Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6
Send Topic Print
Libs + Gun Lobby = Gun Deaths On Syd Streets (Read 6274 times)
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: Libs + Gun Lobby = Gun Deaths On Syd Streets
Reply #30 - Oct 2nd, 2015 at 7:44pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 2nd, 2015 at 7:43pm:
polite_gandalf wrote on Oct 2nd, 2015 at 7:41pm:
Islam presumably... or it could be communism, jedi or the liberal party...

regardless - as long as its "politically motivated" it counts as terrorism.


Absolutely.

However, doubleplus can't tell us what group, movement, or ideology it was done in support of.


Well its pretty obvious he has one in mind.
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
double plus good
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 5693
Gender: male
Re: Libs + Gun Lobby = Gun Deaths On Syd Streets
Reply #31 - Oct 2nd, 2015 at 7:45pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 2nd, 2015 at 7:41pm:
double plus good wrote on Oct 2nd, 2015 at 7:39pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 2nd, 2015 at 7:38pm:
double plus good wrote on Oct 2nd, 2015 at 7:35pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 2nd, 2015 at 7:32pm:
double plus good wrote on Oct 2nd, 2015 at 7:30pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 2nd, 2015 at 7:29pm:
double plus good wrote on Oct 2nd, 2015 at 7:28pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 2nd, 2015 at 7:27pm:
double plus good wrote on Oct 2nd, 2015 at 7:26pm:
polite_gandalf wrote on Oct 2nd, 2015 at 7:24pm:
ABC originally reported the two dead were police. Now its pretty obvious the only ones killed were the attackers.
One terrorist and one bystander who was executed randomly  by the shooter.


What terrorist organisation was he from?

take a guess.


IRA?

KKK?

If not those, then which one?

Can you please enlighten us?

be serious.


I am.

You're calling it a terrorist attack, and yet you can't say what organisation the "terrorist" was representing.

What makes you think it's a terrorist attack, and what group do you think is involved?

A terrorist attack is a terrorist attack. A man that posts a pipe bomb can be a terrorist. It doesn't have to be a terrorist organisation numpty. Attacking  police headquarters with guns is a terrorist attack.


What makes you think it's a terrorist attack, and what group, movement, or ideology was it done in support of?
I told you why it's a terrorist attack. Why does the group matter??


What makes you think it's a terrorist attack, and what group, movement, or ideology was it done in support of?
So attacking the headquarters for police in Sydney isn't terrorism? In time all will be revealed pecca. Be patient.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
double plus good
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 5693
Gender: male
Re: Libs + Gun Lobby = Gun Deaths On Syd Streets
Reply #32 - Oct 2nd, 2015 at 7:46pm
 
polite_gandalf wrote on Oct 2nd, 2015 at 7:44pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 2nd, 2015 at 7:43pm:
polite_gandalf wrote on Oct 2nd, 2015 at 7:41pm:
Islam presumably... or it could be communism, jedi or the liberal party...

regardless - as long as its "politically motivated" it counts as terrorism.


Absolutely.

However, doubleplus can't tell us what group, movement, or ideology it was done in support of.


Well its pretty obvious he has one in mind.
I'm not sure. But black robes are worn by ISIS so it's a good chance. But we don't know yet. Don't you agree?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Secret Wars
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3928
Gender: male
Re: Libs + Gun Lobby = Gun Deaths On Syd Streets
Reply #33 - Oct 2nd, 2015 at 7:47pm
 
polite_gandalf wrote on Oct 2nd, 2015 at 7:41pm:
Islam presumably... or it could be communism, jedi or the liberal party...

regardless - as long as its "politically motivated" it counts as terrorism. Which is why Man Horan Monis wasn't a terrorist - because it was a deliberate suicide mission to avoid going to gaol over the murder of his wife.


Rigggggthhhhtttt, so not islamic terrorism, just inspired by islamic terrorism.  A distinction without a difference.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 139651
Gender: male
Re: Libs + Gun Lobby = Gun Deaths On Syd Streets
Reply #34 - Oct 2nd, 2015 at 7:47pm
 
double plus good wrote on Oct 2nd, 2015 at 7:45pm:
In time all will be revealed pecca. Be patient.


Ah.

So you're just guessing.

If you're correct, what group, movement, or ideology was it done in support of?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: Libs + Gun Lobby = Gun Deaths On Syd Streets
Reply #35 - Oct 2nd, 2015 at 7:52pm
 
double plus good wrote on Oct 2nd, 2015 at 7:46pm:
polite_gandalf wrote on Oct 2nd, 2015 at 7:44pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 2nd, 2015 at 7:43pm:
polite_gandalf wrote on Oct 2nd, 2015 at 7:41pm:
Islam presumably... or it could be communism, jedi or the liberal party...

regardless - as long as its "politically motivated" it counts as terrorism.


Absolutely.

However, doubleplus can't tell us what group, movement, or ideology it was done in support of.


Well its pretty obvious he has one in mind.
I'm not sure. But black robes are worn by ISIS so it's a good chance. But we don't know yet. Don't you agree?


Are you saying the shooter was wearing black robes? Do you know something no one else does homo?
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
double plus good
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 5693
Gender: male
Re: Libs + Gun Lobby = Gun Deaths On Syd Streets
Reply #36 - Oct 2nd, 2015 at 7:54pm
 
polite_gandalf wrote on Oct 2nd, 2015 at 7:52pm:
double plus good wrote on Oct 2nd, 2015 at 7:46pm:
polite_gandalf wrote on Oct 2nd, 2015 at 7:44pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 2nd, 2015 at 7:43pm:
polite_gandalf wrote on Oct 2nd, 2015 at 7:41pm:
Islam presumably... or it could be communism, jedi or the liberal party...

regardless - as long as its "politically motivated" it counts as terrorism.


Absolutely.

However, doubleplus can't tell us what group, movement, or ideology it was done in support of.


Well its pretty obvious he has one in mind.
I'm not sure. But black robes are worn by ISIS so it's a good chance. But we don't know yet. Don't you agree?


Are you saying the shooter was wearing black robes? Do you know something no one else does homo?
That's what the media is reporting. You would know too if you did some reading.

The gunman, who was wearing black robes, stormed the Charles Street building about 4.30pm, firing multiple shots as he approached.
Read more at http://www.9news.com.au/national/2015/10/02/17/01/two-feared-shot-in-parramatta-in-sydney-s-west#lT6O5uQFFqUDHQfQ.99
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 139651
Gender: male
Re: Libs + Gun Lobby = Gun Deaths On Syd Streets
Reply #37 - Oct 2nd, 2015 at 7:57pm
 
...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
double plus good
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 5693
Gender: male
Re: Libs + Gun Lobby = Gun Deaths On Syd Streets
Reply #38 - Oct 2nd, 2015 at 8:04pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 2nd, 2015 at 7:57pm:

The only thing that snifter in the photo would be guilty of is stockpiling kiddie porn. The sheila would be that she is sexless.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: Libs + Gun Lobby = Gun Deaths On Syd Streets
Reply #39 - Oct 2nd, 2015 at 8:04pm
 
double plus good wrote on Oct 2nd, 2015 at 7:54pm:
polite_gandalf wrote on Oct 2nd, 2015 at 7:52pm:
double plus good wrote on Oct 2nd, 2015 at 7:46pm:
polite_gandalf wrote on Oct 2nd, 2015 at 7:44pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 2nd, 2015 at 7:43pm:
polite_gandalf wrote on Oct 2nd, 2015 at 7:41pm:
Islam presumably... or it could be communism, jedi or the liberal party...

regardless - as long as its "politically motivated" it counts as terrorism.


Absolutely.

However, doubleplus can't tell us what group, movement, or ideology it was done in support of.


Well its pretty obvious he has one in mind.
I'm not sure. But black robes are worn by ISIS so it's a good chance. But we don't know yet. Don't you agree?


Are you saying the shooter was wearing black robes? Do you know something no one else does homo?
That's what the media is reporting. You would know too if you did some reading.

The gunman, who was wearing black robes, stormed the Charles Street building about 4.30pm, firing multiple shots as he approached.
Read more at http://www.9news.com.au/national/2015/10/02/17/01/two-feared-shot-in-parramatta-in-sydney-s-west#lT6O5uQFFqUDHQfQ.99


Fair enough.

Still, from the same article....

Quote:
Police said they are yet to identify either of the gunman.
Read more at http://www.9news.com.au/national/2015/10/02/17/01/two-feared-shot-in-parramatta-in-sydney-s-west#oQvpAIThFBZ44qff.99


'either of the gunman' - is obviously gramatically incorrect, and could be disregarded as a typo - *BUT* - it doesn't help that earlier reports said that there were 2 gunmen. All this information is coming from witnesses, since the police are staying mum. So if witnesses are wrong about there being 2 gunmen, perhaps we should take the claim about a "black robed" gunman with a grain of salt until we get official confirmation.
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
double plus good
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 5693
Gender: male
Re: Libs + Gun Lobby = Gun Deaths On Syd Streets
Reply #40 - Oct 2nd, 2015 at 8:07pm
 
polite_gandalf wrote on Oct 2nd, 2015 at 8:04pm:
double plus good wrote on Oct 2nd, 2015 at 7:54pm:
polite_gandalf wrote on Oct 2nd, 2015 at 7:52pm:
double plus good wrote on Oct 2nd, 2015 at 7:46pm:
polite_gandalf wrote on Oct 2nd, 2015 at 7:44pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 2nd, 2015 at 7:43pm:
polite_gandalf wrote on Oct 2nd, 2015 at 7:41pm:
Islam presumably... or it could be communism, jedi or the liberal party...

regardless - as long as its "politically motivated" it counts as terrorism.


Absolutely.

However, doubleplus can't tell us what group, movement, or ideology it was done in support of.


Well its pretty obvious he has one in mind.
I'm not sure. But black robes are worn by ISIS so it's a good chance. But we don't know yet. Don't you agree?


Are you saying the shooter was wearing black robes? Do you know something no one else does homo?
That's what the media is reporting. You would know too if you did some reading.

The gunman, who was wearing black robes, stormed the Charles Street building about 4.30pm, firing multiple shots as he approached.
Read more at http://www.9news.com.au/national/2015/10/02/17/01/two-feared-shot-in-parramatta-in-sydney-s-west#lT6O5uQFFqUDHQfQ.99


Fair enough.

Still, from the same article....

Quote:
Police said they are yet to identify either of the gunman.
Read more at http://www.9news.com.au/national/2015/10/02/17/01/two-feared-shot-in-parramatta-in-sydney-s-west#oQvpAIThFBZ44qff.99


'either of the gunman' - is obviously gramatically incorrect, and could be disregarded as a typo - *BUT* - it doesn't help that earlier reports said that there were 2 gunmen. All this information is coming from witnesses, since the police are staying mum. So if witnesses are wrong about there being 2 gunmen, perhaps we should take the claim about a "black robed" gunman with a grain of salt until we get official confirmation.
I'm just going on what the media is reporting. That's what we all do.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 139651
Gender: male
Re: Libs + Gun Lobby = Gun Deaths On Syd Streets
Reply #41 - Oct 2nd, 2015 at 8:09pm
 
double plus good wrote on Oct 2nd, 2015 at 8:07pm:
I'm just going on what the media is reporting. That's what we all do.


Which media organisation said it was a terrorist attack?

We can rule out the ABC: "The ABC understands the incident is not terror related."

So ... ?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: Libs + Gun Lobby = Gun Deaths On Syd Streets
Reply #42 - Oct 2nd, 2015 at 8:13pm
 
homo is only going by what the media report. The media reports that

Quote:
There is no confirmation the incident was a terrorist attack
Read more at http://www.9news.com.au/national/2015/10/02/17/01/two-feared-shot-in-parramatta-in-sydney-s-west#oQvpAIThFBZ44qff.99


and

Quote:
The ABC understands the incident is not terror related.


Regardless, Homo concludes that its terror related. But he is just going by what the media report  Cheesy
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 139651
Gender: male
Re: Libs + Gun Lobby = Gun Deaths On Syd Streets
Reply #43 - Oct 2nd, 2015 at 8:14pm
 

Which media organisation said it was a terrorist attack, doubleplusgoo?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
double plus good
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 5693
Gender: male
Re: Libs + Gun Lobby = Gun Deaths On Syd Streets
Reply #44 - Oct 2nd, 2015 at 8:18pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 2nd, 2015 at 8:09pm:
double plus good wrote on Oct 2nd, 2015 at 8:07pm:
I'm just going on what the media is reporting. That's what we all do.


Which media organisation said it was a terrorist attack?

We can rule out the ABC: "The ABC understands the incident is not terror related."

So ... ?
Which organisation said it wasn't? I don't pay any attention to the stupid ABC. We were talking about robes pecca.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6
Send Topic Print