

It has zero precedent. Pederasty and homosexuality are no precendents for gay marriage.

You have provided a BS justification that simply doesn't withstand even a cursory scrutiny. Which is the norm for propagandists like you.

"We've always been at war with Eastasia"

Back to top

In the fullness of time...

IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 35565
Gender: female

Re: In defence of Gay Marriage
Reply #138 - Aug 20^th, 2015 at 8:20pm

Soren wrote on Aug 20^th, 2015 at 8:16pm:

mothra wrote on Aug 20^th, 2015 at 7:14pm:

Didn't check out the references hen Soren?

Yes I did - that's why you are caught out as a f** all blustering propagandist. Your own 'proofs' and 'authorities' do not check out. I have checked. You haven't. You are a mindless drone good only fore unquestioning parrotting.

You are not credible at all, not in this topic, not in any other. You are a mere agitator.

http://www.livescience.com/50725-same-sex-marriage-history.html

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

mothra Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 35565 Gender:	Re: In defence of Gay Marriage Reply #139 - Aug 20^th, 2015 at 8:23pm Whatever denials you wish to spew forth, there is precedent for same sex formalised unions in history. Marriage has not been an exclusively heteroexul institution.
Back to top	If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning. IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 139151
Gender: male

Re: In defence of Gay Marriage
Reply #140 - Aug 20^th, 2015 at 8:25pm

Soren wrote on Aug 20^th, 2015 at 8:16pm:

mothra wrote on Aug 20^th, 2015 at 7:14pm:

Didn't check out the references hen Soren?

Yes I did - that's why you are caught out as a f** all blustering propagandist. Your own 'proofs' and 'authorities' do not check out. I have checked. You haven't. You are a mindless drone good only fore unquestioning parrotting.

You are not credible at all, not in this topic, not in any other. You are a mere agitator.

This is always the sure sign that Sore End has lost the argument.

He resorts to extreme personal abuse, and then leaves the forum.

Congratulations, mothra.

Back to top

IP Logged

Agnes Gold Member Offline fish dinner Posts: 6081 Bedford Park rnd	Re: In defence of Gay Marriage Reply #141 - Aug 20^th, 2015 at 8:27pm yes mothra is suffering a bit of bullying atm- by the two who call themselves all knowing-
Back to top	x=^..^= x <o((((>< ~~~ x=^..^=x~~~x=^..^=x<o((((><~~~x=^..^=x farewell to days of wild abandon and freedom in the adriatic IP Logged

... Gold Member Offline Posts: 23673 WA Gender:	Re: In defence of Gay Marriage Reply #142 - Aug 20^th, 2015 at 8:29pm I love how mothra gets flustered and posts links from her first page of google results without any commentary or even highlighting pertinent points.
Back to top	In the fullness of time... IP Logged

mothra Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 35565 Gender:	Re: In defence of Gay Marriage Reply #143 - Aug 20^th, 2015 at 8:34pm I'm not flustered. I am right.
Back to top	If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning. IP Logged

... Gold Member Offline Posts: 23673 WA Gender:	Re: In defence of Gay Marriage Reply #144 - Aug 20^th, 2015 at 8:35pm Omm. Omm.
Back to top	In the fullness of time... IP Logged

greggerypeccary Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 139151 Gender:	Re: In defence of Gay Marriage Reply #145 - Aug 20^th, 2015 at 8:38pm mothra wrote on Aug 20^th, 2015 at 8:34pm: I'm not flustered. I am right. Indeed, you are. And Sore End just hates it when people with different opinions to his own are right. Unfortunately for him, it happens quite frequently.
Back to top	IP Logged

Agnes Gold Member Offline fish dinner Posts: 6081 Bedford Park rnd	Re: In defence of Gay Marriage Reply #146 - Aug 20^th, 2015 at 8:39pm LOL sore end !!!
Back to top	x=^..^= x <o((((>< ~~~ x=^..^=x~~~x=^..^=x<o((((><~~~x=^..^=x farewell to days of wild abandon and freedom in the adriatic IP Logged

mothra Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 35565 Gender:	Re: In defence of Gay Marriage Reply #147 - Aug 20^th, 2015 at 8:42pm Agnes wrote on Aug 20^th, 2015 at 8:39pm: LOL sore end !!! It explains why he is so irritable all of the time.
Back to top	If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning. IP Logged

Soren

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 25654
Gender: male

Re: In defence of Gay Marriage
Reply #148 - Aug 20^th, 2015 at 9:29pm

mothra wrote on Aug 20^th, 2015 at 8:23pm:

Whatever denials you wish to spew forth, there is precedent for same sex formalised unions in history.

Marriage has not been an exclusively heteroexul institution.

Nonsense.

There has been no society in the history of mankind that has ever recognised same sex relationships as equivalent to heterosexual marriage.

Not once, not a little bit, not in any way.

It is simply not true.

There has NEVER been any social recognition of same sex relationships as being equivalent to heterosexual marriage. Never, Nowhere. Ever.

This is very categorical - so you should have no problem with disproving it if right was on your side. But it isn't and so you will not be able to disprove it.

Back to top

IP Logged

Soren

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 25654
Gender: male

Re: In defence of Gay Marriage
Reply #149 - Aug 20^th, 2015 at 11:21pm

athos wrote on Aug 20^th, 2015 at 9:37pm:

Definitely a unisex positions

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-cYJOXX_fUzk/UooL4bQ0ayI/AAAAAAAADAo/otU674WspGc/s200/k...

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-erXV4d8kg2U/UooL7QdgPzI/AAAAAAAADBc/DzUGuBP4tk0/s200/k...

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-T8NSgfsME28/UooL2GnN9lI/AAAAAAAAC_Y/F6qCihO3NYE/s200/k...

Now we know what you are fapping to, you disgusting little Russian peasant.

Back to top

IP Logged