|
Mr Hammer
|
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 7 th, 2017 at 2:17pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 7 th, 2017 at 2:14pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 7 th, 2017 at 1:44pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 7 th, 2017 at 1:41pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 7 th, 2017 at 1:24pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 7 th, 2017 at 1:17pm: Gordon wrote on Jan 7 th, 2017 at 12:06pm: Karnal wrote on Jan 7 th, 2017 at 11:51am: longweekend58 wrote on Jan 7 th, 2017 at 11:33am: greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 7 th, 2017 at 10:39am: Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 7 th, 2017 at 7:50am: Why don't we petition for those behaviours to be legalised? Could it be we find them objectionable? Normal people don't find homosexuality or gay marriage objectionable. You are the abnormal one here, Homo. Get used to it. Where do you get off defining unilaterally what people should or should not find objectionable? People are not only entitled to their opinions, they are entitled to express them without a minor intelligence like you questioning their motives. They're entitled to their opinions about their own rights, Longy. They are not entitled to define the rights of others. This is a philosophy known as liberalism. Another philosophy, conservatism, holds that change should happen incrementally, if at all. Mind you, a certain conservative Swedish professor argues that the time for gay marriage is now. Who to believe? The conservatives or the liberals? Here's the thing. It's perfectly fine to be disgusted by the thought of what homos do, but also to be perfectly happy for them to do it in the privacy of their own home, married, single or what ever, because it really doesn't effect you. Gordon, in a democracy, the majority decides on the major policy changes by vote. Gay marriage isn't a major policy change, though. It requires a very minor change to the Marriage Act. That's what our politicians are paid to do. When gay marriage is legalised in the next few years, life will go on for the rest of us the same as it always has. Your irrational fears are based on ignorance, and bigotry - nothing more. At least 40% of the population of a largely Christian country believe it's a major policy change ... 40% isn't a majority, Homo. Sorry - you lose. That figure comes from the major socialist news services-the same news services that ganged up on Brexit and Trump. We all remember how accurate those polls were, eh Pecker? If you don't like the figure, why did you quote it? You seem to spend most of your "life" doing things you don't like. Isn't that a bit of a waste? Read carefully and try to understand, Pecker. I reckon a poll indicating that 40% of the population holding a position warrants a vote in itself. I believe the figure is higher than that. The leftist media underestimated the opposition to it's Matxist agenda in elections in England and America; the same is very possible for the gay marriage vote in Austrlia. Do I need to draw you a diagram?
|
Forum
Pages: 
In defence of Gay Marriage (Read 42752 times)
