Australian Politics Forum

Lisa Jones

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 39047
Sydney
Gender: female

Re: Julie Bishop
Reply #60 - Oct 1^st, 2015 at 12:21pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 1^st, 2015 at 12:06pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 1^st, 2015 at 11:12am:

aussie100percent wrote on Oct 1^st, 2015 at 10:18am:

Bam wrote on Oct 1^st, 2015 at 10:06am:

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 1^st, 2015 at 9:52am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 1^st, 2015 at 9:24am:

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 1^st, 2015 at 8:10am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 1^st, 2015 at 7:04am:

cods wrote on Sep 30^th, 2015 at 7:21pm:

oh just another DOOM AND GLOOM get the BITCH MISOGYNIST thread.. by the usual suspects..

Nothing to do with misogyny.

She's a low life human being.

Her gender is completely irrelevant.

Yes it IS relevant.

And it IS relevant ONLY to YOU.

Incorrect.

Stop being such a sexist.

She's being criticised as a human being, not as a woman.

No matter what genitalia she may (or may not) have, she is a nasty piece of work.

' Lawyer Peter Gordon told Australian Doctor magazine in 2007: "We had to fight even for the right of dying cancer victims to get a speedy trial. I recall sitting in the WA Supreme Court in an interlocutory hearing for the test cases involving Wittenoom miners Mr Peter Heys and Mr Tim Barrow. CSR was represented by Ms Julie Bishop (then Julie Gillon). (She) was rhetorically asking the court why workers should be entitled to jump court queues just because they were dying." '

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/opinion/julie-bishops-time-as-a-solicitor-...

What a horrid human being.

No. Not only are YOU being sexist...you're ALSO passively aggressively hiding it behind gender neutral language.

I am having some trouble finding these allegedly sexist remarks. Please highlight them.

Post #15 #31 to start num nuts Angry

No let him figure it out himself.

It will give him something to do for the day.

Those aren't my posts, Lisa.

So, please explain how I was being sexist.

I couldn't care less if they were/weren't your posts.

My post to someone else was to give YOU the task of going back to look for your sexism filled posts and not to spoon feed you.

You need to do something useful today.

Conduct some research. Research your posts.

Off you go.

Back to top

If I let myself be bought then I am no longer free.

HYPATIA - Greek philosopher, mathematician and astronomer (370 - 415)

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 139947
Gender: male

Re: Julie Bishop
Reply #61 - Oct 1^st, 2015 at 12:28pm

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 1^st, 2015 at 12:21pm:

You need to do something useful today.

You need to stop telling lies, Lisa.

None of my posts in this thread have been sexist.

Moreover, you know it and that's why you're lashing out at others. You've been caught out.

Quote:

"Her gender is completely irrelevant."

"She's being criticised as a human being, not as a woman."

"Her gender has absolutely nothing to do with the criticism she is receiving in here."

My conscience is clear.

Yours is as clouded as a cold winter's day, Lisa.

Back to top

IP Logged

Lisa Jones Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 39047 Sydney Gender:	Re: Julie Bishop Reply #62 - Oct 1^st, 2015 at 12:40pm No Greg. Not only are YOU being sexist...you're ALSO passively aggressively hiding it behind gender neutral language. And in addition to that, you're also in denial. It's time to get help Greg.
Back to top	If I let myself be bought then I am no longer free. HYPATIA - Greek philosopher, mathematician and astronomer (370 - 415) IP Logged

Jovial Monk Gold Member Offline Dogs not cats! Posts: 47929 Gender:	Re: Julie Bishop Reply #63 - Oct 1^st, 2015 at 12:41pm Yes, Lisa, you do need help.
Back to top	Get the vaxx! 💉💉 If you don’t like abortions ignore them like you do school shootings. IP Logged

greggerypeccary Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 139947 Gender:	Re: Julie Bishop Reply #64 - Oct 1^st, 2015 at 12:47pm Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 1^st, 2015 at 12:40pm: No Greg. Not only are YOU being sexist... You've been caught out telling lies, Lisa (and you don't like it). There are no sexist comments in here from me. Quite the opposite, in fact. The game's up, Lisa.
Back to top	IP Logged

Lisa Jones

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 39047
Sydney
Gender: female

Re: Julie Bishop
Reply #65 - Oct 1^st, 2015 at 12:50pm

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 1^st, 2015 at 12:40pm:

No Greg. Not only are YOU being sexist...you're ALSO passively aggressively hiding it behind gender neutral language.

And in addition to that, you're also in denial.

It's time to get help Greg.

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 1^st, 2015 at 12:47pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 1^st, 2015 at 12:40pm:

No Greg. Not only are YOU being sexist...

You've been caught out telling lies, Lisa (and you don't like it).

There are no sexist comments in here from me.

Quite the opposite, in fact.

The game's up, Lisa.

And now you're attempting to minimalize and trivialize the issue by misquoting me AND accusing me falsely.

I don't like that.

So please don't do it again. Ok?

Oh and it may be a game for you but it's not a game for me Greg. I take sexism quite seriously.

Back to top

« Last Edit: Oct 1^st, 2015 at 12:55pm by Lisa Jones »

If I let myself be bought then I am no longer free.

HYPATIA - Greek philosopher, mathematician and astronomer (370 - 415)

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 139947
Gender: male

Re: Julie Bishop
Reply #66 - Oct 1^st, 2015 at 12:57pm

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 1^st, 2015 at 12:50pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 1^st, 2015 at 12:40pm:

No Greg. Not only are YOU being sexist...you're ALSO passively aggressively hiding it behind gender neutral language.

And in addition to that, you're also in denial.

It's time to get help Greg.

And now you're attempting to minimalize and trivialize the issue by misquoting me AND accusing me falsely.

You told a lie, Lisa.

I'm not being sexist at all.

The game's up, Lisa.

Bishop is being criticised for being an abhorrent human being.

Her gender is completely irrelevant.

You need to remember that (and stop telling lies).

"Julie Bishop ... was rhetorically asking the court why workers should be entitled to jump court queues just because they were dying."

What a grub.

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 139947 Gender:	Re: Julie Bishop Reply #67 - Oct 1^st, 2015 at 1:04pm What a despicable human being Bishop is.
Back to top	IP Logged

mariacostel

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 7344
Sydney
Gender: female

Re: Julie Bishop
Reply #68 - Oct 1^st, 2015 at 4:44pm

Bam wrote on Oct 1^st, 2015 at 10:06am:

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 1^st, 2015 at 9:52am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 1^st, 2015 at 9:24am:

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 1^st, 2015 at 8:10am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 1^st, 2015 at 7:04am:

cods wrote on Sep 30^th, 2015 at 7:21pm:

oh just another DOOM AND GLOOM get the BITCH MISOGYNIST thread.. by the usual suspects..

Nothing to do with misogyny.

She's a low life human being.

Her gender is completely irrelevant.

Yes it IS relevant.

And it IS relevant ONLY to YOU.

Incorrect.

Stop being such a sexist.

She's being criticised as a human being, not as a woman.

No matter what genitalia she may (or may not) have, she is a nasty piece of work.

' Lawyer Peter Gordon told Australian Doctor magazine in 2007: "We had to fight even for the right of dying cancer victims to get a speedy trial. I recall sitting in the WA Supreme Court in an interlocutory hearing for the test cases involving Wittenoom miners Mr Peter Heys and Mr Tim Barrow. CSR was represented by Ms Julie Bishop (then Julie Gillon). (She) was rhetorically asking the court why workers should be entitled to jump court queues just because they were dying." '

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/opinion/julie-bishops-time-as-a-solicitor-...

What a horrid human being.

No. Not only are YOU being sexist...you're ALSO passively aggressively hiding it behind gender neutral language.

I am having some trouble finding these allegedly sexist remarks. Please highlight them.

We could always simple adopt the "Gillard Method" and simply state that someone is sexist and believe that the only justification required is the claim itself.

PS Gillard later stated that Abbott wasn't sexist at all. She was referring to 'men in general'. Such class!

Back to top

IP Logged

mariacostel

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 7344
Sydney
Gender: female

Re: Julie Bishop
Reply #69 - Oct 1^st, 2015 at 4:45pm

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 1^st, 2015 at 10:23am:

mariacostel wrote on Oct 1^st, 2015 at 10:03am:

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 1^st, 2015 at 9:52am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 1^st, 2015 at 9:24am:

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 1^st, 2015 at 8:10am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 1^st, 2015 at 7:04am:

cods wrote on Sep 30^th, 2015 at 7:21pm:

oh just another DOOM AND GLOOM get the BITCH MISOGYNIST thread.. by the usual suspects..

Nothing to do with misogyny.

She's a low life human being.

Her gender is completely irrelevant.

Yes it IS relevant.

And it IS relevant ONLY to YOU.

Incorrect.

Stop being such a sexist.

She's being criticised as a human being, not as a woman.

No matter what genitalia she may (or may not) have, she is a nasty piece of work.

' Lawyer Peter Gordon told Australian Doctor magazine in 2007: "We had to fight even for the right of dying cancer victims to get a speedy trial. I recall sitting in the WA Supreme Court in an interlocutory hearing for the test cases involving Wittenoom miners Mr Peter Heys and Mr Tim Barrow. CSR was represented by Ms Julie Bishop (then Julie Gillon). (She) was rhetorically asking the court why workers should be entitled to jump court queues just because they were dying." '

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/opinion/julie-bishops-time-as-a-solicitor-...

What a horrid human being.

No. Not only are YOU being sexist...you're ALSO passively aggressively hiding it behind gender neutral language.

Well said. I would guess that you Lisa would have experienced - as I have - the fear and hatred of powerful and successful women by some men - almost entirely under achievers.

Yep!

Under achievers with small pippies.

And don't laugh. I'm being serious here.

I never confirmed that! I have always suspected that 'small man syndrome' was not completely about height!

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 139947 Gender:	Re: Julie Bishop Reply #70 - Oct 1^st, 2015 at 6:54pm mariacostel wrote on Oct 1^st, 2015 at 4:44pm: We could always simple adopt the "Gillard Method" and simply *state* that someone is sexist and believe that the only justification required is the claim itself. You're too modest. That's the 'Longy Method'.
Back to top	IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded Gold Member Offline MediocrityNET: because people died for this! Posts: 26966	Re: Julie Bishop Reply #71 - Oct 1^st, 2015 at 7:05pm Julie Bishop is as bad as any man that did what she did
Back to top	Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) IP Logged

Grappler Deep State Feller Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 85507 Always was always will be HOME Gender:	Re: Julie Bishop Reply #72 - Oct 1^st, 2015 at 7:24pm Befehlen ist befehlen - she was just doing her job...........
Back to top	“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.” ― John Adams IP Logged

Grappler Deep State Feller

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 85507
Always was always will be HOME
Gender: male

Re: Julie Bishop
Reply #73 - Oct 1^st, 2015 at 7:27pm

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 1^st, 2015 at 10:23am:

mariacostel wrote on Oct 1^st, 2015 at 10:03am:

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 1^st, 2015 at 9:52am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 1^st, 2015 at 9:24am:

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 1^st, 2015 at 8:10am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 1^st, 2015 at 7:04am:

cods wrote on Sep 30^th, 2015 at 7:21pm:

oh just another DOOM AND GLOOM get the BITCH MISOGYNIST thread.. by the usual suspects..

Nothing to do with misogyny.

She's a low life human being.

Her gender is completely irrelevant.

Yes it IS relevant.

And it IS relevant ONLY to YOU.

Incorrect.

Stop being such a sexist.

She's being criticised as a human being, not as a woman.

No matter what genitalia she may (or may not) have, she is a nasty piece of work.

' Lawyer Peter Gordon told Australian Doctor magazine in 2007: "We had to fight even for the right of dying cancer victims to get a speedy trial. I recall sitting in the WA Supreme Court in an interlocutory hearing for the test cases involving Wittenoom miners Mr Peter Heys and Mr Tim Barrow. CSR was represented by Ms Julie Bishop (then Julie Gillon). (She) was rhetorically asking the court why workers should be entitled to jump court queues just because they were dying." '

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/opinion/julie-bishops-time-as-a-solicitor-...

What a horrid human being.

No. Not only are YOU being sexist...you're ALSO passively aggressively hiding it behind gender neutral language.

Well said. I would guess that you Lisa would have experienced - as I have - the fear and hatred of powerful and successful women by some men - almost entirely under achievers.

Yep!

Under achievers with small pippies.

And don't laugh. I'm being serious here.

*cowers down* .. you really have no idea how hard it is going through life with an 8/1'2" and big around pippy.... it's not funny at all.... all the big guys never stop laughing... Wink

Back to top

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams

IP Logged

Bam

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 21905
Gender: male

Re: Julie Bishop
Reply #74 - Oct 1^st, 2015 at 10:59pm

mariacostel wrote on Oct 1^st, 2015 at 4:44pm:

Bam wrote on Oct 1^st, 2015 at 10:06am:

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 1^st, 2015 at 9:52am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 1^st, 2015 at 9:24am:

Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 1^st, 2015 at 8:10am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 1^st, 2015 at 7:04am:

cods wrote on Sep 30^th, 2015 at 7:21pm:

oh just another DOOM AND GLOOM get the BITCH MISOGYNIST thread.. by the usual suspects..

Nothing to do with misogyny.

She's a low life human being.

Her gender is completely irrelevant.

Yes it IS relevant.

And it IS relevant ONLY to YOU.

Incorrect.

Stop being such a sexist.

She's being criticised as a human being, not as a woman.

No matter what genitalia she may (or may not) have, she is a nasty piece of work.

' Lawyer Peter Gordon told Australian Doctor magazine in 2007: "We had to fight even for the right of dying cancer victims to get a speedy trial. I recall sitting in the WA Supreme Court in an interlocutory hearing for the test cases involving Wittenoom miners Mr Peter Heys and Mr Tim Barrow. CSR was represented by Ms Julie Bishop (then Julie Gillon). (She) was rhetorically asking the court why workers should be entitled to jump court queues just because they were dying." '

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/opinion/julie-bishops-time-as-a-solicitor-...

What a horrid human being.

No. Not only are YOU being sexist...you're ALSO passively aggressively hiding it behind gender neutral language.

I am having some trouble finding these allegedly sexist remarks. Please highlight them.

We could always simple adopt the "Gillard Method" and simply state that someone is sexist and believe that the only justification required is the claim itself.

PS Gillard later stated that Abbott wasn't sexist at all. She was referring to 'men in general'. Such class!

The difference here is that Gillard gave examples.

All we've had from the one playing the "sexism" card is unfounded statements, personal attacks and fallacious crap (if you want proof, you look for it Angry

... really?) and no proof of any kind. It's not as if the evidential bar was set very high.

Back to top

You are not entitled to your opinion. You are only entitled to hold opinions that you can defend through sound, reasoned argument.

IP Logged