Australian Politics Forum - In support of Gay Incest.

Phemanderac

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 3507
Gender: male

Re: In support of Gay Incest.
Reply #75 - Jul 20^th, 2015 at 6:04pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 20^th, 2015 at 5:32pm:

Phemanderac wrote on Jul 19^th, 2015 at 3:22pm:

Longy, you want a bit of cred? Let someone else fully set the challenge, word limit, rules and time limit.

Then see how you go if anyone else takes up the challenge. Anything else is just you "roping" people in, it lacks honesty, credibility and demonstration of genuine writing skills.

Anything other than that is just you saying you won.... Oh wait!

That is a fine idea, but lacks one thing - a decent reasonable intelligent and intellectually honest person to run the Challenge. Aussie 'decided' that e would stup in - uninvited and unwanted of course - and declare that mytopic was to disprove the existence of God for the sole reason that he knows it is a topic I would refuse.

Now, if you want to step up and do soemthing about it then you are free to do so. I figured that three semi-reasonable people could so it as an un-marked exercise but bam and peccahead declined (of course) while Karnal - who is still throwing a tantrum - joined in.

You are welcome to do something about it.

So, it's ok with you if I set something up, but hey wait a minute, clearly, from the highlighted bits, I am not intelligent or intellectually honest either. It would seem that no one here (well seemingly apart from your good self) is...

Clearly then, the only obvious choice is for you to set it up.

Further, in a "real" competition a competitor would take what they get (as it were). What happens if a competitor does not wish to do the topic - they concede.

I have not bought into the "you did not write that piece...." argument quite deliberately. Whether or not I have doubts as to its authorship is totally irrelevant. My comments about your piece were on the piece itself. As I have maintained, by the way, it was not as good as you claim it was. Those reasons have all been laid out, plus a few other posters have pointed to some flaws. I would, respectfully, suggest that if in fact you are a serious writer, it is the negative comments that you would pay more heed to - that's how you will improve your skill set and that is also how you will write and appeal to a wider audience.

Back to top

On the 26th of January you are all invited to celebrate little white penal day...

"They're not rules as such, more like guidelines" Pirates of the Caribbean..

IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 38564
Gender: male

Re: In support of Gay Incest.
Reply #76 - Jul 20^th, 2015 at 6:07pm

Quote:

poor dear. bad day in the taxi? your writing was truly pitiful. it was no better than a longer than usual post and with precisely zero effort into making a case. You were an entirely unworthy candidate and remain so. The fact you and Karnal are unwilling to accept I even wrote my post is perhaps the most pitiful example of childish behavior I have seen here for some time and yet ironically, the best compliment you could pay. Didnt think that out beforehand, did you?

As far as I was concerned, I was producing an opinion piece on a subject you selected as one I would oppose. I never claimed to be a creative writer, and I have known from Primary/High School that I am not gifted in any way in that direction. Yet, when I need to tell a story based on facts in an interesting way (as I did with 'A Cabbies Day') which attracted tens of thousands of readers with every post I made, I can perform quite well.

When you accept your own criteria and write an opinion piece on a subject you do not support set by someone like me, I might listen to your sobbings about ~ "Oh dear, they don't believe me."

Back to top

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: In support of Gay Incest.
Reply #77 - Jul 20^th, 2015 at 6:12pm

Phemanderac wrote on Jul 20^th, 2015 at 6:04pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 20^th, 2015 at 5:32pm:

Phemanderac wrote on Jul 19^th, 2015 at 3:22pm:

Longy, you want a bit of cred? Let someone else fully set the challenge, word limit, rules and time limit.

Then see how you go if anyone else takes up the challenge. Anything else is just you "roping" people in, it lacks honesty, credibility and demonstration of genuine writing skills.

Anything other than that is just you saying you won.... Oh wait!

That is a fine idea, but lacks one thing - a decent reasonable intelligent and intellectually honest person to run the Challenge. Aussie 'decided' that e would stup in - uninvited and unwanted of course - and declare that mytopic was to disprove the existence of God for the sole reason that he knows it is a topic I would refuse.

Now, if you want to step up and do soemthing about it then you are free to do so. I figured that three semi-reasonable people could so it as an un-marked exercise but bam and peccahead declined (of course) while Karnal - who is still throwing a tantrum - joined in.

You are welcome to do something about it.

So, it's ok with you if I set something up, but hey wait a minute, clearly, from the highlighted bits, I am not intelligent or intellectually honest either. It would seem that no one here (well seemingly apart from your good self) is...

Clearly then, the only obvious choice is for you to set it up.

Further, in a "real" competition a competitor would take what they get (as it were). What happens if a competitor does not wish to do the topic - they concede.

I have not bought into the "you did not write that piece...." argument quite deliberately. Whether or not I have doubts as to its authorship is totally irrelevant. My comments about your piece were on the piece itself. As I have maintained, by the way, it was not as good as you claim it was. Those reasons have all been laid out, plus a few other posters have pointed to some flaws. I would, respectfully, suggest that if in fact you are a serious writer, it is the negative comments that you would pay more heed to - that's how you will improve your skill set and that is also how you will write and appeal to a wider audience.

a real competition would never suggest a topic that is massively unacceptable to any competitor. Would you for instance ask anyone to write in support of paedophilia? what about in support of the Holocaust or perhaps pro-slavery?

There is a real difference between writing for a position you are actually against and being asked to cross a moral line you are not prepared to do. The truly pitiful thing is that that needs to be explained.

as for your comments about my article... you may have a point, but the subsequent discussion went nowhere other than the claim it was plagiarised (without any proof). Its a bit hard to take serious some commentators who applaud Aussies support of incest based 100% on his disinterest in people's actions and my legnthy and substantial support for social evolution of gay marriage. Aussie could support murder, rape and peadophilia using his argument.

yes, I long for a serious and capable competition with people who can actually write and formulate arguments rather than merely quoting their ideology.

I would happily write a treatise on the proof of God, but that will never be asked for, in case I am too persuasive. Cant have that.

Now, are you going to take the job of reasonable moderator with reasonable topics?

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

Karnal Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 95430 Gender:	Re: In support of Gay Incest. Reply #78 - Jul 20^th, 2015 at 6:36pm Gee, Longy. It’s been almost a week. You’re still trying to clear your name. We know this is a subject close to your heart, but try not to get yourself in a tizz. Do try to stay balanced - for your own sake. You’ll always be free to express yourself here. No one cares whether you cut and paste or not.
Back to top	IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 38564
Gender: male

Re: In support of Gay Incest.
Reply #79 - Jul 20^th, 2015 at 6:36pm

Quote:

yes, I long for a serious and capable competition with people who can actually write and formulate arguments rather than merely quoting their ideology.

And do you really believe that 'you' did that by writing some wanky garbage and quoting some 'fictitious' academic 'you' reckon 'you' created (I acknowledge 'he' is fictitious) in support of 'your' views? 'Your' entire piece was centered on what 'you' reckon a fairy of 'your' own creation wrote!

Ferk me, I could write a bewdy if I was also allowed to cite fictitious sources I created! No-one could defeat me.

As I said, you have made a spot of worth in my Hall of Fame. Second on the list of those to buy at my price and sell at theirs.

Have a nice day, melielongtime.

Back to top

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 95430
Gender: male

Re: In support of Gay Incest.
Reply #80 - Jul 20^th, 2015 at 6:41pm

Phemanderac wrote on Jul 20^th, 2015 at 6:04pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 20^th, 2015 at 5:32pm:

Phemanderac wrote on Jul 19^th, 2015 at 3:22pm:

Longy, you want a bit of cred? Let someone else fully set the challenge, word limit, rules and time limit.

Then see how you go if anyone else takes up the challenge. Anything else is just you "roping" people in, it lacks honesty, credibility and demonstration of genuine writing skills.

Anything other than that is just you saying you won.... Oh wait!

That is a fine idea, but lacks one thing - a decent reasonable intelligent and intellectually honest person to run the Challenge. Aussie 'decided' that e would stup in - uninvited and unwanted of course - and declare that mytopic was to disprove the existence of God for the sole reason that he knows it is a topic I would refuse.

Now, if you want to step up and do soemthing about it then you are free to do so. I figured that three semi-reasonable people could so it as an un-marked exercise but bam and peccahead declined (of course) while Karnal - who is still throwing a tantrum - joined in.

You are welcome to do something about it.

So, it's ok with you if I set something up, but hey wait a minute, clearly, from the highlighted bits, I am not intelligent or intellectually honest either. It would seem that no one here (well seemingly apart from your good self) is...

Clearly then, the only obvious choice is for you to set it up.

Further, in a "real" competition a competitor would take what they get (as it were). What happens if a competitor does not wish to do the topic - they concede.

I have not bought into the "you did not write that piece...." argument quite deliberately. Whether or not I have doubts as to its authorship is totally irrelevant. My comments about your piece were on the piece itself. As I have maintained, by the way, it was not as good as you claim it was. Those reasons have all been laid out, plus a few other posters have pointed to some flaws. I would, respectfully, suggest that if in fact you are a serious writer, it is the negative comments that you would pay more heed to - that's how you will improve your skill set and that is also how you will write and appeal to a wider audience.

Please set something up, Phemanderac. I’d be happy to argue in support of paedophilia, the Holocaust or slavery. That’s the whole point of this excercise.

We"ll miss Longy’s endevours, but I welcome the challenge.

Back to top

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: In support of Gay Incest.
Reply #81 - Jul 20^th, 2015 at 6:46pm

Karnal wrote on Jul 20^th, 2015 at 6:41pm:

Phemanderac wrote on Jul 20^th, 2015 at 6:04pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 20^th, 2015 at 5:32pm:

Phemanderac wrote on Jul 19^th, 2015 at 3:22pm:

Longy, you want a bit of cred? Let someone else fully set the challenge, word limit, rules and time limit.

Then see how you go if anyone else takes up the challenge. Anything else is just you "roping" people in, it lacks honesty, credibility and demonstration of genuine writing skills.

Anything other than that is just you saying you won.... Oh wait!

That is a fine idea, but lacks one thing - a decent reasonable intelligent and intellectually honest person to run the Challenge. Aussie 'decided' that e would stup in - uninvited and unwanted of course - and declare that mytopic was to disprove the existence of God for the sole reason that he knows it is a topic I would refuse.

Now, if you want to step up and do soemthing about it then you are free to do so. I figured that three semi-reasonable people could so it as an un-marked exercise but bam and peccahead declined (of course) while Karnal - who is still throwing a tantrum - joined in.

You are welcome to do something about it.

So, it's ok with you if I set something up, but hey wait a minute, clearly, from the highlighted bits, I am not intelligent or intellectually honest either. It would seem that no one here (well seemingly apart from your good self) is...

Clearly then, the only obvious choice is for you to set it up.

Further, in a "real" competition a competitor would take what they get (as it were). What happens if a competitor does not wish to do the topic - they concede.

I have not bought into the "you did not write that piece...." argument quite deliberately. Whether or not I have doubts as to its authorship is totally irrelevant. My comments about your piece were on the piece itself. As I have maintained, by the way, it was not as good as you claim it was. Those reasons have all been laid out, plus a few other posters have pointed to some flaws. I would, respectfully, suggest that if in fact you are a serious writer, it is the negative comments that you would pay more heed to - that's how you will improve your skill set and that is also how you will write and appeal to a wider audience.

Please set something up, Phemanderac. I’d be happy to argue in support of paedophilia, the Holocaust or slavery. That’s the whole point of this excercise.

We"ll miss Longy’s endevours, but I welcome the challenge.

which is why we know you dont even get the point of the exercise. it is not about defending the indefensible you retarded twit, it is about defending a position you inherently disagree with.

sadly, you are way stupider than I previously thought. You try and use satire and comedy (and fail) as a substitute for having anything of substance to say.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 95430
Gender: male

Re: In support of Gay Incest.
Reply #82 - Jul 20^th, 2015 at 6:49pm

Aussie wrote on Jul 20^th, 2015 at 6:36pm:

Quote:

yes, I long for a serious and capable competition with people who can actually write and formulate arguments rather than merely quoting their ideology.

And do you really believe that 'you' did that by writing some wanky garbage and quoting some 'fictitious' academic 'you' reckon 'you' created (I acknowledge 'he' is fictitious) in support of 'your' views? 'Your' entire piece was centered on what 'you' reckon a fairy of 'your' own creation wrote!

Ferk me, I could write a bewdy if I was also allowed to cite fictitious sources I created! No-one could defeat me.

As I said, you have made a spot of worth in my Hall of Fame. Second on the list of those to buy at my price and sell at theirs.

Have a nice day, melielongtime.

Longy demonstrated how futile plagurism is. Not only did his attempt make no sense, it didn’t make a persuasive case for his argument.

It would have been a far more convincing piece of writing if he had just made a case in his own words, as you did. As it stands, Longy didn’t even enter a piece of his own writing.

He’s that good, you see.

Back to top

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 95430
Gender: male

Re: In support of Gay Incest.
Reply #83 - Jul 20^th, 2015 at 6:51pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 20^th, 2015 at 6:46pm:

Karnal wrote on Jul 20^th, 2015 at 6:41pm:

Phemanderac wrote on Jul 20^th, 2015 at 6:04pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 20^th, 2015 at 5:32pm:

Phemanderac wrote on Jul 19^th, 2015 at 3:22pm:

Longy, you want a bit of cred? Let someone else fully set the challenge, word limit, rules and time limit.

Then see how you go if anyone else takes up the challenge. Anything else is just you "roping" people in, it lacks honesty, credibility and demonstration of genuine writing skills.

Anything other than that is just you saying you won.... Oh wait!

That is a fine idea, but lacks one thing - a decent reasonable intelligent and intellectually honest person to run the Challenge. Aussie 'decided' that e would stup in - uninvited and unwanted of course - and declare that mytopic was to disprove the existence of God for the sole reason that he knows it is a topic I would refuse.

Now, if you want to step up and do soemthing about it then you are free to do so. I figured that three semi-reasonable people could so it as an un-marked exercise but bam and peccahead declined (of course) while Karnal - who is still throwing a tantrum - joined in.

You are welcome to do something about it.

So, it's ok with you if I set something up, but hey wait a minute, clearly, from the highlighted bits, I am not intelligent or intellectually honest either. It would seem that no one here (well seemingly apart from your good self) is...

Clearly then, the only obvious choice is for you to set it up.

Further, in a "real" competition a competitor would take what they get (as it were). What happens if a competitor does not wish to do the topic - they concede.

I have not bought into the "you did not write that piece...." argument quite deliberately. Whether or not I have doubts as to its authorship is totally irrelevant. My comments about your piece were on the piece itself. As I have maintained, by the way, it was not as good as you claim it was. Those reasons have all been laid out, plus a few other posters have pointed to some flaws. I would, respectfully, suggest that if in fact you are a serious writer, it is the negative comments that you would pay more heed to - that's how you will improve your skill set and that is also how you will write and appeal to a wider audience.

Please set something up, Phemanderac. I’d be happy to argue in support of paedophilia, the Holocaust or slavery. That’s the whole point of this excercise.

We"ll miss Longy’s endevours, but I welcome the challenge.

which is why we know you dont even get the point of the exercise. it is not about defending the indefensible you retarded twit, it is about defending a position you inherently disagree with.

sadly, you are way stupider than I previously thought. You try and use satire and comedy (and fail) as a substitute for having anything of substance to say.

Now that’s what I call a tantrum.

Stick to this genre, Longy. Essay writing can’t be everybody’s cup of tea.

Back to top

IP Logged

Aussie Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 38564 Gender:	Re: In support of Gay Incest. Reply #84 - Jul 20^th, 2015 at 6:56pm Quote: it is about defending a position you inherently disagree with. By creating fictitious sources? What a wan k!
Back to top	IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 74328
Gender: male

Re: In support of Gay Incest.
Reply #85 - Jul 20^th, 2015 at 7:03pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 20^th, 2015 at 5:32pm:

Phemanderac wrote on Jul 19^th, 2015 at 3:22pm:

Longy, you want a bit of cred? Let someone else fully set the challenge, word limit, rules and time limit.

Then see how you go if anyone else takes up the challenge. Anything else is just you "roping" people in, it lacks honesty, credibility and demonstration of genuine writing skills.

Anything other than that is just you saying you won.... Oh wait!

That is a fine idea, but lacks one thing - a decent reasonable intelligent and intellectually honest person to run the Challenge. Aussie 'decided' that e would stup in - uninvited and unwanted of course - and declare that mytopic was to disprove the existence of God for the sole reason that he knows it is a topic I would refuse.

Now, if you want to step up and do soemthing about it then you are free to do so. I figured that three semi-reasonable people could so it as an un-marked exercise but bam and peccahead declined (of course) while Karnal - who is still throwing a tantrum - joined in.

You are welcome to do something about it.

it's excuse after excuse after excuse .. Cheesy

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

Karnal Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 95430 Gender:	Re: In support of Gay Incest. Reply #86 - Jul 20^th, 2015 at 7:03pm Aussie wrote on Jul 20^th, 2015 at 6:56pm: Quote: it is about defending a position you inherently disagree with. By creating fictitious sources? What a wan k! Not only a w ank, but an automatic fail at any educational level. You up for the challenge?
Back to top	IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 38564
Gender: male

Re: In support of Gay Incest.
Reply #87 - Jul 20^th, 2015 at 7:38pm

Karnal wrote on Jul 20^th, 2015 at 7:03pm:

Aussie wrote on Jul 20^th, 2015 at 6:56pm:

Quote:

it is about defending a position you inherently disagree with.

By creating fictitious sources? What a wan k!

Not only a w ank, but an automatic fail at any educational level.

You up for the challenge?

Sure. I have no dog in the fight. I am not a writer's keyboard, but I'm quite happy to have a go, even if I fail in the eyes of some.

Back to top

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 95430
Gender: male

Re: In support of Gay Incest.
Reply #88 - Jul 20^th, 2015 at 7:40pm

Aussie wrote on Jul 20^th, 2015 at 7:38pm:

Karnal wrote on Jul 20^th, 2015 at 7:03pm:

Aussie wrote on Jul 20^th, 2015 at 6:56pm:

Quote:

it is about defending a position you inherently disagree with.

By creating fictitious sources? What a wan k!

Not only a w ank, but an automatic fail at any educational level.

You up for the challenge?

Sure. I have no dog in the fight. I am not a writer's keyboard, but I'm quite happy to have a go, even if I fail in the eyes of some.

What do you pick? I’m happy to do slavery or paedophilia.

Back to top

IP Logged

Aussie Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 38564 Gender:	Re: In support of Gay Incest. Reply #89 - Jul 20^th, 2015 at 7:45pm Melielingtime can pick mine, even if he will not agree that I may pick his.
Back to top	IP Logged