[quote author=Aussie link=1437035145/0#0 date=1437035145]Gay Incest.

I support it completely.  Why not?  I guess Gay Incest involves sexual activity between brothers, or a father and son, male cousins, and similarly between sisters, a mother and daughter and female cousins.  Throw in aunts and uncles with nieces and nephews, and there you have a very unproductive melting pot, but presumably heights of passion.  (There’s  that word ~ passion, and I’ll come back to it.)

Exactly what is the problem with any of that, assuming it occurs (as the Law will require) with adult consent, and lack of power balance or any sense of compulsion.  If there is appropriate consent in the sense the Law and everyone would expect, why not?

Historically, I am sure there will be plenty of examples but I can’t be bothered looking.  It is irrelevant to my point.  Why ought we concern ourselves with the intercourse of whatever kind between two people if and when there is absolutely no negative to it?  If two brother blokes want to play tennis, and they get their jollies doing it, why should I or you care?  It’s none of our bloody business, is it.  Two brother blokes wrestle in the Olympic Games….get all very close and personal, and one gets an erection.  Embarrassing for him but, so what?  And……who cares if the combatants are brothers?  No me.  Why, you?

Way back at the dawn of prude, incest was frowned upon.  It was a genetic thing, or concern.  Not so much a social taboo, but explained on the basis that defects in the dna would be spread and thus the herd would be weakened.  I don’t even subscribe to that theory, because, at the end of the day, Mr Darwin’s theory of evolution blows it out of the water…..the fittest survive, so that’s the end of that wimpy whinge. 

So if two of the same sex get at it and there is zero chance of reproduction, who cares, and if so, why.  Buggered if I can think of any logical reason.  Precious pups like the ‘flake melielongtime of the righteous (???) indignation’ will drag out biblical propaganda and tell us that those who get their rocks off with their immediate family are doooooooomed to hell and damnation for eternity.  Oh well, there are always voodoo snake oil salesman on just about any topic.

What sort of test is applicable here.  Is it a NIMBY?  Is it the Pub Test?  Is it the recently developed ‘sniff test?’ Is it biological?  Nah, it cannot be that as is bleedingly obvious.  What are we left with?  Well, why ought it bother you if two brothers were living next door, and you knew they were screwing the crap out of each other? Seriously! 

Why is that any skin off your nose, any more than it worries you not that Mr and Mrs Deepthroat are doing the same at the other ‘next door?’

The ‘Pub Test.’  Yeas, I can imagine all those tradies, and bar flies swilling their schooners  to skin full level, and convincing each other ~ (before they left for home to beat the sheet out of their spouses and probably their kids) fist pumping their breasts and saying, “bloody poofter brothers, let’s get ‘em.  Hang ‘em high,” ~ that this is a real threat to their bar-room heroics.

As for the sniff failure.   Yeas, I can see it, but I reject it as bigotry.

At the end of the day, we are left with two people, brothers, sisters etc, who for reasons I cannot explain, are passionate about exploring sexual pleasure with each other.  Let them have their way I say. 

Why not

!/ [quote]

Because it is Sick, sick, sick.

Screw who ever you want even yourself but don't advertise it and impose on others. Lust is not love.
Leave normal people alone.

mothra wrote on Jul 17^th, 2015 at 1:32pm:


The obvious question is why he would pretend to be a Swedish professor and a published writer, but I'm not going there.

It's clear enough now that he doesn't even write the threads he posts here.

Karnal wrote on Jul 17^th, 2015 at 1:38pm:



and the tantrum is STILL continueing.  how funny is that!

If you had any sense of honor Karnal, you would back your claim up that it was plagiarised with some evidence.  A claim made by you without evidence is worthless.  So are you up for the challenge of proving your case or are you goint to continue to claim lies without evidence?

I am guessing the latter will be your course of action because yes, I am that good.  You most certainly are not.

Karnal wrote on Jul 17^th, 2015 at 8:35pm:



your childish continuing tantrum has lost its shine. Now you just look pathetic. I can repeat my performance on other topics and in fact, will. and you will continue to claim they are plagiarised - despite providing zero evidence - because my writing is so, so much better than yours and often is aprofessional level.  That's kinda how I got my first book published.

karnal... the crying child.

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 18^th, 2015 at 12:06pm:


Longy, you know those aren’t your own words - you’ve admitted this already. Try not to get so worked up.

Everyone knows you have no published books. I once assumed you did - why would anyone lie about this?

But now I know - we all do. You can’t even write a 600 word essay.

If you spent your time trying to write decent arguments that aimed to persuade people of your views, you might be able to learn. Unfortunately, you just want to write about how good you are.

That’s right, Longy, you’re that good.

I'll let you know when my next book is complete and ready for publication.

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 18^th, 2015 at 5:08pm:



Cool.

Until then, what was your last book called?

I'd like to read it.