Australian Politics Forum - 97% of scientists Horsesheet

President Elect, The Mechanic

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17501
Gender: male

97% of scientists Horsesheet
Aug 4^th, 2015 at 1:48pm

Quote:

97 Articles Refuting The "97% Consensus"

Written by Andrew, Popular Technology.net on 21 December 2014.

The 97% "consensus" study, Cook et al. (2013) has been thoroughly refuted in scholarly peer-reviewed journals, by major news media, public policy organizations and think tanks, highly credentialed scientists and extensively in the climate blogosphere.

The shoddy methodology of Cook's study has been shown to be so fatally flawed that well known climate scientists have publicly spoken out against it,

"The '97% consensus' article is poorly conceived, poorly designed and poorly executed. It obscures the complexities of the climate issue and it is a sign of the desperately poor level of public and policy debate in this country [UK] that the energy minister should cite it."
- Mike Hulme, Ph.D. Professor of Climate Change, University of East Anglia (UEA)

The following is a list of 97 articles that refute Cook's (poorly conceived, poorly designed and poorly executed) 97% "consensus" study.

The fact that anyone continues to bring up such soundly debunked nonsense like Cook's study is an embarrassment to science

.

that's you Spartacus you NUMB SKULL

http://www.climatechangedispatch.com/97-articles-refuting-the-97-percent-consens...

Back to top

Q

The STORM has arrived
Every Dog Has Its Day...
Dark to Light.
Sheep no more.

IP Logged

President Elect, The Mechanic Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 17501 Gender:	Re: 97% of scientists Horsesheet Reply #1 - Aug 4^th, 2015 at 1:50pm http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamestaylor/2013/05/30/global-warming-alarmists-caug...
Back to top	Q The STORM has arrived Every Dog Has Its Day... Dark to Light. Sheep no more. IP Logged

innocentbystander. Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 4723 Gender:	Re: 97% of scientists Horsesheet Reply #2 - Aug 4^th, 2015 at 1:52pm Its propaganda, the climate cult is not averse to using propaganda, they will lie out of their arse if they have to, all for the cause, and not the earthly one either, for the political one.
Back to top	IP Logged

Unforgiven

Gold Member

Offline

I have sinned

Posts: 8879
Gender: male

Re: 97% of scientists Horsesheet
Reply #3 - Aug 4^th, 2015 at 2:16pm

President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Aug 4^th, 2015 at 1:48pm:

Quote:

97 Articles Refuting The "97% Consensus"

Written by Andrew, Popular Technology.net on 21 December 2014.

The 97% "consensus" study, Cook et al. (2013) has been thoroughly refuted in scholarly peer-reviewed journals, by major news media, public policy organizations and think tanks, highly credentialed scientists and extensively in the climate blogosphere.

The shoddy methodology of Cook's study has been shown to be so fatally flawed that well known climate scientists have publicly spoken out against it,

"The '97% consensus' article is poorly conceived, poorly designed and poorly executed. It obscures the complexities of the climate issue and it is a sign of the desperately poor level of public and policy debate in this country [UK] that the energy minister should cite it."
- Mike Hulme, Ph.D. Professor of Climate Change, University of East Anglia (UEA)

The following is a list of 97 articles that refute Cook's (poorly conceived, poorly designed and poorly executed) 97% "consensus" study.

The fact that anyone continues to bring up such soundly debunked nonsense like Cook's study is an embarrassment to science

.

that's you Spartacus you NUMB SKULL

http://www.climatechangedispatch.com/97-articles-refuting-the-97-percent-consens...

The Mechanic wins a Peter Heater from the vagina knitting lady.

Back to top

“I’ll let you be in my dreams if I can be in yours” Bob Dylan

IP Logged

ImSpartacus2

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 6913

Re: 97% of scientists Horsesheet
Reply #4 - Aug 4^th, 2015 at 2:27pm

This argument is actually very interesting because it is a window into how the idiologically motivated climate change denier thinks. You see when they're confronted with 97% of climate experts telling them that climate change is almost certainly happening someone like Mechanic has a choice. He can either admit that he is full of BS and the truth is that he couldn't care less what happens to the world and humanity when he dies OR he can pretend he accepts a logically flawed argument that the obvious and transparent consensus between the experts is not a consensus at all. Now in that case (mechanic reasons) you can accuse him of faulty logic (which is not so bad since we all occasionally fall into logical error) but you can't accuse him of being the reprehensible traitorous c@#t that he is. So that's why he posts this cr@p.

Back to top

IP Logged

Stratos

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 4725

Re: 97% of scientists Horsesheet
Reply #5 - Aug 4^th, 2015 at 2:57pm

President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Aug 4^th, 2015 at 1:48pm:

has been thoroughly refuted in scholarly peer-reviewed journals, by major news media, public policy organizations and think tanks, highly credentialed scientists and extensively in the climate blogosphere.

Wow, 97 peer reviewed articles refuting one position?

Oh wait, grand total of 3. I'll read them when I get some time, but your article is incredibly misleading if you took even 2 seconds to glance at it you would realise this.

Back to top

Pete Waldo wrote on Jan 15^th, 2014 at 11:24pm:

Thus killing those Canaanite babies while they were still innocent, was a particularly merciful act

IP Logged

lee Gold Member Online Australian Politics Posts: 18058 Gender:	Re: 97% of scientists Horsesheet Reply #6 - Aug 4^th, 2015 at 6:29pm Of course you could analyse the Cook paper. 41 papers out of 11,944 explicitly said that Man was the cause of most of the warming since 1950. That is 0.3%. The paper is at the Institute of Physics.
Back to top	IP Logged

President Elect, The Mechanic

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17501
Gender: male

Re: 97% of scientists Horsesheet
Reply #7 - Aug 4^th, 2015 at 7:05pm

lee wrote on Aug 4^th, 2015 at 6:29pm:

Of course you could analyse the Cook paper. 41 papers out of 11,944 explicitly said that Man was the cause of most of the warming since 1950. That is 0.3%.

The paper is at the Institute of Physics.

these numb skulls can't think for themselves..

they are welfare dependant losers who need to believe in something..

anything...

so

they join the church of Climate Change ....

part of being in the church of climate change is reciting the LIE ( as often as you can ) that 97% of all scientists on the planet earth believe in Global Warming..

durrrrrrrrrrrrrrr Cheesy

Back to top

Q

The STORM has arrived
Every Dog Has Its Day...
Dark to Light.
Sheep no more.

IP Logged

Inyss Junior Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 56 Gender:	Re: 97% of scientists Horsesheet Reply #8 - Aug 4^th, 2015 at 7:12pm So deforestation + burning ancient forests (fossil fuels) + 1 squillion animals farting = 1 healthy planet with no global warming. I expect you believe in God as well.
Back to top	IP Logged

President Elect, The Mechanic

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17501
Gender: male

Re: 97% of scientists Horsesheet
Reply #9 - Aug 4^th, 2015 at 7:25pm

Inyss wrote on Aug 4^th, 2015 at 7:12pm:

So deforestation + burning ancient forests (fossil fuels) + 1 squillion animals farting = 1 healthy planet with no global warming. I expect you believe in God as well.

i'll forgive you are you seem kinda new and don't know my philosophy's

my pet hates.. deforestation...

fossil fuels .. will run out..

global warming.. what global warming? its a bugger*** lie Angry

world population... needs to decease.. STOP IMMIGRATION!!! Angry

Back to top

Q

The STORM has arrived
Every Dog Has Its Day...
Dark to Light.
Sheep no more.

IP Logged

Inyss

Junior Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 56
Gender: female

Re: 97% of scientists Horsesheet
Reply #10 - Aug 4^th, 2015 at 8:23pm

Perhaps I should let you know my philosophies Mechanic, maybe we are not so different in many aspects.
1. Rid the world of the main culprits of over-population. ie organised religion.
2. Yes, yes, yes. Decrease the world population by at least 30%. Start by putting contraceptives in the water supply in over-populated countries. This may not need to happen if number 1. is implemented.
3. In our own country, Oz, supply incentives for the first 2 children only and nothing, nil, zilch, zero, for any following children.
4. Why are we still wiping our a***s with old growth forest. Where are all the timber farms which should have been planted aeons ago. Where are all the farms producing the wonder crop, commercial hemp. And no I've never done dope, grass, hooter.
5. And no, I'm not a greenie and have definitely never voted Green. I'm also not a Leftard or from the Right flank, I hate the sodding lot.
RANT OVER

Back to top

IP Logged

Inyss Junior Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 56 Gender:	Re: 97% of scientists Horsesheet Reply #11 - Aug 4^th, 2015 at 8:25pm And I believe in climate change because the reef, which is at my front door is changing and I don't like it one little bit. THE END
Back to top	IP Logged

President Elect, The Mechanic

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17501
Gender: male

Re: 97% of scientists Horsesheet
Reply #12 - Aug 5^th, 2015 at 7:17am

ImSpartacus2 wrote on Aug 4^th, 2015 at 2:27pm:

This argument is actually very interesting because it is a window into how the idiologically motivated climate change denier thinks. You see when they're confronted with 97% of climate experts telling them that climate change is almost certainly happening someone like Mechanic has a choice. He can either admit that he is full of BS and the truth is that he couldn't care less what happens to the world and humanity when he dies OR he can pretend he accepts a logically flawed argument that the obvious and transparent consensus between the experts is not a consensus at all. Now in that case (mechanic reasons) you can accuse him of faulty logic (which is not so bad since we all occasionally fall into logical error) but you can't accuse him of being the reprehensible traitorous c@#t that he is. So that's why he posts this cr@p.

what?

the Truth???

you don't like that do you... there's only a handful of numbskulls that are still quoting the bullshit of the 97% lie...

you just happen to be one of those numbskulls...

sucks to be you... Grin

the "scientist" also said that it was going to be a dry winter...

I disagreed and said that it was going to be a cold wet winter..

guess who was right... Wink

Back to top

Q

The STORM has arrived
Every Dog Has Its Day...
Dark to Light.
Sheep no more.

IP Logged

Redmond Neck Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 21740 ACT Gender:	Re: 97% of scientists Horsesheet Reply #13 - Aug 5^th, 2015 at 9:47am I think I would believe some of these organisations rather than some denier nutters such as yourself Mechanic. http://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/
Back to top	BAN ALL THESE ABO SITES RECOGNITIONS. ALL AUSTRALIA IS FOR ALL AUSTRALIANS! IP Logged

Redmond Neck Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 21740 ACT Gender:	Re: 97% of scientists Horsesheet Reply #14 - Aug 5^th, 2015 at 9:51am We should also consider official scientific bodies and what they think about climate change. There are no national or major scientific institutions anywhere in the world that dispute the theory of anthropogenic climate change. Not one. https://www.skepticalscience.com/global-warming-scientific-consensus.htm
Back to top	BAN ALL THESE ABO SITES RECOGNITIONS. ALL AUSTRALIA IS FOR ALL AUSTRALIANS! IP Logged