Australian Politics Forum - In defence of Gay Marriage

greggerypeccary Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 140073 Gender:	Re: In defence of Gay Marriage Reply #390 - Jan 4^th, 2017 at 8:34pm Gordon wrote on Jan 4^th, 2017 at 8:32pm: An unhealthy diet has worse health implications than contracting aids these days. And let's not forget, gay marriage has nothing to do with AIDS.
Back to top	IP Logged

Karnal Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 96862	Re: In defence of Gay Marriage Reply #391 - Jan 4^th, 2017 at 8:35pm Don't you hate it when they switch the topic away from you, Longy, and back to the subject? So unfair.
Back to top	IP Logged

Gordon

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 20832
Gordon
Gender: male

Re: In defence of Gay Marriage
Reply #392 - Jan 4^th, 2017 at 8:45pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 4^th, 2017 at 8:34pm:

[quote author=Gordon link=1437032296/389#389 date=1483525967]An unhealthy diet has worse health implications than contracting aids these days.

And let's not forget, gay marriage has nothing to do with AIDS.

[D/quote]

You could argue gay marriage would reduce the spread of AIDS as it would somewhat reduce their number of sexual partners

Back to top

« Last Edit: Jan 4^th, 2017 at 8:51pm by Gordon »

IBI

IP Logged

greggerypeccary Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 140073 Gender:	Re: In defence of Gay Marriage Reply #393 - Jan 4^th, 2017 at 9:48pm .
Back to top	IP Logged

Bobby. Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 107388 Melbourne Gender:	Re: In defence of Gay Marriage Reply #394 - Jan 5^th, 2017 at 7:04am Trust Longy to write an article supporting homos. Longy - what happened when you were a choir boy? Spell it out - you'll feel better.
Back to top	IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: In defence of Gay Marriage
Reply #395 - Jan 5^th, 2017 at 3:59pm

This thread was a bit of a blast from the past and quite entertaining. I read my article and then the spluttering objections from Karnal-the-jealous who apparently couldnt cope with how good it was and so had to resort to claiming i didnt write it. it is just as funny the second time as it was the first!

And on and on and on did Karnal-the-beaten go! Couldnt possibly believe that I wrote that and for some of the stupidest reasons ever.

it's been fun, karnal-the-loser. You are a terrible competitor and a hopelessly poor loser.

Maybe you can try again some day when you've practised some more.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

Setanta

Gold Member

Offline

\/ Peace man!

Posts: 16671
Northern NSW
Gender: male

Re: In defence of Gay Marriage
Reply #396 - Jan 6^th, 2017 at 12:17am

Gordon wrote on Jan 4^th, 2017 at 8:45pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 4^th, 2017 at 8:34pm:

Gordon wrote on Jan 4^th, 2017 at 8:32pm:

An unhealthy diet has worse health implications than contracting aids these days.

And let's not forget, gay marriage has nothing to do with AIDS.

You could argue gay marriage would reduce the spread of AIDS as it would somewhat reduce their number of sexual partners

It could double it! "Hey honey partner of mine, want to go visit the glory hole together?"

Back to top

IP Logged

issuevoter Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 9200 The Great State of Mind Gender:	Re: In defence of Gay Marriage Reply #397 - Jan 6^th, 2017 at 7:12am So called "Gay Marriage" belittles the actual institution, which has always been the intention of the liberal-progressive agenda.
Back to top	No political allegiance. No philosophy. No religion. IP Logged

Jovial Monk Gold Member Offline Dogs not cats! Posts: 48027 Gender:	Re: In defence of Gay Marriage Reply #398 - Jan 6^th, 2017 at 7:14am issuevoter wrote on Jan 6^th, 2017 at 7:12am: So called "Gay Marriage" belittles the actual institution, which has always been the intention of the liberal-progressive agenda. How?
Back to top	Get the vaxx! 💉💉 If you don’t like abortions ignore them like you do school shootings. IP Logged

longweekend58 Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 45675 Gender:	Re: In defence of Gay Marriage Reply #399 - Jan 6^th, 2017 at 7:21am Jovial Monk wrote on Jan 6^th, 2017 at 7:14am: issuevoter wrote on Jan 6^th, 2017 at 7:12am: So called "Gay Marriage" belittles the actual institution, which has always been the intention of the liberal-progressive agenda. How? Because marriage is an INTRINSICALLY heterosexual institution.
Back to top	AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..." IP Logged

Jovial Monk Gold Member Offline Dogs not cats! Posts: 48027 Gender:	Re: In defence of Gay Marriage Reply #400 - Jan 6^th, 2017 at 7:24am No, nothing to do with it. Try again.
Back to top	Get the vaxx! 💉💉 If you don’t like abortions ignore them like you do school shootings. IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: In defence of Gay Marriage
Reply #401 - Jan 6^th, 2017 at 7:26am

Jovial Monk wrote on Jan 6^th, 2017 at 7:24am:

No, nothing to do with it.

Try again.

Do you understand the concept of an 'opposing argument'? it is a bit more than putting fingers in your ears and shaking your head.

Try again. Marriage is an INTRINSICALLY HETEROSEXUAL institution, something that a smart person wouldnt even question.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

Jovial Monk Gold Member Offline Dogs not cats! Posts: 48027 Gender:	Re: In defence of Gay Marriage Reply #402 - Jan 6^th, 2017 at 7:29am Nope, nothing that can’t be changed now gay relationships are legal. Time to take the next step—marriage equality. What does harm the institution of marriage: serial monogamy, marrying and divorcing several times.
Back to top	Get the vaxx! 💉💉 If you don’t like abortions ignore them like you do school shootings. IP Logged

longweekend58 Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 45675 Gender:	Re: In defence of Gay Marriage Reply #403 - Jan 6^th, 2017 at 7:35am Jovial Monk wrote on Jan 6^th, 2017 at 7:29am: Nope, nothing that can’t be changed now gay relationships are legal. Time to take the next step—marriage equality. What does harm the institution of marriage: serial monogamy, marrying and divorcing several times. You dont understand the term 'INTRINSICALLY'.
Back to top	AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..." IP Logged

Jovial Monk Gold Member Offline Dogs not cats! Posts: 48027 Gender:	Re: In defence of Gay Marriage Reply #404 - Jan 6^th, 2017 at 7:36am You don’t understand anything.
Back to top	Get the vaxx! 💉💉 If you don’t like abortions ignore them like you do school shootings. IP Logged