longweekend58 wrote on Jul 16^th, 2015 at 9:25pm:


No.  That's yet another fabrication.  I regard it as tripe (you now admit it is all fakiry involving fake 'Professor' sources etc etc)  written ages ago, by some very young student of yours, and along with that article, you have archived the efforts of other students on various topics.  You squirmed and refused to contribute on the two topics you were given (of course,) because there was none (written by others) in your c drive library.  It is so obvious, melielongtime.

Quote:


You did get that right.

Quote:


"Fund?"  Nothing whatsoever is destroyed in Relationships.  To the extent I regard it as necessary, I keep it very, very tidy, and I also keep the Forum Vandals at bay.

Quote:


No.  It is there now, and can safely continue there.  Cowards can run away if they wish.

Your eyes will not bleed, melielongtime, and your keyboard will not melt.

John Smith wrote on Jul 16^th, 2015 at 9:32pm:



I am wondering when you realise that ever single word - including my 'source' was made up and written in its entirety by me.

It has been so much fun showing you lot up - ad it was surprisingly easy.

John Smith wrote on Jul 17^th, 2015 at 9:19am:



you mean the 10 words that said Rosa Parks got on a bus and ignited the civil rights movement?  wow...  imagine that.  and the remaining 1190 words?  did you read them?  could you even understand them?

and btw 'word for word' doesnt mean having 3 of the same words in a sentence, illiterate ignoramus.

[quote author=Aussie link=1437035145/0#0 date=1437035145]Gay Incest.

I support it completely.  Why not?  I guess Gay Incest involves sexual activity between brothers, or a father and son, male cousins, and similarly between sisters, a mother and daughter and female cousins.  Throw in aunts and uncles with nieces and nephews, and there you have a very unproductive melting pot, but presumably heights of passion.  (There’s  that word ~ passion, and I’ll come back to it.)

Exactly what is the problem with any of that, assuming it occurs (as the Law will require) with adult consent, and lack of power balance or any sense of compulsion.  If there is appropriate consent in the sense the Law and everyone would expect, why not?

Historically, I am sure there will be plenty of examples but I can’t be bothered looking.  It is irrelevant to my point.  Why ought we concern ourselves with the intercourse of whatever kind between two people if and when there is absolutely no negative to it?  If two brother blokes want to play tennis, and they get their jollies doing it, why should I or you care?  It’s none of our bloody business, is it.  Two brother blokes wrestle in the Olympic Games….get all very close and personal, and one gets an erection.  Embarrassing for him but, so what?  And……who cares if the combatants are brothers?  No me.  Why, you?

Way back at the dawn of prude, incest was frowned upon.  It was a genetic thing, or concern.  Not so much a social taboo, but explained on the basis that defects in the dna would be spread and thus the herd would be weakened.  I don’t even subscribe to that theory, because, at the end of the day, Mr Darwin’s theory of evolution blows it out of the water…..the fittest survive, so that’s the end of that wimpy whinge. 

So if two of the same sex get at it and there is zero chance of reproduction, who cares, and if so, why.  Buggered if I can think of any logical reason.  Precious pups like the ‘flake melielongtime of the righteous (???) indignation’ will drag out biblical propaganda and tell us that those who get their rocks off with their immediate family are doooooooomed to hell and damnation for eternity.  Oh well, there are always voodoo snake oil salesman on just about any topic.

What sort of test is applicable here.  Is it a NIMBY?  Is it the Pub Test?  Is it the recently developed ‘sniff test?’ Is it biological?  Nah, it cannot be that as is bleedingly obvious.  What are we left with?  Well, why ought it bother you if two brothers were living next door, and you knew they were screwing the crap out of each other? Seriously! 

Why is that any skin off your nose, any more than it worries you not that Mr and Mrs Deepthroat are doing the same at the other ‘next door?’

The ‘Pub Test.’  Yeas, I can imagine all those tradies, and bar flies swilling their schooners  to skin full level, and convincing each other ~ (before they left for home to beat the sheet out of their spouses and probably their kids) fist pumping their breasts and saying, “bloody poofter brothers, let’s get ‘em.  Hang ‘em high,” ~ that this is a real threat to their bar-room heroics.

As for the sniff failure.   Yeas, I can see it, but I reject it as bigotry.

At the end of the day, we are left with two people, brothers, sisters etc, who for reasons I cannot explain, are passionate about exploring sexual pleasure with each other.  Let them have their way I say. 

Why not

!/ [quote]

Because it is Sick, sick, sick.

Screw who ever you want even yourself but don't advertise it and impose on others. Lust is not love.
Leave normal people alone.

athos wrote on Jul 17^th, 2015 at 11:00am:


a key concept not understood by the bogan masses.

Karnal wrote on Jul 17^th, 2015 at 1:02pm:



When i asked, Longy claimed that he himself was the Professor.

He claims he was quoting himself all along.

Longy is, it has been made clear, seriously deluded.

Karnal wrote on Jul 17^th, 2015 at 1:38pm:



and the tantrum is STILL continueing.  how funny is that!

If you had any sense of honor Karnal, you would back your claim up that it was plagiarised with some evidence.  A claim made by you without evidence is worthless.  So are you up for the challenge of proving your case or are you goint to continue to claim lies without evidence?

I am guessing the latter will be your course of action because yes, I am that good.  You most certainly are not.