Australian Politics Forum - In defence of Gay Marriage

greggerypeccary Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 140007 Gender:	Re: In defence of Gay Marriage Reply #615 - Jan 7^th, 2017 at 11:22am Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 7^th, 2017 at 11:16am: Not quite the same. Heterosexuals...penises and vaginas/sperm and ovum. Gays...penises and anuses/sperm and faeces. Hope this helps. I'm sure Sir Booby will be taking notes.
Back to top	IP Logged

Gordon

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 20816
Gordon
Gender: male

Re: In defence of Gay Marriage
Reply #616 - Jan 7^th, 2017 at 11:22am

Karnal wrote on Jan 7^th, 2017 at 11:20am:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 7^th, 2017 at 11:11am:

Pecker, if we have the plebicite and the 'nos' have it, you have to leave OP forever. Oh, hang on...

I still can't find your AIDS figures, dear. Would you care to admit the truth?

Why is HIV so common among straight couples in Africa?

Back to top

IBI

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 96815

Re: In defence of Gay Marriage
Reply #617 - Jan 7^th, 2017 at 11:23am

WN wrote on Jan 7^th, 2017 at 11:12am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 7^th, 2017 at 11:09am:

WN wrote on Jan 7^th, 2017 at 11:08am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 7^th, 2017 at 11:05am:

Heterosexuals do the exact same things.

Which is completely normal.

There you go, that wasn't so hard to admit.

What homosexuals do is completely normal - in your own words.

Nope what heterosexuals do is normal. What fairies do is perverted and sick.

Can you show the criteria for such sickness and perversion in the DSM V, Matty?

Back to top

IP Logged

Mr Hammer Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 25212 Gender:	Re: In defence of Gay Marriage Reply #618 - Jan 7^th, 2017 at 11:23am I hope you take notes. Them you won't perpetuate the lie that homosexual and heterosexual sex are equal.
Back to top	IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 96815

Re: In defence of Gay Marriage
Reply #619 - Jan 7^th, 2017 at 11:24am

Gordon wrote on Jan 7^th, 2017 at 11:22am:

Karnal wrote on Jan 7^th, 2017 at 11:20am:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 7^th, 2017 at 11:11am:

Pecker, if we have the plebicite and the 'nos' have it, you have to leave OP forever. Oh, hang on...

I still can't find your AIDS figures, dear. Would you care to admit the truth?

Why is HIV so common among straight couples in Africa?

Because they're tinted. How many times do you want me to say it?

Back to top

IP Logged

Gordon

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 20816
Gordon
Gender: male

Re: In defence of Gay Marriage
Reply #620 - Jan 7^th, 2017 at 11:26am

Karnal wrote on Jan 7^th, 2017 at 11:24am:

Gordon wrote on Jan 7^th, 2017 at 11:22am:

Karnal wrote on Jan 7^th, 2017 at 11:20am:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 7^th, 2017 at 11:11am:

Pecker, if we have the plebicite and the 'nos' have it, you have to leave OP forever. Oh, hang on...

I still can't find your AIDS figures, dear. Would you care to admit the truth?

Why is HIV so common among straight couples in Africa?

Because they're tinted. How many times do you want me to say it?

No its not. Did you know about the dry sex? Bet you didn't.

Back to top

IBI

IP Logged

greggerypeccary Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 140007 Gender:	Re: In defence of Gay Marriage Reply #621 - Jan 7^th, 2017 at 11:26am Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 7^th, 2017 at 11:23am: I hope you take notes. No need to: Sir Booby will send me his, in a PM. I'm guessing there will be a few stick figure drawings involved too.
Back to top	IP Logged

Karnal Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 96815	Re: In defence of Gay Marriage Reply #622 - Jan 7^th, 2017 at 11:27am Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 7^th, 2017 at 11:23am: I hope you take notes. Them you won't perpetuate the lie that homosexual and heterosexual sex are equal. That's true, Homo. One produces offspring - a crucial difference, and the reason for marriage in the first place. Where's your AIDS figures, dear?
Back to top	IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 96815

Re: In defence of Gay Marriage
Reply #623 - Jan 7^th, 2017 at 11:29am

Gordon wrote on Jan 7^th, 2017 at 11:26am:

Karnal wrote on Jan 7^th, 2017 at 11:24am:

Gordon wrote on Jan 7^th, 2017 at 11:22am:

Karnal wrote on Jan 7^th, 2017 at 11:20am:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 7^th, 2017 at 11:11am:

Pecker, if we have the plebicite and the 'nos' have it, you have to leave OP forever. Oh, hang on...

I still can't find your AIDS figures, dear. Would you care to admit the truth?

Why is HIV so common among straight couples in Africa?

Because they're tinted. How many times do you want me to say it?

No its not. Did you know about the dry sex? Bet you didn't.

Of course I know about dry penetration. Don't be ridiculous.

I practice it on Homo all the time.

Back to top

IP Logged

Karnal Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 96815	Re: In defence of Gay Marriage Reply #624 - Jan 7^th, 2017 at 11:29am greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 7^th, 2017 at 11:26am: Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 7^th, 2017 at 11:23am: I hope you take notes. No need to: Sir Booby will send me his, in a PM. I'm guessing there will be a few stick figure drawings involved too. How divine.
Back to top	IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: In defence of Gay Marriage
Reply #625 - Jan 7^th, 2017 at 11:33am

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 7^th, 2017 at 10:39am:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 7^th, 2017 at 7:50am:

Why don't we petition for those behaviours to be legalised? Could it be we find them objectionable?

Normal people don't find homosexuality or gay marriage objectionable.

You are the abnormal one here, Homo.

Get used to it.

Where do you get off defining unilaterally what people should or should not find objectionable? People are not only entitled to their opinions, they are entitled to express them without a minor intelligence like you questioning their motives.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

Gordon

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 20816
Gordon
Gender: male

Re: In defence of Gay Marriage
Reply #626 - Jan 7^th, 2017 at 11:35am

Karnal wrote on Jan 7^th, 2017 at 11:29am:

Gordon wrote on Jan 7^th, 2017 at 11:26am:

Karnal wrote on Jan 7^th, 2017 at 11:24am:

Gordon wrote on Jan 7^th, 2017 at 11:22am:

Karnal wrote on Jan 7^th, 2017 at 11:20am:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 7^th, 2017 at 11:11am:

Pecker, if we have the plebicite and the 'nos' have it, you have to leave OP forever. Oh, hang on...

I still can't find your AIDS figures, dear. Would you care to admit the truth?

Why is HIV so common among straight couples in Africa?

Because they're tinted. How many times do you want me to say it?

No its not. Did you know about the dry sex? Bet you didn't.

Of course I know about dry penetration. Don't be ridiculous.

I practice it on Homo all the time.

Lying again. Did your African maid in Dover Heights do it dry?

Back to top

IBI

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 140007
Gender: male

Re: In defence of Gay Marriage
Reply #627 - Jan 7^th, 2017 at 11:35am

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 7^th, 2017 at 11:33am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 7^th, 2017 at 10:39am:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 7^th, 2017 at 7:50am:

Why don't we petition for those behaviours to be legalised? Could it be we find them objectionable?

Normal people don't find homosexuality or gay marriage objectionable.

You are the abnormal one here, Homo.

Get used to it.

Where do you get off ...

I'm not telling (Sir Booby's listening).

Back to top

IP Logged

Mr Hammer Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 25212 Gender:	Re: In defence of Gay Marriage Reply #628 - Jan 7^th, 2017 at 11:41am Leftards reserve the right to be purveyors of all that is obectionable/allowable. Thats called 'demokracy'.
Back to top	IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 96815

Re: In defence of Gay Marriage
Reply #629 - Jan 7^th, 2017 at 11:51am

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 7^th, 2017 at 11:33am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 7^th, 2017 at 10:39am:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 7^th, 2017 at 7:50am:

Why don't we petition for those behaviours to be legalised? Could it be we find them objectionable?

Normal people don't find homosexuality or gay marriage objectionable.

You are the abnormal one here, Homo.

Get used to it.

Where do you get off defining unilaterally what people should or should not find objectionable? People are not only entitled to their opinions, they are entitled to express them without a minor intelligence like you questioning their motives.

They're entitled to their opinions about their own rights, Longy. They are not entitled to define the rights of others.

This is a philosophy known as liberalism. Another philosophy, conservatism, holds that change should happen incrementally, if at all.

Mind you, a certain conservative Swedish professor argues that the time for gay marriage is now.

Who to believe? The conservatives or the liberals?

Back to top

IP Logged