Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 ... 17
Send Topic Print
Can you support atrocities and human rights? (Read 42634 times)
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 95898
Gender: male
Re: Can you support atrocities and human rights?
Reply #15 - Aug 14th, 2015 at 9:21pm
 
freediver wrote on Aug 14th, 2015 at 5:40pm:
Quote:
It had nothing to do with Freeeeeedom and democracy.


Did they not intend to set up a democracy?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 95898
Gender: male
Re: Can you support atrocities and human rights?
Reply #16 - Aug 14th, 2015 at 9:26pm
 
Lord Herbert wrote on Aug 14th, 2015 at 6:44pm:
polite_gandalf wrote on Aug 14th, 2015 at 11:05am:
Hiroshima and Nagasaki are relevant episodes here: tens of thousands of innocent men women and children were deliberately targeted and killed in order to bring about the end to a war.


Dear Jesus, you've got it wrong right from the very start.

It was the cities that were targetted for total destruction - not the people.

Same with Dresden.

Killing any number of civilians would not have had any bearing on persuading these military dictatorships to surrender unconditionally.Tojo's mob couldn't give a rat's arse about civilian casualties.

If the allies could have personally escorted the citizens away from the drop-zones, they would have.

Please stop inventing fanciful scenarios, gandalf.

Tojo had already announced that the Japanese people would fight to the last soldier and civilian if the allies made landfall on Japanese soil.


link

link




The cities, was it? They originally wanted to blow up Fukuoka.

Enola Gay ran out of fuel, so they settled on Nagasaki.

Whoops.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 95898
Gender: male
Re: Can you support atrocities and human rights?
Reply #17 - Aug 14th, 2015 at 9:28pm
 
freediver wrote on Aug 14th, 2015 at 7:17pm:
Quote:
If you look at the way the Bremer regime started off


Do you need to look at it a special way Gandalf? Is this like my skills at saying things without actually saying them?

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Secret Wars
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3928
Gender: male
Re: Can you support atrocities and human rights?
Reply #18 - Aug 14th, 2015 at 9:29pm
 
IKarnal wrote on Aug 14th, 2015 at 9:26pm:
Lord Herbert wrote on Aug 14th, 2015 at 6:44pm:
polite_gandalf wrote on Aug 14th, 2015 at 11:05am:
Hiroshima and Nagasaki are relevant episodes here: tens of thousands of innocent men women and children were deliberately targeted and killed in order to bring about the end to a war.


Dear Jesus, you've got it wrong right from the very start.

It was the cities that were targetted for total destruction - not the people.

Same with Dresden.

Killing any number of civilians would not have had any bearing on persuading these military dictatorships to surrender unconditionally.Tojo's mob couldn't give a rat's arse about civilian casualties.

If the allies could have personally escorted the citizens away from the drop-zones, they would have.

Please stop inventing fanciful scenarios, gandalf.

Tojo had already announced that the Japanese people would fight to the last soldier and civilian if the allies made landfall on Japanese soil.


link

link




The cities, was it? They originally wanted to blow up Fukuoka.

Enola Gay ran out of fuel, so they settled on Nagasaki.

Whoops.


I thought the primary target was concealed by cloud.  There should be no doubt that cities were deliberately targeted and that there was a list of target cities.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: Can you support atrocities and human rights?
Reply #19 - Aug 15th, 2015 at 8:56am
 
Lord Herbert wrote on Aug 14th, 2015 at 6:44pm:
It was the cities that were targetted for total destruction - not the people.


Grin Grin

Quote of the year.
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
double plus good
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 5693
Gender: male
Re: Can you support atrocities and human rights?
Reply #20 - Aug 15th, 2015 at 9:18am
 
The Japanese didn't want to surrender. It took 2 bombs and they still weren't going to surrender. These are the figures from the  last 2 islands the Americans attacked (Okinawa and Iwo Jima)-

Okinawa-The Americans paid a large price for Okinawa: 12,000 Allied dead and another 38,000 wounded.  But the Japanese lost more than 100,000 men.150,000 local civilians were killed or committed suicide with many casualties.

Iwo Jima-  Almost 7000 Americans were killed; another 18,000 were wounded. But the Japanese casualties were horrific.  Only 200 of the 21,000 soldiers deployed survived to be taken prisoner.

Now if the allies invaded mainland Japan imagine the casualties. Imagine if the war dragged on and Russia got involved. Consider the continuation of the aerial bombing campaign over japan and  the further casualties?? MILLIONS UPON MILLIONS OF PEOPLE!!!!! You demented leftards need to pull your heads out of your assholes and think this through!

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Lord Herbert
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 34441
Gender: male
Re: Can you support atrocities and human rights?
Reply #21 - Aug 15th, 2015 at 12:06pm
 
polite_gandalf wrote on Aug 15th, 2015 at 8:56am:
Lord Herbert wrote on Aug 14th, 2015 at 6:44pm:
It was the cities that were targetted for total destruction - not the people.


Grin Grin

Quote of the year.


I can smell the fear, gandalf ... which means I've got you on the run. Just wait 'til Maria gets back from her latté-and-lamingtons at her local North Shore shopping mall. She'll have you for supper on this subject. She's appeared out of the blue as your worst nightmare. You can run but you can't hide from her sharp claws, gandalf.    

Meeanwhile ... Ever heard of 'collateral damage'?

Since Time Immemorial collateral damage has been an integral part of war.

It was only in the Iraq war that we first witnessed ground troops being under orders from Washington to cherry-pick their targets with house-to-house fighting so as to minimise 'collateral damage' and its subsequent political fallout.

Hence 3000 US soldiers lost their lives in very quick succession which otherwise would not have happened if they had been allowed to take out targets from a distance, using cannon and mortar fire as was the case in Vietnam and WWII.




Back to top
« Last Edit: Aug 15th, 2015 at 12:20pm by Lord Herbert »  
 
IP Logged
 
Lord Herbert
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 34441
Gender: male
Re: Can you support atrocities and human rights?
Reply #22 - Aug 15th, 2015 at 12:18pm
 
double plus good wrote on Aug 15th, 2015 at 9:18am:
The Japanese didn't want to surrender.


Correct.

The Nipponese military brass wanted Japan to go down fighting, no matter what.

Civilians, towns, cities ... all were to be sacrificed in the interest of preserving the Bushido code of honour that the Japanese prized so highly.

gandalf doesn't understand these subtle nuances of an ancient culture any more than he understands or admits to the subtle nuances of Islamic doctrine that allows for, and sanctions, the barbarities committed by ISIS and others.   

It was just one solitary person who saved Japan from total annihilation ... the Divine Emperor Hirohito (pbuh).



Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 95898
Gender: male
Re: Can you support atrocities and human rights?
Reply #23 - Aug 15th, 2015 at 12:32pm
 
Secret Wars wrote on Aug 14th, 2015 at 9:29pm:
IKarnal wrote on Aug 14th, 2015 at 9:26pm:
Lord Herbert wrote on Aug 14th, 2015 at 6:44pm:
polite_gandalf wrote on Aug 14th, 2015 at 11:05am:
Hiroshima and Nagasaki are relevant episodes here: tens of thousands of innocent men women and children were deliberately targeted and killed in order to bring about the end to a war.


Dear Jesus, you've got it wrong right from the very start.

It was the cities that were targetted for total destruction - not the people.

Same with Dresden.

Killing any number of civilians would not have had any bearing on persuading these military dictatorships to surrender unconditionally.Tojo's mob couldn't give a rat's arse about civilian casualties.

If the allies could have personally escorted the citizens away from the drop-zones, they would have.

Please stop inventing fanciful scenarios, gandalf.

Tojo had already announced that the Japanese people would fight to the last soldier and civilian if the allies made landfall on Japanese soil.


link

link




The cities, was it? They originally wanted to blow up Fukuoka.

Enola Gay ran out of fuel, so they settled on Nagasaki.

Whoops.


I thought the primary target was concealed by cloud.  There should be no doubt that cities were deliberately targeted and that there was a list of target cities. 


They hit the wrong city. Nagasaki did not have heavy industry. All it had was lots of people. There was no military rationale to take it out whatsoever.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
double plus good
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 5693
Gender: male
Re: Can you support atrocities and human rights?
Reply #24 - Aug 15th, 2015 at 12:42pm
 
Karnal wrote on Aug 15th, 2015 at 12:32pm:
Secret Wars wrote on Aug 14th, 2015 at 9:29pm:
IKarnal wrote on Aug 14th, 2015 at 9:26pm:
Lord Herbert wrote on Aug 14th, 2015 at 6:44pm:
polite_gandalf wrote on Aug 14th, 2015 at 11:05am:
Hiroshima and Nagasaki are relevant episodes here: tens of thousands of innocent men women and children were deliberately targeted and killed in order to bring about the end to a war.


Dear Jesus, you've got it wrong right from the very start.

It was the cities that were targetted for total destruction - not the people.

Same with Dresden.

Killing any number of civilians would not have had any bearing on persuading these military dictatorships to surrender unconditionally.Tojo's mob couldn't give a rat's arse about civilian casualties.

If the allies could have personally escorted the citizens away from the drop-zones, they would have.

Please stop inventing fanciful scenarios, gandalf.

Tojo had already announced that the Japanese people would fight to the last soldier and civilian if the allies made landfall on Japanese soil.


link

link




The cities, was it? They originally wanted to blow up Fukuoka.

Enola Gay ran out of fuel, so they settled on Nagasaki.

Whoops.


I thought the primary target was concealed by cloud.  There should be no doubt that cities were deliberately targeted and that there was a list of target cities. 


They hit the wrong city. Nagasaki did not have heavy industry. All it had was lots of people. There was no military rationale to take it out whatsoever.
The city of Nagasaki had been one of the largest sea ports in southern Japan and was of great wartime importance because of its wide-ranging industrial activity, including the production of ordnance, ships, military equipment, and other war materials.

NEXT!!!!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 95898
Gender: male
Re: Can you support atrocities and human rights?
Reply #25 - Aug 15th, 2015 at 12:42pm
 
double plus good wrote on Aug 15th, 2015 at 9:18am:
The Japanese didn't want to surrender. It took 2 bombs and they still weren't going to surrender.



True. There was no reason for them to surrender to the US, who had not even set foot on Japanese soil.

However, they did surrender. Why?

Russia announced they would join the war against Japan. Two days later, the Japanese surrendered. The last thing they wanted was an invasion from the north with the newly victorious Soviets.

If the "allies" had been united rather than scrapping over Europe, there would have been no reason to destroy two Japanese cities.

The reason the US did, however, was all about Europe and the new Cold War against the USSR.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 95898
Gender: male
Re: Can you support atrocities and human rights?
Reply #26 - Aug 15th, 2015 at 12:44pm
 
double plus good wrote on Aug 15th, 2015 at 12:42pm:
Karnal wrote on Aug 15th, 2015 at 12:32pm:
Secret Wars wrote on Aug 14th, 2015 at 9:29pm:
IKarnal wrote on Aug 14th, 2015 at 9:26pm:
Lord Herbert wrote on Aug 14th, 2015 at 6:44pm:
polite_gandalf wrote on Aug 14th, 2015 at 11:05am:
Hiroshima and Nagasaki are relevant episodes here: tens of thousands of innocent men women and children were deliberately targeted and killed in order to bring about the end to a war.


Dear Jesus, you've got it wrong right from the very start.

It was the cities that were targetted for total destruction - not the people.

Same with Dresden.

Killing any number of civilians would not have had any bearing on persuading these military dictatorships to surrender unconditionally.Tojo's mob couldn't give a rat's arse about civilian casualties.

If the allies could have personally escorted the citizens away from the drop-zones, they would have.

Please stop inventing fanciful scenarios, gandalf.

Tojo had already announced that the Japanese people would fight to the last soldier and civilian if the allies made landfall on Japanese soil.


link

link




The cities, was it? They originally wanted to blow up Fukuoka.

Enola Gay ran out of fuel, so they settled on Nagasaki.

Whoops.


I thought the primary target was concealed by cloud.  There should be no doubt that cities were deliberately targeted and that there was a list of target cities. 


They hit the wrong city. Nagasaki did not have heavy industry. All it had was lots of people. There was no military rationale to take it out whatsoever.
The city of Nagasaki had been one of the largest sea ports in southern Japan and was of great wartime importance because of its wide-ranging industrial activity, including the production of ordnance, ships, military equipment, and other war materials.

NEXT!!!!


Not at the time. Next.

Another reason they hit Nagasaki rather than the intended target Fukuoka was the Jap fighters on Enola Gay’s tail.

Imagine: that blast could well have taken place in the air.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Lord Herbert
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 34441
Gender: male
Re: Can you support atrocities and human rights?
Reply #27 - Aug 15th, 2015 at 12:50pm
 
Karnal wrote on Aug 15th, 2015 at 12:32pm:
They hit the wrong city. Nagasaki did not have heavy industry. All it had was lots of people. There was no military rationale to take it out whatsoever.


Grin Grin

Quote of next year.

Own goal, Bucko.

Hirohito got 'the message'

Nagasaki worked a treat.

With the help of The Bomb - he cut the war short.

Back to top
« Last Edit: Aug 15th, 2015 at 1:02pm by Lord Herbert »  
 
IP Logged
 
double plus good
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 5693
Gender: male
Re: Can you support atrocities and human rights?
Reply #28 - Aug 15th, 2015 at 12:50pm
 
For Karnal Knowledge- wikipedia.

Modern history[edit]
With the Meiji Restoration, Japan opened its doors once again to foreign trade and diplomatic relations. Nagasaki became a free port in 1859 and modernization began in earnest in 1868. Nagasaki was officially proclaimed a city on April 1, 1889. With Christianity legalized and the Kakure Kirishitan coming out of hiding, Nagasaki regained its earlier role as a center for Roman Catholicism in Japan.[citation needed]

During the Meiji period, Nagasaki became a center of heavy industry. Its main industry was ship-building, with the dockyards under control of Mitsubishi Heavy Industries becoming one of the prime contractors for the Imperial Japanese Navy, and with Nagasaki harbor used as an anchorage under the control of nearby Sasebo Naval District. During World War II, at the time of the nuclear attack on August 9, 1945, Nagasaki was an important industrial city, containing both plants of the Mitsubishi Steel and Arms Works, the Akunoura Engine Works, Mitsubishi Arms Plant, Mitsubishi Electric Shipyards, Mitsubishi Steel and Arms Works, Mitsubishi-Urakami Ordnance Works, several other small factories, and most of the ports storage and trans-shipment facilities, which employed about 90% of the city's labor force, and accounted for 90% of the city's industry. These connections with the Japanese war effort made Nagasaki a major target for bombing by the Allies during the war.

NEXT!!!!!! Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Lord Herbert
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 34441
Gender: male
Re: Can you support atrocities and human rights?
Reply #29 - Aug 15th, 2015 at 12:59pm
 
double plus good wrote on Aug 15th, 2015 at 12:50pm:
For Karnal Knowledge- wikipedia.

NEXT!!!!!! Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy


Look, let's help karnal, gandalf and the others stop tap-dancing around what they really mean to say on this issue.

To wit: Right or wrong - screw the Capitalist Yanks and their Imperial British allies.

See?

Your keyboard won't blow up, guys. Try it yourselves.

Here ... "bugger the Capitalist Yankee pigs and their Imperialist British allies!"

Go on, have a go.

You'll find it cathartic. Better than acupuncture.




Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 ... 17
Send Topic Print