2015-Aug-22 Sat 09:21 am
on AlJez this morning....
"I just want to be somewhere safe."
- An UNHAPPY, FRUSTRATED, female moslem Syrian refugee, in Greece, wanting to travel to Europe
She declares;
"I just want to be somewhere safe."
But, where there are numbers of moslems [and those who are not moslems], those who not moslem, are not safe!
Why so ?
Because where there are numbers of moslems, those moslems always seek to become rampant.
Dictionary;
rampant
1 flourishing or spreading unchecked.
2 unrestrained in action or performance.
3 lush in growth.And where moslems are able to become rampant [i.e. by becoming politically empowered], moslems always seek to become the oppressors of others.
Because it is the 'M.O.' of moslems, that were moslems gather, moslems always come into conflict with 'others'.
Why so ?
Because the religion of the moslem, teaches the moslem that he has a natural [and Allah given] right to rule over others.
[e.g. Koran 9.29]
And this moslem 'sense of entitlement' [which the moslem always has], to rule over others, always brings 'the moslem' into conflict with those 'others'.
Natural Law....
Quote:
"16. The state of war is a state of enmity and destruction; and therefore declaring by word or action, not a passionate and hasty, but sedate, settled design upon another man's life puts him in a state of war with him against whom he has declared such an intention, and so has exposed his life to the other's power to be taken away by him, or any one that joins with him in his defence, and espouses his quarrel; it being reasonable and just I should have a right to destroy that which threatens me with destruction; for by the fundamental law of Nature, man being to be preserved as much as possible, when all cannot be preserved, the safety of the innocent is to be preferred, and one may destroy a man who makes war upon him, or has discovered an enmity to his being, for the same reason that he may kill a wolf or a lion, because they are not under the ties of the common law of reason, have no other rule but that of force and violence, and so may be treated as a beast of prey, those dangerous and noxious creatures that will be sure to destroy him whenever he falls into their power.
17. And hence it is that he who attempts to get another man into his absolute power does thereby put himself into a state of war with him; it being to be understood as a declaration of a design upon his life. For I have reason to conclude that he who would get me into his power without my consent would use me as he pleased when he had got me there, and destroy me too when he had a fancy to it; for nobody can desire to have me in his absolute power unless it be to compel me by force to that which is against the right of my freedom- i.e. make me a slave..."
Of the State of War
- John Locke (1632-1704)And it follows, that one of two circumstances will always then arise, as a consequence of 'the moslem' coming into conflict with others [around him];Either;
1/ 'The moslem' is able to remain rampant and strong. In that circumstance 'the moslem' will establish a regime where he and his 'brothers' will commit
'righteous' atrocities against his weaker/defeated enemy.
[e.g. Koran 9.29]
OR,
2/ If in the course of his conflict [against his enemy], the moslem becomes militarily weaker, the moslem recognises that he needs to flee from his enemy! And the now weakened and routed moslem [and all of his fellow 'brothers'] will flee the war zone. And the now weakened and routed moslem will now claim that he/she and his/her family are the innocent victims, of others aggression, violence and atrocities.