Yes it quite clearly is.
Well don't just sit there.
Yet another assumption.
clarify your point.
Actually I already did...
Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 5
th, 2015 at 8:51am:
No it's not actually.
Yes, it absolutely is...
Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 5
th, 2015 at 8:18am:
"The smart money would be on banning ALL organised religion." Phemanderac
"Only a fool would suggest banning all religions because of one militant ideological one" Lisa
There is my original comment in full and your response in full...
Your assumption was that I my statement was motivated by the actions of "one militant ideological one".No matter how you want to reframe what YOU said, that is an assumption on what MY thinking was... In short, you are directly claiming some insider knowledge about my thinking, you are wrong.
I tell you that is not what motivated my comment, you tell me that is not the case....
Your assumption was in error, yet, you blatantly try to ignore that FACT.
I am ok with you disagreeing with my comment, but, I am not ok with you making ridiculous assumptions about my motivation.
Lisa Jones wrote on Oct 5
th, 2015 at 8:51am:
Now bugger off.
I don't think the abuse is necessary, however, if you do please understand this. Any rational, thinking person will immediately note that comments like this diminish any relevance or validity in that which you have said. Now since you are starting from a position of erroneous assumption it would seem counter productive to your position to further diminish it.
Please refrain.
By all means, argue your case, but deal with the facts.
I stand by my comment, this is not he first time I have stated my opposition to ALL organised religions. Which further highlights the error in YOUR ASSUMPTION.
One edit to clarify who said what in quoted section...
That is pretty clear and it was only on the previous page...
Please try to keep up of you are going to buy into this stuff...