Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 ... 14
Send Topic Print
The most retarded circular argument (Read 10110 times)
LifeOrDeath
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1548
Re: The most retarded circular argument
Reply #30 - Aug 4th, 2015 at 5:14pm
 
Quran (9:20) - "Those who believe, and have left their homes and striven with their wealth and their lives in Allah's way are of much greater worth in Allah's sight. These are they who are triumphant."  The Arabic word interpreted as "striving" in this verse is the same root as "Jihad".  The context is obviously holy war.

Quran (9:29) - "Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued."  "People of the Book" refers to Christians and Jews.  According to this verse, they are to be violently subjugated, with the sole justification being their religious status.  Verse 9:33 tells Muslims that Allah has charted them to make Islam "superior over all religions." This chapter was one of the final "revelations" from Allah and it set in motion the tenacious military expansion, in which Muhammad's companions managed to conquer two-thirds of the Christian world in the next 100 years.  Islam is intended to dominate all other people and faiths.

Quran (9:30) - "And the Jews say: Ezra is the son of Allah; and the Christians say: The Messiah is the son of Allah; these are the words of their mouths; they imitate the saying of those who disbelieved before; may Allah destroy them; how they are turned away!"

Quran (9:38-39) - "O ye who believe! what is the matter with you, that, when ye are asked to go forth in the cause of Allah, ye cling heavily to the earth? Do ye prefer the life of this world to the Hereafter? But little is the comfort of this life, as compared with the Hereafter. Unless ye go forth, He will punish you with a grievous penalty, and put others in your place."  This is a warning to those who refuse to fight, that they will be punished with Hell.

Quran (9:41) - "Go forth, light-armed and heavy-armed, and strive with your wealth and your lives in the way of Allah! That is best for you if ye but knew."  See also the verse that follows (9:42) - "If there had been immediate gain (in sight), and the journey easy, they would (all) without doubt have followed thee, but the distance was long, (and weighed) on them"  This contradicts the myth that Muslims are to fight only in self-defense, since the wording implies that battle will be waged a long distance from home (in another country and on Christian soil, in this case, according to the historians).

Quran (9:73) - "O Prophet! strive hard against the unbelievers and the hypocrites and be unyielding to them; and their abode is hell, and evil is the destination."  Dehumanizing those who reject Islam, by reminding Muslims that unbelievers are merely firewood for Hell, makes it easier to justify slaughter.  It also explains why today's devout Muslims have little regard for those outside the faith.

Quran (9:88) - "But the Messenger, and those who believe with him, strive and fight with their wealth and their persons: for them are (all) good things: and it is they who will prosper."

Quran (9:111) - "Allah hath purchased of the believers their persons and their goods; for theirs (in return) is the garden (of Paradise): they fight in His cause, and slay and are slain: a promise binding on Him in truth, through the Law, the Gospel, and the Quran: and who is more faithful to his covenant than Allah? then rejoice in the bargain which ye have concluded: that is the achievement supreme."  How does the Quran define a true believer?

Quran (9:123) - "O you who believe! fight those of the unbelievers who are near to you and let them find in you hardness."

Quran (17:16) - "And when We wish to destroy a town, We send Our commandment to the people of it who lead easy lives, but they transgress therein; thus the word proves true against it, so We destroy it with utter destruction."  Note that the crime is moral transgression, and the punishment is "utter destruction."  (Before ordering the 9/11 attacks, Osama bin Laden first issued Americans an invitation to Islam).

Quran (18:65-81) - This parable lays the theological groundwork for honor killings, in which a family member is murdered because they brought shame to the family, either through apostasy or perceived moral indiscretion.  The story (which is not found in any Jewish or Christian source) tells of Moses encountering a man with "special knowledge" who does things which don't seem to make sense on the surface, but are then justified according to later explanation.  One such action is to murder a youth for no apparent reason (74).  However, the wise man later explains that it was feared that the boy would "grieve" his parents by "disobedience and ingratitude."  He was killed so that Allah could provide them a 'better' son.  (Note: This is one reason why honor killing is sanctioned by Sharia.  Reliance of the Traveler (Umdat al-Saliq) says that punishment for murder is not applicable when a parent or grandparent kills their offspring (o.1.1-2).)

Quran (21:44) - "We gave the good things of this life to these men and their fathers until the period grew long for them; See they not that We gradually reduce the land (in their control) from its outlying borders? Is it then they who will win?"

Quran (25:52) - "Therefore listen not to the Unbelievers, but strive against them with the utmost strenuousness..."   "Strive against" is Jihad - obviously not in the personal context.  It's also significant to point out that this is a Meccan verse.
Back to top
 

There is no evidence of the existence of a muslim,mohammed,or quran until 60 years  after mohammed was supposed to have died. Grin Grin Grin Posting on islam just encourages them and is a waste of time.
 
IP Logged
 
LifeOrDeath
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1548
Re: The most retarded circular argument
Reply #31 - Aug 4th, 2015 at 5:15pm
 

Quran (33:60-62) - "If the hypocrites, and those in whose hearts is a disease, and the alarmists in the city do not cease, We verily shall urge thee on against them, then they will be your neighbors in it but a little while.  Accursed, they will be seized wherever found and slain with a (fierce) slaughter."   This passage sanctions the slaughter (rendered "merciless" and "horrible murder" in other translations) against three groups: Hypocrites (Muslims who refuse to "fight in the way of Allah" (3:167) and hence don't act as Muslims should), those with "diseased hearts" (which include Jews and Christians 5:51-52), and "alarmists" or "agitators who include those who merely speak out against Islam, according to Muhammad's biographers.  It is worth noting that the victims are to be sought out by Muslims, which is what today's terrorists do.  If this passage is meant merely to apply to the city of Medina, then it is unclear why it is included in Allah's eternal word to Muslim generations.

Quran (47:3-4) - "Those who disbelieve follow falsehood, while those who believe follow the truth from their Lord... So, when you meet (in fight Jihad in Allah's Cause), those who disbelieve smite at their necks till when you have killed and wounded many of them, then bind a bond firmly (on them, i.e. take them as captives)... If it had been Allah's Will, He Himself could certainly have punished them (without you). But (He lets you fight), in order to test you, some with others. But those who are killed in the Way of Allah, He will never let their deeds be lost."  Those who reject Allah are to be killed in Jihad.  The wounded are to be held captive for ransom.  The only reason Allah doesn't do the dirty work himself is to to test the faithfulness of Muslims.  Those who kill pass the test.

Quran (47:35) - "Be not weary and faint-hearted, crying for peace, when ye should be uppermost (Shakir: "have the upper hand") for Allah is with you,"   

Quran (48:17) - "There is no blame for the blind, nor is there blame for the lame, nor is there blame for the sick (that they go not forth to war). And whoso obeyeth Allah and His messenger, He will make him enter Gardens underneath which rivers flow; and whoso turneth back, him will He punish with a painful doom."  Contemporary apologists sometimes claim that Jihad means 'spiritual struggle.'  Is so, then why are the blind, lame and sick exempted?  This verse also says that those who do not fight will suffer torment in hell.

Quran (48:29) - "Muhammad is the messenger of Allah. And those with him are hard (ruthless) against the disbelievers and merciful among themselves"  Islam is not about treating everyone equally.  This verse tells Muslims that there are two very distinct standards that are applied based on religious status.  Also the word used for 'hard' or 'ruthless' in this verse shares the same root as the word translated as 'painful' or severe' to describe Hell in over 25 other verses including 65:10, 40:46 and 50:26..

Quran (61:4) - "Surely Allah loves those who fight in His way"  Religion of Peace, indeed! The verse explicitly refers to "battle array" meaning that it is speaking of physical conflict.  This is followed by (61:9): "He it is who has sent His Messenger (Mohammed) with guidance and the religion of truth (Islam) to make it victorious over all religions even though the infidels may resist."  (See next verse, below).  Infidels who resist Islamic rule are to be fought.

Quran (61:10-12) - "O You who believe! Shall I guide you to a commerce that will save you from a painful torment. That you believe in Allah and His Messenger (Muhammad ), and that you strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allah with your wealth and your lives, that will be better for you, if you but know! (If you do so) He will forgive you your sins, and admit you into Gardens under which rivers flow, and pleasant dwelling in Gardens of 'Adn - Eternity ['Adn (Edn) Paradise], that is indeed the great success."  This verse refers to physical battle in order to make Islam victorious over other religions (see above).  It uses the Arabic word, Jihad.

Quran (66:9) - "O Prophet! Strive against the disbelievers and the hypocrites, and be stern with them. Hell will be their home, a hapless journey's end."  The root word of "Jihad" is used again here.  The context is clearly holy war, and the scope of violence is broadened to include "hypocrites" - those who call themselves Muslims but do not act as such.
Back to top
 

There is no evidence of the existence of a muslim,mohammed,or quran until 60 years  after mohammed was supposed to have died. Grin Grin Grin Posting on islam just encourages them and is a waste of time.
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 96331
Re: The most retarded circular argument
Reply #32 - Aug 4th, 2015 at 5:16pm
 
That's more like it, Matty. If you can get the whole Koran in, you might just crash the board.

Allah Uakbar, no?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
LifeOrDeath
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1548
Re: The most retarded circular argument
Reply #33 - Aug 4th, 2015 at 5:17pm
 
polite_gandalf wrote on Aug 4th, 2015 at 4:46pm:
LifeOrDeath wrote on Aug 4th, 2015 at 4:33pm:
You said the quran doesn't teach that. how do explain away all the scriptures then ?


I believe thats your job.



I'd say people that believe all that would be a wannabe homicidal maniac. Why wouldn't they ?

or don't they believe that ?
Back to top
 

There is no evidence of the existence of a muslim,mohammed,or quran until 60 years  after mohammed was supposed to have died. Grin Grin Grin Posting on islam just encourages them and is a waste of time.
 
IP Logged
 
LifeOrDeath
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1548
Re: The most retarded circular argument
Reply #34 - Aug 4th, 2015 at 5:17pm
 
Karnal wrote on Aug 4th, 2015 at 5:16pm:
That's more like it, Matty. If you can get the whole Koran in, you might just crash the board.

Allah Uakbar, no?


Take your babbling elsewhere troll.
Back to top
 

There is no evidence of the existence of a muslim,mohammed,or quran until 60 years  after mohammed was supposed to have died. Grin Grin Grin Posting on islam just encourages them and is a waste of time.
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 96331
Re: The most retarded circular argument
Reply #35 - Aug 4th, 2015 at 5:27pm
 
LifeOrDeath wrote on Aug 4th, 2015 at 5:19pm:
Are you capable of contributing to the discussion or do you just troll 24/7 ?

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: The most retarded circular argument
Reply #36 - Aug 4th, 2015 at 5:38pm
 
Thanks Matty, thats what we call "explaining away the scriptures".
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
LifeOrDeath
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1548
Re: The most retarded circular argument
Reply #37 - Aug 4th, 2015 at 5:42pm
 
polite_gandalf wrote on Aug 4th, 2015 at 5:38pm:
Thanks Matty, thats what we call "explaining away the scriptures".


Can't you read them ?

Matty, care to explain why those scriptures don't promote homicidal maniacs ?

After all they are from the quran and you said the quran doesn't promote someone becoming a homicidal maniac.

Or were you talking fluff ?

I fail to see why anyone who believes those scriptures would not be a wannabe homicidal maniac. Unless they really don't believe it and are therefore not a muslim.
Back to top
 

There is no evidence of the existence of a muslim,mohammed,or quran until 60 years  after mohammed was supposed to have died. Grin Grin Grin Posting on islam just encourages them and is a waste of time.
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 138855
Gender: male
Re: The most retarded circular argument
Reply #38 - Aug 4th, 2015 at 5:47pm
 
LifeOrDeath wrote on Aug 4th, 2015 at 5:42pm:
polite_gandalf wrote on Aug 4th, 2015 at 5:38pm:
Thanks Matty, thats what we call "explaining away the scriptures".


Can't you read them ?

Matty, care to explain why those scriptures don't promote homicidal maniacs ?

After all they are from the quran and you said the quran doesn't promote someone becoming a homicidal maniac.

Or were you talking fluff ?

I fail to see why anyone who believes those scriptures would not be a wannabe homicidal maniac. Unless they really don't believe it and are therefore not a muslim.



You believe it.

You must be a Muslim.

Interesting.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: The most retarded circular argument
Reply #39 - Aug 4th, 2015 at 5:55pm
 
LifeOrDeath wrote on Aug 4th, 2015 at 5:42pm:
Matty, care to explain why those scriptures don't promote homicidal maniacs ?


Because they are cherry picked. You left out the parts about not transgressing limits or to accept peace whenever it is offered or to never wrong those who have never wronged you.

I could quote you twice as many quotes that implore muslims to be peaceful and forgiving, eg:

Quote:
By which Allah guides those who pursue His pleasure to the ways of peace and brings them out from darknesses into the light, by His permission, and guides them to a straight path.


5:16
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
LifeOrDeath
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1548
Re: The most retarded circular argument
Reply #40 - Aug 4th, 2015 at 6:07pm
 
polite_gandalf wrote on Aug 4th, 2015 at 5:55pm:
LifeOrDeath wrote on Aug 4th, 2015 at 5:42pm:
Matty, care to explain why those scriptures don't promote homicidal maniacs ?


Because they are cherry picked. You left out the parts about not transgressing limits or to accept peace whenever it is offered or to never wrong those who have never wronged you.

I could quote you twice as many quotes that implore muslims to be peaceful and forgiving, eg:

Quote:
By which Allah guides those who pursue His pleasure to the ways of peace and brings them out from darknesses into the light, by His permission, and guides them to a straight path.


5:16


Cherry picked Grin Grin

So at the end of the day you cannot explain them away as being applicable to every muslim today.

Even if what you said was true that would make the quran the biggest hypocritical book eva and not to mention still promoting people to become wannabe homicidal maniacs.

Anyway back on the subject at hand. Your original answer of 'NO' that the quran does not show a muslim is a wannabe homicidal maniac. I posted scriptures from the quran which teach such things along with the definition of homicidal and the word maniac which obviously fit the quranic teachings.

You have NOT refuted any of those scriptures nor told us why they are not applicable today. They are not a few cherry picked scriptures but a plethora of them for your easy reading.

Why would a muslim not agree with them and strive to be like them if they are words from god ?

This is the problem with islam, the author never thought it through. This is precisely why muslims have such anger issues is they know this. They know the west sees straight through it.

You can cry infidel all you like and say its not true but its all there in history and print.

Back to top
 

There is no evidence of the existence of a muslim,mohammed,or quran until 60 years  after mohammed was supposed to have died. Grin Grin Grin Posting on islam just encourages them and is a waste of time.
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49308
At my desk.
Re: The most retarded circular argument
Reply #41 - Aug 4th, 2015 at 6:33pm
 
polite_gandalf wrote on Aug 4th, 2015 at 2:29pm:
Yadda wrote on Aug 4th, 2015 at 2:10pm:
Dictionary;
credible = = able to be believed; convincing.


Or in other words:

credible = = the claim that a religion is best represented by the actions and convictions of the few, and not the actions and convictions of the majority.


Should Islam be represented by the actions of the few, the many, or the one Gandalf?

Quote:
Because they are cherry picked. You left out the parts about not transgressing limits or to accept peace whenever it is offered or to never wrong those who have never wronged you.


How does this fit in with your Jew=Borg justification for Muhammed slaughtering 800 innocent people? It sounds to me like you are the one doing the cherry picking Gandalf.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Aug 4th, 2015 at 6:42pm by freediver »  

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: The most retarded circular argument
Reply #42 - Aug 4th, 2015 at 6:42pm
 
I'll explain cherry picking to you matty:

It is quoting this verse:

LifeOrDeath wrote on Aug 4th, 2015 at 5:13pm:
Quran (8:57) - "If thou comest on them in the war, deal with them so as to strike fear in those who are behind them, that haply they may remember." 


while omitting this one immediately preceding it:

8:56: The ones with whom you made a treaty but then they break their pledge every time, and they do not fear Allah .

and also this one after it:

8:61: And if they incline to peace, then incline to it [also] and rely upon Allah . Indeed, it is He who is the Hearing, the Knowing.
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: The most retarded circular argument
Reply #43 - Aug 4th, 2015 at 6:42pm
 
freediver wrote on Aug 4th, 2015 at 6:33pm:
polite_gandalf wrote on Aug 4th, 2015 at 2:29pm:
Yadda wrote on Aug 4th, 2015 at 2:10pm:
Dictionary;
credible = = able to be believed; convincing.


Or in other words:

credible = = the claim that a religion is best represented by the actions and convictions of the few, and not the actions and convictions of the majority.


Should Islam be represented by the actions of the few, the many, or the one Gandalf?


The many (majority).
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49308
At my desk.
Re: The most retarded circular argument
Reply #44 - Aug 4th, 2015 at 6:43pm
 
Ah, so Islam is now a democracy?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 ... 14
Send Topic Print