Australian Politics Forum - How is it 'racist' to protest against Islamic valu

double plus good Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 5693 Gender:	Re: How is it 'racist' to protest against Islamic valu Reply #135 - Jul 20^th, 2015 at 7:03pm Stratos wrote on Jul 20^th, 2015 at 7:02pm: aw cute, look at that, he thinks he evaded your question Oh looky here, the beheading sign defender is here.
Back to top	IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 35465
Gender: female

Re: How is it 'racist' to protest against Islamic valu
Reply #136 - Jul 20^th, 2015 at 7:05pm

double plus good wrote on Jul 20^th, 2015 at 7:01pm:

mothra wrote on Jul 20^th, 2015 at 6:56pm:

double plus good wrote on Jul 20^th, 2015 at 6:53pm:

mothra wrote on Jul 20^th, 2015 at 6:49pm:

double plus good wrote on Jul 20^th, 2015 at 6:48pm:

mothra wrote on Jul 20^th, 2015 at 6:46pm:

You are deflecting. Answer the question.

I've has enough of you mothra. I don't like what I read. I thought I was racist. God damned.

You are.

I am not.

You don't like white advancement in Australia for some reason. You don't like white kids getting better. That's racist as far as I'm concerned. It's hypocritical also because you want the same thing for aborigines.

I don't want "white" advancement Double. I don't want white people put before any other kind of people. White people already hold the majority of power. There is no need for advancement.

To twist that into saying i don't want the best for white kids is preposterous.

All this fus so you don't have to answer a question. Really?

I'm not in power. A small group of white people have power. Most white peopledon't have power over hardly anything in their lives. There's plenty of room for white people to advance in Australia. Many white kids are on drugs. When you say white do you mean white establishment?

Those are problems that effect all demographics Double. There is no need to colour code them.

Now ... about answering my question?

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

double plus good

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 5693
Gender: male

Re: How is it 'racist' to protest against Islamic valu
Reply #137 - Jul 20^th, 2015 at 7:06pm

mothra wrote on Jul 20^th, 2015 at 7:05pm:

double plus good wrote on Jul 20^th, 2015 at 7:01pm:

mothra wrote on Jul 20^th, 2015 at 6:56pm:

double plus good wrote on Jul 20^th, 2015 at 6:53pm:

mothra wrote on Jul 20^th, 2015 at 6:49pm:

double plus good wrote on Jul 20^th, 2015 at 6:48pm:

mothra wrote on Jul 20^th, 2015 at 6:46pm:

You are deflecting. Answer the question.

I've has enough of you mothra. I don't like what I read. I thought I was racist. God damned.

You are.

I am not.

You don't like white advancement in Australia for some reason. You don't like white kids getting better. That's racist as far as I'm concerned. It's hypocritical also because you want the same thing for aborigines.

I don't want "white" advancement Double. I don't want white people put before any other kind of people. White people already hold the majority of power. There is no need for advancement.

To twist that into saying i don't want the best for white kids is preposterous.

All this fus so you don't have to answer a question. Really?

I'm not in power. A small group of white people have power. Most white peopledon't have power over hardly anything in their lives. There's plenty of room for white people to advance in Australia. Many white kids are on drugs. When you say white do you mean white establishment?

Those are problems that effect all demographics Double. There is no need to colour code them.

Now ... about answering my question?

What was your question?

Back to top

IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 35465
Gender: female

Re: How is it 'racist' to protest against Islamic valu
Reply #138 - Jul 20^th, 2015 at 7:07pm

mothra wrote on Jul 20^th, 2015 at 6:36pm:

double plus good wrote on Jul 20^th, 2015 at 6:33pm:

mothra wrote on Jul 20^th, 2015 at 6:29pm:

double plus good wrote on Jul 20^th, 2015 at 6:24pm:

I'll settle this now for you mothra- The total number of Afghans to settle in Australia was approximately 3,000, with over 2,000 arriving between 1870 and 1900.[2]. 3,000 from the 1830's to 1900. It wasn't many. They did important work in the interior but it was minimal. Aborigines did small things like working on cattle stations and a small amount fought in the wars. Germans in early Australia did more than both of them. Ludwig Leichardt explored big parts of northern Australia for example. Most of the work was done by Perry's, Jones's and O'Briens. It's just the truth. You need to come to terms with the truth and show some respect for our history. This work was financed and spearheaded by the British Empire. It's just a fact.

The early settlers would have died if it weren't for Aboriginal assistance.

As for the rest, you're equally understating their impact.

But you continue to miss the point Double.

You are entitled to be proud of your British or Irish heritage. Nothing at all wrong with that.

What is wrong is pushing for white advancement. White people are not responsible for colonising this land ... groups of people from various parts of the world are. Do you follow now?

Loads of early settlement was done by white people without aboriginal assistance. Look at Sydney. I'm sorry if you don't like my race advancing. Do you like the idea of other races advancing in Australia?

So you are, even though i have pointed out where you err, talking bout white people still?

Even white groups that had no part in the settlement of Australia?

Just white is enough?

This question.

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

double plus good

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 5693
Gender: male

Re: How is it 'racist' to protest against Islamic valu
Reply #139 - Jul 20^th, 2015 at 7:09pm

mothra wrote on Jul 20^th, 2015 at 7:07pm:

mothra wrote on Jul 20^th, 2015 at 6:36pm:

double plus good wrote on Jul 20^th, 2015 at 6:33pm:

mothra wrote on Jul 20^th, 2015 at 6:29pm:

double plus good wrote on Jul 20^th, 2015 at 6:24pm:

I'll settle this now for you mothra- The total number of Afghans to settle in Australia was approximately 3,000, with over 2,000 arriving between 1870 and 1900.[2]. 3,000 from the 1830's to 1900. It wasn't many. They did important work in the interior but it was minimal. Aborigines did small things like working on cattle stations and a small amount fought in the wars. Germans in early Australia did more than both of them. Ludwig Leichardt explored big parts of northern Australia for example. Most of the work was done by Perry's, Jones's and O'Briens. It's just the truth. You need to come to terms with the truth and show some respect for our history. This work was financed and spearheaded by the British Empire. It's just a fact.

The early settlers would have died if it weren't for Aboriginal assistance.

As for the rest, you're equally understating their impact.

But you continue to miss the point Double.

You are entitled to be proud of your British or Irish heritage. Nothing at all wrong with that.

What is wrong is pushing for white advancement. White people are not responsible for colonising this land ... groups of people from various parts of the world are. Do you follow now?

Loads of early settlement was done by white people without aboriginal assistance. Look at Sydney. I'm sorry if you don't like my race advancing. Do you like the idea of other races advancing in Australia?

So you are, even though i have pointed out where you err, talking bout white people still?

Even white groups that had no part in the settlement of Australia?

Just white is enough?

This question.

I don't understand your question.

Back to top

IP Logged

Stratos

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 4725

Re: How is it 'racist' to protest against Islamic valu
Reply #140 - Jul 20^th, 2015 at 7:10pm

double plus good wrote on Jul 20^th, 2015 at 7:03pm:

Oh looky here, the beheading sign defender is here.

Nope, I pondered which was worse, a sign calling for beheading, or one that had a white supremacist slogan and "heil Hitler" on it.

You should work on your comprehension by the way:

Quote:

Not sure if that compares favourably to a call for beheading to be honest. Both extremely repulsive.

Back to top

Pete Waldo wrote on Jan 15^th, 2014 at 11:24pm:

Thus killing those Canaanite babies while they were still innocent, was a particularly merciful act

IP Logged

double plus good

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 5693
Gender: male

Re: How is it 'racist' to protest against Islamic valu
Reply #141 - Jul 20^th, 2015 at 7:11pm

Stratos wrote on Jul 20^th, 2015 at 7:10pm:

double plus good wrote on Jul 20^th, 2015 at 7:03pm:

Oh looky here, the beheading sign defender is here.

Nope, I pondered which was worse, a sign calling for beheading, or one that had a white supremacist slogan and "heil Hitler" on it.

You should work on your comprehension by the way:

Quote:

Not sure if that compares favourably to a call for beheading to be honest. Both extremely repulsive.

Are you going to argue or pick me up on my spelling? I know what's worse. Little kids holding up beheading signs.

Back to top

IP Logged

Stratos

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 4725

Re: How is it 'racist' to protest against Islamic valu
Reply #142 - Jul 20^th, 2015 at 7:13pm

double plus good wrote on Jul 20^th, 2015 at 7:11pm:

Are you going to argue or pick me up on my spelling?

Comprehension, not spelling good fellow.

Would mean you don't end up blatantly lying when you say things like:

double plus good wrote on Jul 20^th, 2015 at 7:03pm:

Oh looky here, the beheading sign defender is here.

Back to top

Pete Waldo wrote on Jan 15^th, 2014 at 11:24pm:

Thus killing those Canaanite babies while they were still innocent, was a particularly merciful act

IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 35465
Gender: female

Re: How is it 'racist' to protest against Islamic valu
Reply #143 - Jul 20^th, 2015 at 7:13pm

Double, you've been arguing that white people built this country and that the flag represents those that did. You want their advancement.

Yes?

My question to you is being white enough? What about Scandinavian people who had no part in building this country? In Eastern Europeans? Do you want their advancement too simply because they are white?

I keep telling you it's fine to be proud of being British or Irish or whatever group you claim heredity to that "built this country" but claiming pride in simply being white is another matter entirely.

Can you see the difference?

There. Now you have 2 questions.

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

double plus good

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 5693
Gender: male

Re: How is it 'racist' to protest against Islamic valu
Reply #144 - Jul 20^th, 2015 at 7:15pm

Stratos wrote on Jul 20^th, 2015 at 7:13pm:

double plus good wrote on Jul 20^th, 2015 at 7:11pm:

Are you going to argue or pick me up on my spelling?

Comprehension, not spelling good fellow.

Would mean you don't end up blatantly lying when you say things like:

double plus good wrote on Jul 20^th, 2015 at 7:03pm:

Oh looky here, the beheading sign defender is here.

Picking up comprehension is when you have lost. So you've pondered. What's the conclusion then??

Back to top

IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 35465
Gender: female

Re: How is it 'racist' to protest against Islamic valu
Reply #145 - Jul 20^th, 2015 at 7:16pm

double plus good wrote on Jul 20^th, 2015 at 7:11pm:

Stratos wrote on Jul 20^th, 2015 at 7:10pm:

double plus good wrote on Jul 20^th, 2015 at 7:03pm:

Oh looky here, the beheading sign defender is here.

Nope, I pondered which was worse, a sign calling for beheading, or one that had a white supremacist slogan and "heil Hitler" on it.

You should work on your comprehension by the way:

Quote:

Not sure if that compares favourably to a call for beheading to be honest. Both extremely repulsive.

Are you going to argue or pick me up on my spelling? I know what's worse. Little kids holding up beheading signs.

Holding up beheading signs is disgusting and especially so when done by children.

But so is white supremacy ESPECIALLY when it refers to Hitler.

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

double plus good

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 5693
Gender: male

Re: How is it 'racist' to protest against Islamic valu
Reply #146 - Jul 20^th, 2015 at 7:17pm

mothra wrote on Jul 20^th, 2015 at 7:13pm:

Double, you've been arguing that white people built this country and that the flag represents those that did. You want their advancement.

Yes?

My question to you is being white enough? What about Scandinavian people who had no part in building this country? In Eastern Europeans? Do you want their advancement too simply because they are white?

I keep telling you it's fine to be proud of being British or Irish or whatever group you claim heredity to that "built this country" but claiming pride in simply being white is another matter entirely.

Can you see the difference?

There. Now you have 2 questions.

But British people are white. African's are African but can still be black.

Back to top

IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 35465
Gender: female

Re: How is it 'racist' to protest against Islamic valu
Reply #147 - Jul 20^th, 2015 at 7:18pm

double plus good wrote on Jul 20^th, 2015 at 7:17pm:

mothra wrote on Jul 20^th, 2015 at 7:13pm:

Double, you've been arguing that white people built this country and that the flag represents those that did. You want their advancement.

Yes?

My question to you is being white enough? What about Scandinavian people who had no part in building this country? In Eastern Europeans? Do you want their advancement too simply because they are white?

I keep telling you it's fine to be proud of being British or Irish or whatever group you claim heredity to that "built this country" but claiming pride in simply being white is another matter entirely.

Can you see the difference?

There. Now you have 2 questions.

But British people are white. African's are African but can still be black.

Are you deliberately missing the point entirely?

Read it again Double.

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

double plus good

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 5693
Gender: male

Re: How is it 'racist' to protest against Islamic valu
Reply #148 - Jul 20^th, 2015 at 7:19pm

mothra wrote on Jul 20^th, 2015 at 7:16pm:

double plus good wrote on Jul 20^th, 2015 at 7:11pm:

Stratos wrote on Jul 20^th, 2015 at 7:10pm:

double plus good wrote on Jul 20^th, 2015 at 7:03pm:

Oh looky here, the beheading sign defender is here.

Nope, I pondered which was worse, a sign calling for beheading, or one that had a white supremacist slogan and "heil Hitler" on it.

You should work on your comprehension by the way:

Quote:

Not sure if that compares favourably to a call for beheading to be honest. Both extremely repulsive.

Are you going to argue or pick me up on my spelling? I know what's worse. Little kids holding up beheading signs.

Holding up beheading signs is disgusting and especially so when done by children.

But so is white supremacy ESPECIALLY when it refers to Hitler.

Nobody even knew what the 1488 sign meant. Actually I have no proof it was even at the march. I haven't seen it in the media. Some proof would be good. We've seen the beheading signs.

Back to top

IP Logged

double plus good

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 5693
Gender: male

Re: How is it 'racist' to protest against Islamic valu
Reply #149 - Jul 20^th, 2015 at 7:23pm

mothra wrote on Jul 20^th, 2015 at 7:18pm:

double plus good wrote on Jul 20^th, 2015 at 7:17pm:

mothra wrote on Jul 20^th, 2015 at 7:13pm:

Double, you've been arguing that white people built this country and that the flag represents those that did. You want their advancement.

Yes?

My question to you is being white enough? What about Scandinavian people who had no part in building this country? In Eastern Europeans? Do you want their advancement too simply because they are white?

I keep telling you it's fine to be proud of being British or Irish or whatever group you claim heredity to that "built this country" but claiming pride in simply being white is another matter entirely.

Can you see the difference?

There. Now you have 2 questions.

But British people are white. African's are African but can still be black.

Are you deliberately missing the point entirely?

Read it again Double.

When I mean white Australian I mean anglo/celtic people who have been here for generations. I'm not referring to blow ins of all skin colours. I want that heritage to prosper in Australia.

Back to top

IP Logged