It took you an hour to manufacture, in a passion you demanded of me, and come up with that fantasy garbage?  I don't believe you, and I never will again.  You plagiarised that make believe from someone else, and it was written some time ago.

You can prove me wrong by posting an essay, within that same hour from now, a passionate piece supporting the proposition that "There is no God and Jesus Christ is not the Son of God."

No make believe Professors this time.

Aussie wrote on Jul 16^th, 2015 at 7:47pm:


and you know exactly why I will not ever do that.  so you immature act is to try that on.

you got schooled, fake lawyer. COnned into a game you could never win. The next challenge is up and waiting for you.  Write a speech. any topic. let's see if you can make a high school effort this time.

mothra wrote on Jul 16^th, 2015 at 8:02pm:


what argument?  or is "i dont give a crap' the kind of argument that gives you goosebumps? Clearly if anyone wants to convince you of anything all they have to do is turn the airconditioning very low.

mothra wrote on Jul 16^th, 2015 at 8:09pm:


passion isnt much of a substitute for substance. You can find passion at a footy game, but not a lot of intelligence or logic being employed.

Gay Incest.

I support it completely.  Why not?  I guess Gay Incest involves sexual activity between brothers, or a father and son, male cousins, and similarly between sisters, a mother and daughter and female cousins.  Throw in aunts and uncles with nieces and nephews, and there you have a very unproductive melting pot, but presumably heights of passion.  (There’s  that word ~ passion, and I’ll come back to it.)

Exactly what is the problem with any of that, assuming it occurs (as the Law will require) with adult consent, and lack of power balance or any sense of compulsion.  If there is appropriate consent in the sense the Law and everyone would expect, why not?

Historically, I am sure there will be plenty of examples but I can’t be bothered looking.  It is irrelevant to my point.  Why ought we concern ourselves with the intercourse of whatever kind between two people if and when there is absolutely no negative to it?  If two brother blokes want to play tennis, and they get their jollies doing it, why should I or you care?  It’s none of our bloody business, is it.  Two brother blokes wrestle in the Olympic Games….get all very close and personal, and one gets an erection.  Embarrassing for him but, so what?  And……who cares if the combatants are brothers?  No me.  Why, you?

Way back at the dawn of prude, incest was frowned upon.  It was a genetic thing, or concern.  Not so much a social taboo, but explained on the basis that defects in the dna would be spread and thus the herd would be weakened.  I don’t even subscribe to that theory, because, at the end of the day, Mr Darwin’s theory of evolution blows it out of the water…..the fittest survive, so that’s the end of that wimpy whinge. 

So if two of the same sex get at it and there is zero chance of reproduction, who cares, and if so, why.  Buggered if I can think of any logical reason.  Precious pups like the ‘flake melielongtime of the righteous (???) indignation’ will drag out biblical propaganda and tell us that those who get their rocks off with their immediate family are doooooooomed to hell and damnation for eternity.  Oh well, there are always voodoo snake oil salesman on just about any topic.

What sort of test is applicable here.  Is it a NIMBY?  Is it the Pub Test?  Is it the recently developed ‘sniff test?’ Is it biological?  Nah, it cannot be that as is bleedingly obvious.  What are we left with?  Well, why ought it bother you if two brothers were living next door, and you knew they were screwing the crap out of each other? Seriously! 

Why is that any skin off your nose, any more than it worries you not that Mr and Mrs Deepthroat are doing the same at the other ‘next door?’

The ‘Pub Test.’  Yeas, I can imagine all those tradies, and bar flies swilling their schooners  to skin full level, and convincing each other ~ (before they left for home to beat the sheet out of their spouses and probably their kids) fist pumping their breasts and saying, “bloody poofter brothers, let’s get ‘em.  Hang ‘em high,” ~ that this is a real threat to their bar-room heroics.

As for the sniff failure.   Yeas, I can see it, but I reject it as bigotry.

At the end of the day, we are left with two people, brothers, sisters etc, who for reasons I cannot explain, are passionate about exploring sexual pleasure with each other.  Let them have their way I say. 

Why not!

is the idiot gloating that he won? 

doesn't he realise that he's not the judge?

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 16^th, 2015 at 8:30pm:



Yet it is required to make a compelling argument.

You failed to do just that.