Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 
Send Topic Print
Should speakers sever party ties? (Read 2365 times)
Dnarever
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 59393
Here
Gender: male
Re: Should speakers sever party ties?
Reply #30 - Jul 22nd, 2015 at 6:11pm
 
longweekend58 wrote on Jul 22nd, 2015 at 3:29pm:
John Smith wrote on Jul 22nd, 2015 at 3:04pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Jul 22nd, 2015 at 3:03pm:
Bam wrote on Jul 22nd, 2015 at 2:51pm:
The first Speaker of the Federal Parliament did sever party ties. Slipper is one of the few Speakers who've come anywhere near that principle. B.Bishop, on the other hand, is such a poor custodian of impartiality that she has even used her Speaker's office for Liberal party functions.

IMO it would be a good idea for the Speaker to become an independent by renouncing any party affiliation.


Slipper had his part ties severed FOR him.  Please dont imbue him with a set of ethics an honesty he clearly does not nor ever did, possess.


The really sad part is that Slipper has shown more ethics than the current speaker


yeah really?  slipper has 20 offences to his name.  But there is only one motivation for any position you hold on any topic: anti-liberal.  Perhaps you could try involving facts, perspective and truth into your thinking.

or not.


The really sad part is that Slipper has shown more ethics than the current speaker


Correct.

slipper has 20 offences to his name

That does not make the stated fact that you comment on any better.

Fact is that Slipper was one of our better speakers and the incumbent speaker is in a small group at the other end of the scale if not all by herself.

Bishops performance has been an embarrassment to the Australian government.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 38868
Gender: male
Re: Should speakers sever party ties?
Reply #31 - Jul 22nd, 2015 at 6:17pm
 
longweekend58 wrote on Jul 22nd, 2015 at 6:07pm:
Aussie wrote on Jul 22nd, 2015 at 6:04pm:
Quote:
Hansard stats show that ALL speakers favour the government of the day


That is true, but Bishop is a stand out ~ unique.  Have you signed the Petition which presses for her resignation/removal?  I'll re-post the link if you haven't.


the point of the hansard stats was to demonstrate that she ISNT a standout at all. Her removal for travel rorts is a different issue. (I know. 2 separate issues must be hard for you to follow)


The Courier Mail (paywall so no link) ran an article on her which sets out the comparative stats. 
So...let's see your link to what you reckon Hansard says.
  I have no idea why you would regard it as difficult, even for someone like yourself, to grasp that travel rorts are not the equivalent of her performance in the House as Speaker, but they are directly linked.  Tony Burke must be relishing the next Question Time.  They will, quite rightly, relentlessly mock the crap out of her.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: Should speakers sever party ties?
Reply #32 - Jul 22nd, 2015 at 6:21pm
 
Dnarever wrote on Jul 22nd, 2015 at 6:11pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Jul 22nd, 2015 at 3:29pm:
John Smith wrote on Jul 22nd, 2015 at 3:04pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Jul 22nd, 2015 at 3:03pm:
Bam wrote on Jul 22nd, 2015 at 2:51pm:
The first Speaker of the Federal Parliament did sever party ties. Slipper is one of the few Speakers who've come anywhere near that principle. B.Bishop, on the other hand, is such a poor custodian of impartiality that she has even used her Speaker's office for Liberal party functions.

IMO it would be a good idea for the Speaker to become an independent by renouncing any party affiliation.


Slipper had his part ties severed FOR him.  Please dont imbue him with a set of ethics an honesty he clearly does not nor ever did, possess.


The really sad part is that Slipper has shown more ethics than the current speaker


yeah really?  slipper has 20 offences to his name.  But there is only one motivation for any position you hold on any topic: anti-liberal.  Perhaps you could try involving facts, perspective and truth into your thinking.

or not.


The really sad part is that Slipper has shown more ethics than the current speaker


Correct.

slipper has 20 offences to his name

That does not make the stated fact that you comment on any better.

Fact is that Slipper was one of our better speakers and the incumbent speaker is in a small group at the other end of the scale if not all by herself.

Bishops performance has been an embarrassment to the Australian government.



the ONLY thing you liked about Slipper is that he kept Gillard in power a bit like how you defended Thompson for years.  ethics are not your strong suit.
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
Its time
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Boot libs out

Posts: 25639
Gender: female
Re: Should speakers sever party ties?
Reply #33 - Jul 22nd, 2015 at 6:28pm
 
I dont ever remember slipper ever ruling a question out of order, before it was even asked.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: Should speakers sever party ties?
Reply #34 - Jul 22nd, 2015 at 6:36pm
 
Its time wrote on Jul 22nd, 2015 at 6:28pm:
I dont ever remember slipper ever ruling a question out of order, before it was even asked.


I doubt you recall much at all. Likemost lefties, your memory is similar to that of a goldfish, but conveniently so.
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
Its time
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Boot libs out

Posts: 25639
Gender: female
Re: Should speakers sever party ties?
Reply #35 - Jul 22nd, 2015 at 6:39pm
 
longweekend58 wrote on Jul 22nd, 2015 at 6:36pm:
Its time wrote on Jul 22nd, 2015 at 6:28pm:
I dont ever remember slipper ever ruling a question out of order, before it was even asked.


I doubt you recall much at all. Likemost lefties, your memory is similar to that of a goldfish, but conveniently so.


Perhaps you can refresh our memories with an example longy.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 38868
Gender: male
Re: Should speakers sever party ties?
Reply #36 - Jul 22nd, 2015 at 6:48pm
 
Its time wrote on Jul 22nd, 2015 at 6:39pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Jul 22nd, 2015 at 6:36pm:
Its time wrote on Jul 22nd, 2015 at 6:28pm:
I dont ever remember slipper ever ruling a question out of order, before it was even asked.


I doubt you recall much at all. Likemost lefties, your memory is similar to that of a goldfish, but conveniently so.


Perhaps you can refresh our memories with an example longy.



....AND give us the link which supports this.

Quote:
Hansard stats show that ALL speakers favour the government of the day.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: Should speakers sever party ties?
Reply #37 - Jul 22nd, 2015 at 6:52pm
 
Aussie wrote on Jul 22nd, 2015 at 6:48pm:
Its time wrote on Jul 22nd, 2015 at 6:39pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Jul 22nd, 2015 at 6:36pm:
Its time wrote on Jul 22nd, 2015 at 6:28pm:
I dont ever remember slipper ever ruling a question out of order, before it was even asked.


I doubt you recall much at all. Likemost lefties, your memory is similar to that of a goldfish, but conveniently so.


Perhaps you can refresh our memories with an example longy.



....AND give us the link which supports this.

Quote:
Hansard stats show that ALL speakers favour the government of the day.



you provided t hat link yourself a few minutes ago fool.  goldfish memory got you again?
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 38868
Gender: male
Re: Should speakers sever party ties?
Reply #38 - Jul 22nd, 2015 at 6:53pm
 
longweekend58 wrote on Jul 22nd, 2015 at 6:52pm:
Aussie wrote on Jul 22nd, 2015 at 6:48pm:
Its time wrote on Jul 22nd, 2015 at 6:39pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Jul 22nd, 2015 at 6:36pm:
Its time wrote on Jul 22nd, 2015 at 6:28pm:
I dont ever remember slipper ever ruling a question out of order, before it was even asked.


I doubt you recall much at all. Likemost lefties, your memory is similar to that of a goldfish, but conveniently so.


Perhaps you can refresh our memories with an example longy.



....AND give us the link which supports this.

Quote:
Hansard stats show that ALL speakers favour the government of the day.



you provided t hat link yourself a few minutes ago fool.  goldfish memory got you again?


What post number are you referring to?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
sir prince duke alevine
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male
Re: Should speakers sever party ties?
Reply #39 - Jul 22nd, 2015 at 7:15pm
 
longweekend58 wrote on Jul 22nd, 2015 at 5:50pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jul 22nd, 2015 at 5:46pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Jul 22nd, 2015 at 5:41pm:
Aussie wrote on Jul 22nd, 2015 at 5:21pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Jul 22nd, 2015 at 5:18pm:
Bam wrote on Jul 22nd, 2015 at 4:41pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Jul 22nd, 2015 at 3:03pm:
Bam wrote on Jul 22nd, 2015 at 2:51pm:
The first Speaker of the Federal Parliament did sever party ties. Slipper is one of the few Speakers who've come anywhere near that principle. B.Bishop, on the other hand, is such a poor custodian of impartiality that she has even used her Speaker's office for Liberal party functions.

IMO it would be a good idea for the Speaker to become an independent by renouncing any party affiliation.


Slipper had his part ties severed FOR him.  Please dont imbue him with a set of ethics an honesty he clearly does not nor ever did, possess.

Slipper was an independent when he was Speaker. How he got there is irrelevant.

As opposed to Biased Bronny, who isn't even pretending to be impartial while abusing her position as Speaker to raise funds for the Liberal party.


it's extremely relevant. He became an independent after resigning from a party that was in the process of throwing him out for his behaviour. That is not an irrelevency.


Do you support Bishop continuing to occupy the Speaker's Chair, melielongtime?

Was Slipper a 'better' Speaker than Bishop is?


I expect she will resign in a month or two and I suspect the decision has already been made. Yes, she should go. Slipper was a disgrace and the only single thing you like about him was that his defection permitted the Gillard govt to stay in power. You are as trasnparent as you are ethics-free, fake lawyer.

Putting his $900 indiscretion aside he was actually quite a good speaker, who didn't have a record of 99.9% of people
Kicked out being from the opposition.


as has been amply demonstrated in the recent past where your goldfish memory doesnt allow you to go, Hansard stats show that ALL speakers favour the government of the day and Bishop's performance is not at significant variance from anyone else.  I am equally sure you will absolutely refuse to accept that and demand a link which you will then deny in a months time when the topci inevitably arises again.

GET A MEMORY.


Partisan hack, all I said was that slipper was an impartial speaker.  Stupid partisan hack Grin
Back to top
 

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 75287
Gender: male
Re: Should speakers sever party ties?
Reply #40 - Jul 22nd, 2015 at 7:54pm
 
longweekend58 wrote on Jul 22nd, 2015 at 5:41pm:
Aussie wrote on Jul 22nd, 2015 at 5:21pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Jul 22nd, 2015 at 5:18pm:
Bam wrote on Jul 22nd, 2015 at 4:41pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Jul 22nd, 2015 at 3:03pm:
Bam wrote on Jul 22nd, 2015 at 2:51pm:
The first Speaker of the Federal Parliament did sever party ties. Slipper is one of the few Speakers who've come anywhere near that principle. B.Bishop, on the other hand, is such a poor custodian of impartiality that she has even used her Speaker's office for Liberal party functions.

IMO it would be a good idea for the Speaker to become an independent by renouncing any party affiliation.


Slipper had his part ties severed FOR him.  Please dont imbue him with a set of ethics an honesty he clearly does not nor ever did, possess.

Slipper was an independent when he was Speaker. How he got there is irrelevant.

As opposed to Biased Bronny, who isn't even pretending to be impartial while abusing her position as Speaker to raise funds for the Liberal party.


it's extremely relevant. He became an independent after resigning from a party that was in the process of throwing him out for his behaviour. That is not an irrelevency.


Do you support Bishop continuing to occupy the Speaker's Chair, melielongtime?

Was Slipper a 'better' Speaker than Bishop is?


I expect she will resign in a month or two and I suspect the decision has already been made. Yes, she should go. Slipper was a disgrace and the only single thing you like about him was that his defection permitted the Gillard govt to stay in power. You are as trasnparent as you are ethics-free, fake lawyer.


no one asked for your expectations ... do you support Bishop? It's really not a difficult question is it? even for you.
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 75287
Gender: male
Re: Should speakers sever party ties?
Reply #41 - Jul 22nd, 2015 at 7:56pm
 
longweekend58 wrote on Jul 22nd, 2015 at 5:50pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jul 22nd, 2015 at 5:46pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Jul 22nd, 2015 at 5:41pm:
Aussie wrote on Jul 22nd, 2015 at 5:21pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Jul 22nd, 2015 at 5:18pm:
Bam wrote on Jul 22nd, 2015 at 4:41pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Jul 22nd, 2015 at 3:03pm:
Bam wrote on Jul 22nd, 2015 at 2:51pm:
The first Speaker of the Federal Parliament did sever party ties. Slipper is one of the few Speakers who've come anywhere near that principle. B.Bishop, on the other hand, is such a poor custodian of impartiality that she has even used her Speaker's office for Liberal party functions.

IMO it would be a good idea for the Speaker to become an independent by renouncing any party affiliation.


Slipper had his part ties severed FOR him.  Please dont imbue him with a set of ethics an honesty he clearly does not nor ever did, possess.

Slipper was an independent when he was Speaker. How he got there is irrelevant.

As opposed to Biased Bronny, who isn't even pretending to be impartial while abusing her position as Speaker to raise funds for the Liberal party.


it's extremely relevant. He became an independent after resigning from a party that was in the process of throwing him out for his behaviour. That is not an irrelevency.


Do you support Bishop continuing to occupy the Speaker's Chair, melielongtime?

Was Slipper a 'better' Speaker than Bishop is?


I expect she will resign in a month or two and I suspect the decision has already been made. Yes, she should go. Slipper was a disgrace and the only single thing you like about him was that his defection permitted the Gillard govt to stay in power. You are as trasnparent as you are ethics-free, fake lawyer.

Putting his $900 indiscretion aside he was actually quite a good speaker, who didn't have a record of 99.9% of people
Kicked out being from the opposition.


as has been amply demonstrated in the recent past where your goldfish memory doesnt allow you to go, Hansard stats show that ALL speakers favour the government of the day and Bishop's performance is not at significant variance from anyone else.  I am equally sure you will absolutely refuse to accept that and demand a link which you will then deny in a months time when the topci inevitably arises again.

GET A MEMORY.


why don't you refresh everyones memory and put up this 'record' you allude to?
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
Lisa Jones
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 39047
Sydney
Gender: female
Re: Should speakers sever party ties?
Reply #42 - Jul 22nd, 2015 at 7:58pm
 
I'm pretty sure Longy isn't going to support a 72 yr old grandma who should have and could have retired 7 yrs ago.
Back to top
 

If I let myself be bought then I am no longer free.

HYPATIA - Greek philosopher, mathematician and astronomer (370 - 415)
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 75287
Gender: male
Re: Should speakers sever party ties?
Reply #43 - Jul 22nd, 2015 at 8:01pm
 
Lisa Jones wrote on Jul 22nd, 2015 at 7:58pm:
I'm pretty sure Longy isn't going to support a 72 yr old grandma who should have and could have retired 7 yrs ago.


I'm pretty sure you are wrong ... he's been asked the question a dozen times in the past week and has refused to give a direct answer.

You're a rightie Lisa, do you support Bishop as speaker?
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
Swagman
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Beware of cheap imitations......

Posts: 15095
Illawarra NSW
Gender: male
Re: Should speakers sever party ties?
Reply #44 - Jul 22nd, 2015 at 8:07pm
 
John Smith wrote on Jul 22nd, 2015 at 8:01pm:
do you support Bishop as speaker?


Julie?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 
Send Topic Print