Not bad Herbie, could've done without the merkin imo...

Ajax wrote on Aug 5^th, 2015 at 5:42pm:


Sorry, but I came up through the '50's when women had meat on their legs.

At that time all the glamour shots of women showed full thighs and well-rounded bodies. They were shapely with their womanly assets. Full hips, full bums, etc.

But then things went pear-shaped.

The homosexuals who dominated the fashion and modelling industries - with the help of the 'Health Studio' industries - started propagandising to these full-bodied gorgeous-looking young women that they were 'fat' and "needed to lose weight".

Within a very short time women then started to present themselves as 'lithe', 'slim' and 'athletic-looking' in Mens magazines, beauty contests, movies, advertisements for beach-wear, etc ... (ie. skinny and shapeless, and with body-types that resemble exactly that of tall 14-year old boys).

The Gay community had achieved its purpose of masculinising the female form - and the health studios were making a motsa with their exercise rooms  packed to the rafters with gorgeous females on a desperate and sweaty mission to reduce their body-mass to that of early-teenage boys.

And this trend continues.

I was once working with a gang unloading shipping containers in a warehouse yard - and created a seismic event when I told them I thought Elle Macpherson was ugly in face and had a very 'ordinary body' that was on the skinny side with stringy muscles showing.

Have a look at the world beauty contests now ... skinny ... skinny ... skinny.

You younger generationers haven't a clue. You've been brainwashed into thinking a young woman's body should look 'athletic' with as little curves and dips as possible.

The burlesque woman in my video is exactly how the Ideal Woman was perceived for at least 100 years before the gays and the gym owners took control of the agenda.

Just saying. 

(A 'merkin' - that's a new one on me. That'll be my Word for the Day: 'merkin'.)

Ajax wrote on Aug 5^th, 2015 at 5:42pm:



None of those girls look like virgins.

Lord Herbert wrote on Aug 6^th, 2015 at 7:52am:


Have you considered the possibility that for some of us "younger" girls....we were tall, skinny, athletic sticks with no curves because irrespective of how much we ate, we had a fast metabolism and could not put on weight?

I can personally assure you that it was not an easy gig being the only girl wearing a tank top with no bra underneath for PE at school and pretending I had a period like everyone else around me did.

At age 15, my body finally decided it was my time....but still no curves or boobs appeared.

And I never really needed a bra either ...so I used to wear those push up bras to help me look feminine. Even then, that was at age 18 and I was at University plus working for a Corporation so I felt compelled to look the part.

Then finally....it happened. I got pregnant and gave birth to my twins and for the 1st time there were decent curves around my hips and nice feminine boobs which made me feel right and helped boost my confidence.

But now I have the body of a mummy.... complete with stretch marks on my tummy and a beauty of a caesarean scar.

That woman in your clip has the body of a mummy in her 40's Herb. It really isn't much to look at IMO.

I see it every single day.

Lisa Jones wrote on Aug 6^th, 2015 at 8:15am:


Hold it right THERE!, female dudette.

I have been specifically referring to those young women who go before the professional cameras as models for advertising products that show their figure, and for those who tread the board-walk in fashion shows.

And those who appear in movies in roles where their legs appear in beach scenes, etc.

Skinny as tall 14 year old schoolboys. A pederast's delight. And all by design, courtesy of the gays and the exercise industries.

Shock! Horror! "Darling - does my bum look big in this dress?"

"It does, dear, and you KNOW that ruins my fantasies about making love to you as a boy ... "

"Oh gosh! I'm sorry about that, Rodney! We'd better signing me up at the local gym".

Newsflash : Your arse is supposed to look 'Kardashian' in that dress - that's the whole purpose of that tight-ass dress!

Lord Herbert wrote on Aug 6^th, 2015 at 8:38am:


No it's not!!!!

And Kim's big, fat bulky @r$e and thighs look like $hit.

She needs urgent liposuction in those areas IMO. It just looks bloody awful. Yuk!

Look Herb...you're starting to sound like my husband. I'm beginning to think that all men go cuckoo after they turn 55.

A woman's body just needs to be average and in proportion.

That means no big @r$e, no big boobs, no big thighs.

herb.. did this escape from the "tool shed"..

if nothing else I am all about "class"  which you appear to have none of..stripping is hardly news...it is after all the second oldest industry... you should have gone through this stage in your teens herb...

we know you are a late developer.. but really even this seems extreme...

belly dancers have to have navel piercing ..

well it aint happening..