Australian Politics Forum - The Myth of the 97% consensus claim

ImSpartacus2 Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 6913	Re: The Myth of the 97% consensus claim Reply #525 - Sep 12^th, 2015 at 10:31am lee wrote on Sep 12^th, 2015 at 10:26am: Double posting your crap doesn't make it any more interesting, or relevant. It's a lot more credible then the cr@p you post. Are you going to answer the question or still hide???
Back to top	IP Logged

Ajax

Gold Member

Offline

CO2 has never controlled
temperature on Earth

Posts: 10975
Australia
Gender: male

Re: The Myth of the 97% consensus claim
Reply #526 - Sep 12^th, 2015 at 10:39am

ImSpartacus2 wrote on Sep 12^th, 2015 at 9:52am:

Ajax wrote on Sep 11^th, 2015 at 11:42pm:

The Arctic melting and reforming has been going on for a very long time.

September 1957 - arctic decreases by 40%

http://i41.tinypic.com/2w6yrlg.jpg

May 1947 - arctic melting

http://trove.nla.gov.au/ndp/del/article/22429983?searchTerm=climate%20change&sea...

November 1922 - arctic melting

http://docs.lib.noaa.gov/rescue/mwr/050/mwr-050-11-0589a.pdf

I'm interested Ajax, did you trawl through the archives of the Argus etc and just happened to stumble onto these articles or did you get them from some other site. Could you give us the link of the other site you got this from.

You're so thick I'm not even going to try.

Other intelligent folks can work out..!!

Back to top

1. There has never been a more serious assault on our standard of living than Anthropogenic Global Warming..Ajax
2. "One hour of freedom is worth more than 40 years of slavery & prison" Regas Feraeos

IP Logged

ImSpartacus2 Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 6913	Re: The Myth of the 97% consensus claim Reply #527 - Sep 12^th, 2015 at 10:44am .....
Back to top	IP Logged

ImSpartacus2

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 6913

Re: The Myth of the 97% consensus claim
Reply #528 - Sep 12^th, 2015 at 10:46am

Ajax wrote on Sep 12^th, 2015 at 10:39am:

ImSpartacus2 wrote on Sep 12^th, 2015 at 9:52am:

Ajax wrote on Sep 11^th, 2015 at 11:42pm:

The Arctic melting and reforming has been going on for a very long time.

September 1957 - arctic decreases by 40%

http://i41.tinypic.com/2w6yrlg.jpg

May 1947 - arctic melting

http://trove.nla.gov.au/ndp/del/article/22429983?searchTerm=climate%20change&sea...

November 1922 - arctic melting

http://docs.lib.noaa.gov/rescue/mwr/050/mwr-050-11-0589a.pdf

I'm interested Ajax, did you trawl through the archives of the Argus etc and just happened to stumble onto these articles or did you get them from some other site. Could you give us the link of the other site you got this from.

You're so thick I'm not even going to try.

Other intelligent folks can work out..!!

So there you have it!!! Both the Ajax and Lee socks are refusing to disclose who sends then here to disseminate their BS!!!! Says everything about these 2 poor excuses for human beings.

Back to top

IP Logged

ImSpartacus2

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 6913

Re: The Myth of the 97% consensus claim
Reply #529 - Sep 12^th, 2015 at 10:47am

Ajax wrote on Sep 12^th, 2015 at 10:39am:

ImSpartacus2 wrote on Sep 12^th, 2015 at 9:52am:

Ajax wrote on Sep 11^th, 2015 at 11:42pm:

The Arctic melting and reforming has been going on for a very long time.

September 1957 - arctic decreases by 40%

http://i41.tinypic.com/2w6yrlg.jpg

May 1947 - arctic melting

http://trove.nla.gov.au/ndp/del/article/22429983?searchTerm=climate%20change&sea...

November 1922 - arctic melting

http://docs.lib.noaa.gov/rescue/mwr/050/mwr-050-11-0589a.pdf

I'm interested Ajax, did you trawl through the archives of the Argus etc and just happened to stumble onto these articles or did you get them from some other site. Could you give us the link of the other site you got this from.

You're so thick I'm not even going to try.

Other intelligent folks can work out..!!

So there you have it!!! Both the Ajax and Lee socks are refusing to disclose who sends then here to disseminate their BS!!!! Says everything about these 2 poor excuses for human beings.

Back to top

IP Logged

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 17305 Gender:	Re: The Myth of the 97% consensus claim Reply #530 - Sep 12^th, 2015 at 10:49am Warning. Don't feed the trolls.
Back to top	IP Logged

mariacostel

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 7344
Sydney
Gender: female

Re: The Myth of the 97% consensus claim
Reply #531 - Sep 12^th, 2015 at 4:18pm

lee wrote on Sep 12^th, 2015 at 10:20am:

Ah the conspiracy theorist in full flight.

It is something to behold. EVERY site is a denialist conspiracy site unless it supports his belief and agenda.

He must be fuming that the IPCC has dropped the hockey stick as bad science then. Who now will he quote? When Mann was countersued for defamation, 19 groups - mainly environmental grouos - supported his OPPONENT while precisely no one supported Mann.

Back to top

IP Logged

mariacostel

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 7344
Sydney
Gender: female

Re: The Myth of the 97% consensus claim
Reply #532 - Sep 12^th, 2015 at 4:19pm

ImSpartacus2 wrote on Sep 12^th, 2015 at 10:29am:

lee wrote on Sep 12^th, 2015 at 10:20am:

Ah the conspiracy theorist in full flight.

So the science community says their best science reveals AGW. You and Ajax say its a hoax invented by the banks (to what end is anybody's guess) and then accuse the scientists of conspiracy theory. What a liar you are

Actually the community says it has no idea. And that is peer-reviewed unlike the hysterical garbage sites you post from.

Back to top

IP Logged

mariacostel Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 7344 Sydney Gender:	Re: The Myth of the 97% consensus claim Reply #533 - Sep 12^th, 2015 at 4:20pm lee wrote on Sep 12^th, 2015 at 10:49am: Warning. Don't feed the trolls. Spartacus is quite the troll, that is for sure. Never quotes science and only sprouts ideology.
Back to top	IP Logged

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 17305 Gender:	Re: The Myth of the 97% consensus claim Reply #534 - Sep 12^th, 2015 at 4:28pm The most amusing feature- You quote IPCC, NASA/NOOA and he wants to know what denialist site you got it from, not that the sites you quote is the truth as they see it. Somehow being reported on a sceptic site, somehow invalidates what IPCC, NASA/NOOA etc say.
Back to top	IP Logged

ImSpartacus2 Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 6913	Re: The Myth of the 97% consensus claim Reply #535 - Sep 12^th, 2015 at 5:23pm lee wrote on Sep 12^th, 2015 at 10:49am: Warning. Don't feed the trolls. You have absolutely no basis for refusing to identify your sources and the research, if any, you have done to satisfies you of their bona fides unless your hiding something. It's really that simple.
Back to top	IP Logged

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 17305 Gender:	Re: The Myth of the 97% consensus claim Reply #536 - Sep 12^th, 2015 at 6:05pm I've been quite open about my sources. Live with it.
Back to top	IP Logged

mariacostel

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 7344
Sydney
Gender: female

Re: The Myth of the 97% consensus claim
Reply #537 - Sep 12^th, 2015 at 6:16pm

lee wrote on Sep 12^th, 2015 at 6:05pm:

I've been quite open about my sources. Live with it.

As have I. But Lee, you are right about him rejecting even direct quotes from NASA, MET etc if they are inconvenient. He still beleives that there has been no hiatus is warming despite showing him a Nature Magazine link to that effect.

it is amusing being called a denialist when actually it is people like him that are clearly deniers of any information not to his liking.

Back to top

IP Logged

ImSpartacus2 Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 6913	Re: The Myth of the 97% consensus claim Reply #538 - Sep 12^th, 2015 at 7:40pm ......
Back to top	« Last Edit: Sep 12^th, 2015 at 7:50pm by ImSpartacus2 » IP Logged

ImSpartacus2

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 6913

Re: The Myth of the 97% consensus claim
Reply #539 - Sep 12^th, 2015 at 7:40pm

lee wrote on Sep 12^th, 2015 at 6:05pm:

I've been quite open about my sources. Live with it.

That's not true. Answer the questions I've asked instead of being evasive. There is only one explanation for your evasiveness and that's that you're a lying sock. Here, I'll give you yet another chance and make it easy for you by quoting below the question I asked you days ago and repeatedly asked you since and you have repeatedly refused to answer. Answer the question!

ImSpartacus2 wrote on Sep 9^th, 2015 at 12:59pm:

What research have you done regarding the allegations that the denialist sites you take your arguments from and do your cutting and pasting from are not compromised by their receipt of funding from the fossil fuel industry. Any person who is not a sock and who is genuinely interested in the science instead of the idiological implications of AGW would comprehensively research that matter and share their research and conclusions with us. Are you going to answer the question. Yes or no sock???

Back to top

IP Logged