ImSpartacus2 wrote on Oct 8
th, 2015 at 10:45pm:
This is what actually happened as reported by wikipedia, instead of your denialist websites;
Gee, he was cleared by his own team. Not a formal investigation. I mean you can't get better than that can you?
'The Pacific Institute indicated in the statement that it had found no evidence for Heartland's charges that Gleick had forged one of several documents he released last February.
But the Institute offered no further information on the findings of the investigation, or any evidence to support the claim of having conducted a fully independent investigation. It gave no further explanation for its decision to reject Heartland's charges that Gleick had faked a document.'
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2012/jun/07/peter-gleick-reinstated-heart...'Gleick also admitted to lying about the nature of one document he originally claimed had come from Heartland, a ‘strategy memo’ that purported to describe Heartland’s plans to address climate change in the coming year.
That document was quickly shown to be a fake, written to misrepresent and defame The Heartland Institute. Gleick denied he was the author of the fake memo.'
https://www.heartland.org/press-releases/2013/02/14/why-isnt-pacific-institutes-...What a prince, he claims he wasn't the author, but he had already admitted there was no insider, that it was actually he, who took documents.
Forensic study into the fake memo -
'The lead analysis was conducted by Patrick Juola, Ph.D., Director of Research, and director of the Evaluating Variations in Language Laboratory at Duquesne University in Pittsburgh. Juola & Associates, headed by President Patrick Brennan is a separate commercial entity that provides analysis and consultation on stylometry.
Dr. Juola has published his analysis of the “Climate Strategy Memo,” which I present first and in entirety here at WUWT.
First, the short read:
Stylometric Report – Heartland Institute Memo
Patrick Juola, Ph.D.
Summary
As an expert in computational and forensic linguistics, I have reviewed the alleged Heartland memo to determine who the primary author of the report is, and more speci fically whether the primary author was Peter Gleick or Joseph Bast. I conclude, based on a computational analysis, that the author is more likely to be Gleick than Bast.'
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/03/14/professional-forensic-stylometric-analysis...