Australian Politics Forum - The most retarded circular argument

LifeOrDeath Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 1548	Re: The most retarded circular argument Reply #135 - Aug 7^th, 2015 at 12:58pm Quote: Just to reiterate WhyWhy, Karnal wants us to think Pho and Him are not the same ID and they just turn up and post together all the time and slip up every now and then. I use the term "thinks" to crack a joke because clearly it doesn't. Thanks Whywhy I'll take that on board.
Back to top	There is no evidence of the existence of a muslim,mohammed,or quran until 60 years after mohammed was supposed to have died. Posting on islam just encourages them and is a waste of time. IP Logged

Pho Huc

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 985
Victoria
Gender: male

Re: The most retarded circular argument
Reply #136 - Aug 7^th, 2015 at 1:02pm

Karnal, care to wade in on this? Is this something that Why does often?

I feel like its somehow our responsabilty to prove that we are different people, but also know that Why is pretty much logic proof, and watching her playing in paranoia land is kinda entertaining.

I guess its just a bit unnerving talking with a true head case.

Back to top

The law locks up the man who steals the goose from the common, but leaves the greater criminal loose who steals the common from the goose (convict saying)

IP Logged

LifeOrDeath Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 1548	Re: The most retarded circular argument Reply #137 - Aug 7^th, 2015 at 1:04pm I always enjoy people chatting with themselves shyte this will convince everyone.
Back to top	There is no evidence of the existence of a muslim,mohammed,or quran until 60 years after mohammed was supposed to have died. Posting on islam just encourages them and is a waste of time. IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 96570

Re: The most retarded circular argument
Reply #138 - Aug 7^th, 2015 at 1:24pm

Pho Huc wrote on Aug 7^th, 2015 at 1:02pm:

Karnal, care to wade in on this? Is this something that Why does often?

I feel like its somehow our responsabilty to prove that we are different people, but also know that Why is pretty much logic proof, and watching her playing in paranoia land is kinda entertaining.

I guess its just a bit unnerving talking with a true head case.

Whywhy's pretending to be snippy for being called Matty, his old ID (Mattywisk). It's a bit tricky for Whywhy because he keeps getting banned for posting things that crash the board. I don't think he's meant to be here at all.

He's not a "true" headcase. I believe it's drug-induced, although there is definitely a mental health component, possibly bi-polar. His current issues are largely behavioural. If he keeps taking his meds and not going on any amphetamine benders, he should be fine.

Back to top

IP Logged

LifeOrDeath

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 1548

Re: The most retarded circular argument
Reply #139 - Aug 7^th, 2015 at 1:29pm

Karnal wrote on Aug 7^th, 2015 at 1:24pm:

Pho Huc wrote on Aug 7^th, 2015 at 1:02pm:

Karnal, care to wade in on this? Is this something that Why does often?

I feel like its somehow our responsabilty to prove that we are different people, but also know that Why is pretty much logic proof, and watching her playing in paranoia land is kinda entertaining.

I guess its just a bit unnerving talking with a true head case.

Whywhy's pretending to be snippy for being called Matty, his old ID (Mattywisk). It's a bit tricky for Whywhy because he keeps getting banned for posting things that crash the board. I don't think he's meant to be here at all.

He's not a "true" headcase. I believe it's drug-induced, although there is definitely a mental health component, possibly bi-polar. His current issues are largely behavioural. If he keeps taking his meds and not going on any amphetamine benders, he should be fine.

Awe poor diddums is a widdle upset.

Well done that took you long enough Pho, Golf Clap.

Back to top

There is no evidence of the existence of a muslim,mohammed,or quran until 60 years after mohammed was supposed to have died. Grin

Posting on islam just encourages them and is a waste of time.

IP Logged

Prime Minister for Canyons Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 26906 Canberra Gender:	Re: The most retarded circular argument Reply #140 - Aug 7^th, 2015 at 1:45pm Matty seems gender confused too
Back to top	In a time of universal deceit — telling the truth is a revolutionary act. No evidence whatsoever it can be attributed to George Orwell or Eric Arthur Blair (in fact the same guy) IP Logged

Lisa Jones Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 39047 Sydney Gender:	Re: The most retarded circular argument Reply #141 - Aug 7^th, 2015 at 1:49pm Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Aug 7^th, 2015 at 1:45pm: Matty seems gender confused too Matty/Medulla aka thousands of banned OzPol nics....is TOTALLY INSANE. Hence why he chats to himself and/or chats utter nonsense. Just laugh and post over his online static.
Back to top	If I let myself be bought then I am no longer free. HYPATIA - Greek philosopher, mathematician and astronomer (370 - 415) IP Logged

Lisa Jones

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 39047
Sydney
Gender: female

Re: The most retarded circular argument
Reply #142 - Aug 7^th, 2015 at 1:51pm

Pho Huc wrote on Aug 7^th, 2015 at 1:02pm:

Karnal, care to wade in on this? Is this something that Why does often?

I feel like its somehow our responsabilty to prove that we are different people, but also know that Why is pretty much logic proof, and watching her playing in paranoia land is kinda entertaining.

I guess its just a bit unnerving talking with a true head case.

It's taken you THIS long to figure that out?

Back to top

If I let myself be bought then I am no longer free.

HYPATIA - Greek philosopher, mathematician and astronomer (370 - 415)

IP Logged

freediver

Gold Member

Offline

www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49426
At my desk.

Re: The most retarded circular argument
Reply #143 - Aug 7^th, 2015 at 1:55pm

Quote:

Why? Because any attempts to point out that most muslims have a different take on those words and deeeds to you will be dismissed and you will just come back to the same argument as you started with... over and over again- eg:

You think it was good. I think it was bad. I think your efforts to justify it reveals the evil of Islam. That is not a circular argument Gandalf.

Quote:

Debating religion from a rational point of view is by definition circular - its nothing unique to Islam. Ask any religious person why they "know" the tenets of their religion are true, and it will only ever come down to "because I believe it to be so". Its a matter of faith, not rationality.

That's why it only gets second prize in the most retarded competition Gandalf.

Quote:

I admit you perked my interest with this point S - because it got me thinking what does it actually mean by "nuffin to do wiv [insert religion/ideology]". To me its an extremely loaded term to use, and I'll point out I don't believe I've ever used it myself (as in "ISIS has nothing to do with Islam"). Or if I have, I'll probably take it back because its rather silly when you think about it. Of course it has something to do with Islam - and of course the crusades had something to do with Christianity, by simple virtue of the fact that in both instances the respective religions were invoked as justification.

It looks like the corollary of your "actions of the majority of Muslims" argument.

Quote:

But all thats rather meaningless. It misses the point I was talking about - and that is what Islam represents,

You have been arguing about what represents Islam - eg the actions of the majority of Muslims.

Quote:

It is simply an illogical argument to say that Islam is inherently violent because of how a minority behaves - while ignoring how the majority behave

It is inherently violent because Muhammed was a violent man and it forces even people like you to excuse and justify that violence.

Quote:

A majority of Germans voted for the nazis or the centrist parties that were in coalition with them. The nazis weren't exactly rejected by a "vast majority" of Germans were they?

The majority of Germans did not gas the Jews. The majority of Germans did not vote for gassing Jews. Does that mean gassing Jews has nothing to do with Nazism?

Quote:

As you say, G, Religion is the domestic justification. Expansive wars are power grabs. They are always justified by religious or ideological mumbo-jumbo. Christianity, Empire, Civilization, Freeeeedom.

You left out Caliphate Karnal. Was Islam the domestic justification for the Caliphate, or was the Caliphate the justification for Islam?

Back to top

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.

IP Logged

LifeOrDeath

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 1548

Re: The most retarded circular argument
Reply #144 - Aug 7^th, 2015 at 1:56pm

Lisa Jones wrote on Aug 7^th, 2015 at 1:51pm:

Pho Huc wrote on Aug 7^th, 2015 at 1:02pm:

Karnal, care to wade in on this? Is this something that Why does often?

I feel like its somehow our responsabilty to prove that we are different people, but also know that Why is pretty much logic proof, and watching her playing in paranoia land is kinda entertaining.

I guess its just a bit unnerving talking with a true head case.

It's taken you THIS long to figure that out?

Karnal has way more brains than to crawl into bed with the likes of you setty with your medulla obsession.

I love the way medulla used to make an utter fool out of you on yahoo and you would come crashing down every time. Grin

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1429877606/315#315

Back to top

There is no evidence of the existence of a muslim,mohammed,or quran until 60 years after mohammed was supposed to have died. Grin

Posting on islam just encourages them and is a waste of time.

IP Logged

Lisa Jones

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 39047
Sydney
Gender: female

Re: The most retarded circular argument
Reply #145 - Aug 7^th, 2015 at 2:01pm

LifeOrDeath wrote on Aug 7^th, 2015 at 12:58pm:

Quote:

Just to reiterate WhyWhy, Karnal wants us to think Pho and Him are not the same ID and they just turn up and post together all the time and slip up every now and then.

I use the term "thinks" to crack a joke because clearly it doesn't.

Thanks Whywhy I'll take that on board. Grin

Whywhy multi banned troll talking to itself.

Lithium issues????

Back to top

If I let myself be bought then I am no longer free.

HYPATIA - Greek philosopher, mathematician and astronomer (370 - 415)

IP Logged

LifeOrDeath

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 1548

Re: The most retarded circular argument
Reply #146 - Aug 7^th, 2015 at 2:05pm

freediver wrote on Aug 7^th, 2015 at 1:55pm: