Australian Politics Forum - In defence of Gay Marriage

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: In defence of Gay Marriage
Reply #420 - Jan 6^th, 2017 at 8:59am

John Smith wrote on Jan 6^th, 2017 at 8:56am:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 6^th, 2017 at 7:47am:

. DEFEND YOUR POSITION.

If bobby and bigol marry it has absolutely nil effect on your marriage to your wife.

If you can show how it will affect it, you might have an argument.

If bobby screws his mother it will have no effect either. Doesnt mean we are planning to legalise that either. A bullet thru your head wont affect my marriage either but we are not planning to legalise that.

Why dont you try an argument with actual power - just to mix it up for a change.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 75367
Gender: male

Re: In defence of Gay Marriage
Reply #421 - Jan 6^th, 2017 at 9:02am

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 6^th, 2017 at 8:59am:

John Smith wrote on Jan 6^th, 2017 at 8:56am:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 6^th, 2017 at 7:47am:

. DEFEND YOUR POSITION.

If bobby and bigol marry it has absolutely nil effect on your marriage to your wife.

If you can show how it will affect it, you might have an argument.

If bobby screws his mother it will have no effect either. Doesnt mean we are planning to legalise that either. A bullet thru your head wont affect my marriage either but we are not planning to legalise that.

Why dont you try an argument with actual power - just to mix it up for a change.

you're asking monk to defend the position that gay marriage will not affect hetro marriage

and yet you can't show how one affects the other.

you're not real good at this debating thing are you? Grin

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

Jovial Monk Gold Member Offline Dogs not cats! Posts: 48012 Gender:	Re: In defence of Gay Marriage Reply #422 - Jan 6^th, 2017 at 9:02am Your whole argument, Longy, is just “change—NO!” phht
Back to top	Get the vaxx! 💉💉 If you don’t like abortions ignore them like you do school shootings. IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: In defence of Gay Marriage
Reply #423 - Jan 6^th, 2017 at 9:06am

John Smith wrote on Jan 6^th, 2017 at 9:02am:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 6^th, 2017 at 8:59am:

John Smith wrote on Jan 6^th, 2017 at 8:56am:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 6^th, 2017 at 7:47am:

. DEFEND YOUR POSITION.

If bobby and bigol marry it has absolutely nil effect on your marriage to your wife.

If you can show how it will affect it, you might have an argument.

If bobby screws his mother it will have no effect either. Doesnt mean we are planning to legalise that either. A bullet thru your head wont affect my marriage either but we are not planning to legalise that.

Why dont you try an argument with actual power - just to mix it up for a change.

you're asking monk to defend the position that gay marriage will not affect hetro marriage

and yet you can't show how one affects the other.

you're not real good at this debating thing are you? Grin

Have you ever heard of the moral argument of the ethical position? It states that some activities are simply wrong regardless of the effects. Stealing from your boss is simply wrong regardless of how much or whether it would ever affect him or not. Your argument is simply that anyone can do whatever they want as long as it doesnt significantly affect others. That essentially permits most crimes and bad behaviour.

Now I await your nonsensical reply indicating that you neither read nor understood the above.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 75367
Gender: male

Re: In defence of Gay Marriage
Reply #424 - Jan 6^th, 2017 at 9:12am

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 6^th, 2017 at 9:06am:

Have you ever heard of the moral argument of the ethical position? It states that some activities are simply wrong regardless of the effects. Stealing from your boss is simply wrong regardless of how much or whether it would ever affect him or not. Your argument is simply that anyone can do whatever they want as long as it doesnt significantly affect others. That essentially permits most crimes and bad behaviour.

Now I await your nonsensical reply indicating that you neither read nor understood the above.

you can shove your pretend morals and non existent ethics where the sun don't shine .

You asked Monk to defend something YOU admitted does not exist.

now, tell me about your ethics again, I love it when you highlight your hypocrisy? Cheesy

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

Johnnie Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 12485 Gender:	Re: In defence of Gay Marriage Reply #425 - Jan 6^th, 2017 at 9:21am Adults responsibility and human nature. The day after gay marriage is introduced children will be told sodomy etc is normal, its not. Will their be any long term effects of corrupting the vulnerable. The self interested homos don't care.
Back to top	IP Logged

Mr Hammer

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 25212
Gender: male

Re: In defence of Gay Marriage
Reply #426 - Jan 6^th, 2017 at 9:23am

I agree with your argument Longy. Add to that the fact that bad behaviour leads to a punishment. Stealing from the boss will get you sacked, your work history tarnished and you'll possibly be arrested. There is no punishment for homosexuality in Australia. Homosexuality is tolerated. This isn't about tolerance. This is about raising the status of homosexuality so that is equal to heterosexuality. Clearly it isn't. Cultural Marxists have made railing against the laws of nature their metier.

Back to top

IP Logged

Jovial Monk Gold Member Offline Dogs not cats! Posts: 48012 Gender:	Re: In defence of Gay Marriage Reply #427 - Jan 6^th, 2017 at 9:23am Johnnie wrote on Jan 6^th, 2017 at 9:21am: Adults responsibility and human nature. The day after gay marriage is introduced children will be told sodomy etc is normal, its not. Will their be any long term effects of corrupting the vulnerable. The self interested homos don't care. That is Longy level bulldust.
Back to top	Get the vaxx! 💉💉 If you don’t like abortions ignore them like you do school shootings. IP Logged

John Smith Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 75367 Gender:	Re: In defence of Gay Marriage Reply #428 - Jan 6^th, 2017 at 9:25am Johnnie wrote on Jan 6^th, 2017 at 9:21am: The day after gay marriage is introduced children will be told sodomy etc is normal, its not. sodomy is normal. It's practiced by about 40% of the population. Despite what you've been taught, its not something only gays do
Back to top	Our esteemed leader: I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus. IP Logged

John Smith Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 75367 Gender:	Re: In defence of Gay Marriage Reply #429 - Jan 6^th, 2017 at 9:26am Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 6^th, 2017 at 9:23am: I agree with your argument Longy. you mean his argument that homo and hetro marriage do not affect each other? bravo
Back to top	Our esteemed leader: I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus. IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 96853

Re: In defence of Gay Marriage
Reply #430 - Jan 6^th, 2017 at 9:27am

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 6^th, 2017 at 7:47am:

Jovial Monk wrote on Jan 6^th, 2017 at 7:42am:

How could ANY hetero marriage or the institution be damaged because a few homosexuals can marry?

You have not demonstrated that. Marriage will just go on falling slowly out of favor.

Merely restating your belief is NOT an argument. DEFEND YOUR POSITION.

The person who wrote the Rosa Parks speech tried to do that, Longy. Unfortunately they failed when they referenced a non-existent professor.

Plagiarism + fake referencing = fail.

Sorry about that. Why don't you try again?

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 140036
Gender: male

Re: In defence of Gay Marriage
Reply #431 - Jan 6^th, 2017 at 9:39am

Johnnie wrote on Jan 6^th, 2017 at 9:21am:

The day after gay marriage is introduced children will be told sodomy etc is normal, its not. Will their be any long term effects of corrupting the vulnerable. The self interested homos don't care.

I think you might need this: https://www.sane.org/mental-health-and-illness/facts-and-guides/treatments-for-m...

Back to top

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: In defence of Gay Marriage
Reply #432 - Jan 6^th, 2017 at 10:44am

John Smith wrote on Jan 6^th, 2017 at 9:25am:

Johnnie wrote on Jan 6^th, 2017 at 9:21am:

The day after gay marriage is introduced children will be told sodomy etc is normal, its not.

sodomy is normal. It's practiced by about 40% of the population. Despite what you've been taught, its not something only gays do

40%????

Id love to see your facts supporting this.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 96853

Re: In defence of Gay Marriage
Reply #433 - Jan 6^th, 2017 at 11:27am

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 6^th, 2017 at 10:44am:

John Smith wrote on Jan 6^th, 2017 at 9:25am:

Johnnie wrote on Jan 6^th, 2017 at 9:21am:

The day after gay marriage is introduced children will be told sodomy etc is normal, its not.

sodomy is normal. It's practiced by about 40% of the population. Despite what you've been taught, its not something only gays do

40%????

Id love to see your facts supporting this.

Would a fake Swedish professor help?

Back to top

IP Logged

Bobby. Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 107365 Melbourne Gender:	Re: In defence of Gay Marriage Reply #434 - Jan 6^th, 2017 at 11:45am Longy has started a thread which apologises for homos.
Back to top	IP Logged