Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Poll Poll
Question: gregg's disruptive behaviour should be stopped

Definitely 'Yes'    
  20 (55.6%)
Let him continue his trolling    
  4 (11.1%)
Definitey 'No'    
  12 (33.3%)




Total votes: 36
« Created by: Lord Herbert on: Oct 25th, 2015 at 7:55pm »

Pages: 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 ... 33
Send Topic Print
Should gregg's thread-vandalising be stopped? (Read 22434 times)
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 38862
Gender: male
Re: Should gregg's thread-vandalising be stopped?
Reply #135 - Oct 27th, 2015 at 1:05pm
 
Lord Herbert wrote on Oct 27th, 2015 at 11:49am:
Aussie wrote on Oct 27th, 2015 at 11:43am:
16-11 actually.  Herbert, ignore that Poll.  It is easily rigged, and has been.


That can work both ways if it's true.

17 to 11.

gregg should take the hint.


Herbert, those who have their wits about them know that the author of the Poll has the capacity to deliberately manipulate it.  I put my fancy Green Coat on to see whether people had been arriving here when the count changed, so I am well aware of how this is likely being manipulated.  It is the simple switch on and off of a button only the Thread/Poll creator has access to.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 96661
Re: Should gregg's thread-vandalising be stopped?
Reply #136 - Oct 27th, 2015 at 1:16pm
 
mantra wrote on Oct 27th, 2015 at 7:26am:
Dnarever wrote on Oct 27th, 2015 at 5:55am:
I don't have a problem with either Gregg or Herb and I don't see anything in this topic that will help them to play nice with each other.


Herbert is a quality poster


Herbie is an articulate poster. Quality, however, requires other human attributes. St Paul explains:

Quote:
1If I speak in the tongues[a] of men or of angels, but do not have love, I am only a resounding gong or a clanging cymbal. 2 If I have the gift of prophecy and can fathom all mysteries and all knowledge, and if I have a faith that can move mountains, but do not have love, I am nothing. 3 If I give all I possess to the poor and give over my body to hardship that I may boast,[b] but do not have love, I gain nothing.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Lord Herbert
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 34441
Gender: male
Re: Should gregg's thread-vandalising be stopped?
Reply #137 - Oct 27th, 2015 at 1:17pm
 
Aussie wrote on Oct 27th, 2015 at 1:05pm:
Lord Herbert wrote on Oct 27th, 2015 at 11:49am:
Aussie wrote on Oct 27th, 2015 at 11:43am:
16-11 actually.  Herbert, ignore that Poll.  It is easily rigged, and has been.


That can work both ways if it's true.

17 to 11.

gregg should take the hint.


Herbert, those who have their wits about them know that the author of the Poll has the capacity to deliberately manipulate it.  I put my fancy Green Coat on to see whether people had been arriving here when the count changed, so I am well aware of how this is likely being manipulated.  It is the simple switch on and off of a button only the Thread/Poll creator has access to.


Do tell. Where's this switch? You've got me intrigued.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Oct 27th, 2015 at 1:30pm by Lord Herbert »  
 
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 38862
Gender: male
Re: Should gregg's thread-vandalising be stopped?
Reply #138 - Oct 27th, 2015 at 1:21pm
 
Lord Herbert wrote on Oct 27th, 2015 at 1:17pm:
Aussie wrote on Oct 27th, 2015 at 1:05pm:
Lord Herbert wrote on Oct 27th, 2015 at 11:49am:
Aussie wrote on Oct 27th, 2015 at 11:43am:
16-11 actually.  Herbert, ignore that Poll.  It is easily rigged, and has been.


That can work both ways if it's true.

17 to 11.

gregg should take the hint.


Herbert, those who have their wits about them know that the author of the Poll has the capacity to deliberately manipulate it.  I put my fancy Green Coat on to see whether people had been arriving here when the count changed, so I am well aware of how this is likely being manipulated.  It is the simple switch on and off of a button only the Thread/Poll creator has access to.


Do tell. Where's the this switch? You've got me intrigued.


You know exactly where it is.  As the creator of the Thread, and The Poll, you've been switching it on and off as the anti Mr Peccary vote increases.  (Oh, the GMods can access it as well......and ~ only in their own patch ~ so can Mods like me (only here in Relationships) when I go all greenshit.)
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 96661
Re: Should gregg's thread-vandalising be stopped?
Reply #139 - Oct 27th, 2015 at 1:24pm
 
Lord Herbert wrote on Oct 27th, 2015 at 10:42am:
Jovial Monk wrote on Oct 26th, 2015 at 10:50pm:
White settlement thrived? Went through lots of ups and downs! The original settlement on the tank stream was almost evacuated!


Correct!

The thieving by the local Abos nearly starved-out the early settlers.


Here's another porkie spread by the master of porkies. No letters or reports describe rations being stolen by Abos to the extent that it starved out the colony. Crops failed. Sources of food were scarce. The arrival of the second fleet changed things.

This is the sort of rebuttal Herbie calls "white-anting". Greggery's tactics are far superior.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Panther
Gold Member
*****
Offline


My Heart beats True for
the Red White & Blue...

Posts: 11623
Gender: male
Re: Should gregg's thread-vandalising be stopped?
Reply #140 - Oct 27th, 2015 at 1:28pm
 
Aussie wrote on Oct 27th, 2015 at 12:04pm:
Lord Herbert wrote on Oct 27th, 2015 at 11:49am:
Aussie wrote on Oct 27th, 2015 at 11:43am:
16-11 actually.  Herbert, ignore that Poll.  It is easily rigged, and has been.


That can work both ways if it's true.

17 to 11.

gregg should take the hint.



....and do what?  Disappear?



Well, might I suggest, that if Greg, or anyone else for that matter, insists on being a repetitive & complete 'TROLL', then I would suggest that they lose their posting abilities for a period of say 25 posts.

During that period if they wish to post, their post(s) must be viewed & approved by a Moderator before it becomes posted on the thread(s) itself/themselves.

If any post, in the opinion of the moderator, is 'TROLLISH', then the period increases by 10 additional posts, & the offending post(s) is/are blocked, to never see the light of day.

Three (3) independent repeats of 'TROLLISH' behavior causes a complete & total ban.

If the poster on a posting probationary period successfully completes their probation, then moderation will no longer be necessary, unless the poster re-offends.
Back to top
 

"When the People fear government there is Tyranny;
When government fears the People there is Freedom & Liberty!"

'
Live FREE or DIE!
'
 
IP Logged
 
Jovial Monk
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Dogs not cats!

Posts: 47794
Gender: male
Re: Should gregg's thread-vandalising be stopped?
Reply #141 - Oct 27th, 2015 at 1:28pm
 
That is a racist comment, Herb.
Back to top
 

Get the vaxx! 💉💉

If you don’t like abortions ignore them like you do school shootings.
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 139675
Gender: male
Re: Should gregg's thread-vandalising be stopped?
Reply #142 - Oct 27th, 2015 at 1:30pm
 
Panther wrote on Oct 27th, 2015 at 1:28pm:
Aussie wrote on Oct 27th, 2015 at 12:04pm:
Lord Herbert wrote on Oct 27th, 2015 at 11:49am:
Aussie wrote on Oct 27th, 2015 at 11:43am:
16-11 actually.  Herbert, ignore that Poll.  It is easily rigged, and has been.


That can work both ways if it's true.

17 to 11.

gregg should take the hint.



....and do what?  Disappear?



Well, might I suggest, that if Greg, or anyone else for that matter, insists on being a repetitive & complete 'TROLL', then I would suggest that they lose their posting abilities for a period of say 25 posts.

During that period if they wish to post, their post(s) must be viewed & approved by a Moderator before it becomes posted on the thread(s) itself/themselves.

If any post, in the opinion of the moderator, is 'TROLLISH', then the period increases by 10 additional posts, & the offending post(s) is/are blocked, to never see the light of day.

Three (3) independent repeats of 'TROLLISH' behavior causes a complete & total ban.

If the poster on a posting probationary period successfully completes their probation, then moderation will no longer be necessary, unless the poster re-offends.



Herbie would receive an immediate ban.

He trolls like no other.

Troll: "One who posts a deliberately provocative message to a newsgroup or message board with the intention of causing maximum disruption and argument."

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Lord Herbert
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 34441
Gender: male
Re: Should gregg's thread-vandalising be stopped?
Reply #143 - Oct 27th, 2015 at 1:31pm
 
Aussie wrote on Oct 27th, 2015 at 1:21pm:
Lord Herbert wrote on Oct 27th, 2015 at 1:17pm:
Aussie wrote on Oct 27th, 2015 at 1:05pm:
Lord Herbert wrote on Oct 27th, 2015 at 11:49am:
Aussie wrote on Oct 27th, 2015 at 11:43am:
16-11 actually.  Herbert, ignore that Poll.  It is easily rigged, and has been.


That can work both ways if it's true.

17 to 11.

gregg should take the hint.


Herbert, those who have their wits about them know that the author of the Poll has the capacity to deliberately manipulate it.  I put my fancy Green Coat on to see whether people had been arriving here when the count changed, so I am well aware of how this is likely being manipulated.  It is the simple switch on and off of a button only the Thread/Poll creator has access to.


Do tell. Where's the this switch? You've got me intrigued.


You know exactly where it is.  As the creator of the Thread, and The Poll, you've been switching it on and off as the anti Mr Peccary vote increases.  (Oh, the GMods can access it as well......and ~ only in their own patch ~ so can Mods like me (only here in Relationships) when I go all greenshit.)


That's all news to me - as you well know.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 139675
Gender: male
Re: Should gregg's thread-vandalising be stopped?
Reply #144 - Oct 27th, 2015 at 1:49pm
 
Lord Herbert wrote on Oct 27th, 2015 at 1:31pm:
Aussie wrote on Oct 27th, 2015 at 1:21pm:
Lord Herbert wrote on Oct 27th, 2015 at 1:17pm:
Aussie wrote on Oct 27th, 2015 at 1:05pm:
Lord Herbert wrote on Oct 27th, 2015 at 11:49am:
Aussie wrote on Oct 27th, 2015 at 11:43am:
16-11 actually.  Herbert, ignore that Poll.  It is easily rigged, and has been.


That can work both ways if it's true.

17 to 11.

gregg should take the hint.


Herbert, those who have their wits about them know that the author of the Poll has the capacity to deliberately manipulate it.  I put my fancy Green Coat on to see whether people had been arriving here when the count changed, so I am well aware of how this is likely being manipulated.  It is the simple switch on and off of a button only the Thread/Poll creator has access to.


Do tell. Where's the this switch? You've got me intrigued.


You know exactly where it is.  As the creator of the Thread, and The Poll, you've been switching it on and off as the anti Mr Peccary vote increases.  (Oh, the GMods can access it as well......and ~ only in their own patch ~ so can Mods like me (only here in Relationships) when I go all greenshit.)


That's all news to me - as you well know.


Herbie ticks all the boxes.

  • Troll


  • Racist


  • Nasty


  • Liar



Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Lord Herbert
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 34441
Gender: male
Re: Should gregg's thread-vandalising be stopped?
Reply #145 - Oct 27th, 2015 at 1:55pm
 
This thread is working out quite well as a toilet for gregg to do his business in as an alternative to him being out there dropping his pants in the other threads.

Think of this as an open latrine especially dug for you, gregg.

Don't fall in, will you?

Some of the planks across the trench look a bit dodgy.



Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 139675
Gender: male
Re: Should gregg's thread-vandalising be stopped?
Reply #146 - Oct 27th, 2015 at 2:24pm
 
Lord Herbert wrote on Oct 27th, 2015 at 1:55pm:
This thread is working out quite well ...



... in reinforcing the fact that you're a nasty little troll.

Yes.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
mothra
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 35585
Gender: female
Re: Should gregg's thread-vandalising be stopped?
Reply #147 - Oct 27th, 2015 at 2:30pm
 
Lord Herbert wrote on Oct 27th, 2015 at 11:49am:
Aussie wrote on Oct 27th, 2015 at 11:43am:
16-11 actually.  Herbert, ignore that Poll.  It is easily rigged, and has been.


That can work both ways if it's true.

17 to 11.

gregg should take the hint.



I wonder how many socks voted.
Back to top
 

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.
 
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 38862
Gender: male
Re: Should gregg's thread-vandalising be stopped?
Reply #148 - Oct 27th, 2015 at 2:33pm
 
mothra wrote on Oct 27th, 2015 at 2:30pm:
Lord Herbert wrote on Oct 27th, 2015 at 11:49am:
Aussie wrote on Oct 27th, 2015 at 11:43am:
16-11 actually.  Herbert, ignore that Poll.  It is easily rigged, and has been.


That can work both ways if it's true.

17 to 11.

gregg should take the hint.



I wonder how many socks voted.


Socks are  not needed to corrupt a Poll, Mothra.  Test it for yourself by starting a test Thread...here if you want....add a Poll......and you will observe for yourself the array of buttons the author/creator has at their disposal.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
mothra
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 35585
Gender: female
Re: Should gregg's thread-vandalising be stopped?
Reply #149 - Oct 27th, 2015 at 2:38pm
 
Aussie wrote on Oct 27th, 2015 at 2:33pm:
mothra wrote on Oct 27th, 2015 at 2:30pm:
Lord Herbert wrote on Oct 27th, 2015 at 11:49am:
Aussie wrote on Oct 27th, 2015 at 11:43am:
16-11 actually.  Herbert, ignore that Poll.  It is easily rigged, and has been.


That can work both ways if it's true.

17 to 11.

gregg should take the hint.



I wonder how many socks voted.


Socks are  not needed to corrupt a Poll, Mothra.  Test it for yourself by starting a test Thread...here if you want....add a Poll......and you will observe for yourself the array of buttons the author/creator has at their disposal.


Interesting. I've always wondered if the polls were worth a damn.
Back to top
 

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 ... 33
Send Topic Print