mariacostel wrote on Oct 2
nd, 2015 at 4:04pm:
This is hardly an elevated platform for discussion so some of the rules need a bit more leeway.
That seems to say that we can set our personal standards based on, the "platform" we are using and, seemingly at least, the actions of others...
Interesting way to set personal standards...
Because...
mariacostel wrote on Oct 2
nd, 2015 at 4:04pm:
It is abuse to target the person, but even then when someone says something manifestly idiotic, to say that it is so, is not abuse.
mariacostel wrote on Oct 2
nd, 2015 at 4:04pm:
at what point does calling them an idiot cease to be abusive
Depending on one's "personal standards" I suppose, but it would seemingly and reasonably be
at no pointmariacostel wrote on Oct 2
nd, 2015 at 4:04pm:
In an environment such as this one it can be very challenging when presented with opponent who reject any and all evidence put to them from indisputable sources.
Yep, I know what you're saying there, however, it seems that is something that we are ALL capable of doing. Demonstrably so on this platform.
I don't disagree with you that when people disagree with us it is frustrating.
I also agree that, at times that disagreement, even at our most tolerant and patient seems illogical and unreasonable in the face of facts... I am not convinced that there is such a thing as irrefutable evidence in forumite world (oh, I realise there is in the rest of the real world though...), perhaps it is slightly flawed thinking to consider evidence as irrefutable on a forum. Some people come here to oppose it would seem.
That opposition though, albeit at times unreasonable and ill conceived is not a given to either be abuse or justification for being abusive, is it?