Dnarever wrote on Oct 28^th, 2015 at 5:45am:


I didn't notice, but he has a voice here to protest his innocence if he's that distressed. He isn't defending himself though - he's focused only on abusing Herbert.

Does it matter if a member is racist? Surely those who claim the moral highground here by pretending they're not - could try to explain why the racist member is wrong, rather than just calling him/her names. Regardless of perfect spelling or grammar - anyone can be articulate if they make an effort, but these stalkers are too lazy and prefer to spout out abuse instead of giving a little thought to their responses.

Dnarever wrote on Oct 28^th, 2015 at 5:45am:


Please explain.

I've given him two options to vote against the proposition that his thread-vandalism should be stopped.

mantra wrote on Oct 28^th, 2015 at 5:11am:


You have completely misconstrued what Herbert is complaining about.  It is not whether I have backed him up etc tec.....it is that when he commences a Thread, Mr Peccary has the gall to comment in it, and comment in such a fashion Herbert does not approve of.  I will also comment, as I have on his Thread about that Ironwoman, a type of Thread Herbert has commenced many times before so he can rave on about non blue black Aboriginals.  As far as I am concerned, that is sheer crap, Mr Peccary correctly refers to it as racist crap....Herbert consider any comment like ours as graffiti.

On the Polls.....as the author of this Thread and creator of the Poll, Herbert has access to a button which allows absolute control over various things.  Test it for your self.  Start a Test Thread.  Add a Poll to it, and when you do that you will see the buttons I am talking about......you are smart enough to work it out.

You refer to my judgement.  I have no control over Herbert or Mr Peccary beyond the little I have here in Relationships, and it has never crossed my mind that I need to take any action whatsoever against either of them here.

Aussie wrote on Oct 28^th, 2015 at 9:39am:


That's not how it is at all - and you well know it.

My complaint is that he doesn't offer a view on the subject, but arrives within minutes to yet again troll, grafitti, and tag the thread using nothing but childish insults and abuse against me.

The problem is that he does this as a matter of routine and habitual practice, to the effect that threads soon degenerate into farce and the absurd.

Freediver told me there are no rules against someone irritating you.

I think there's a little more involved here than simply being irritated by someone.

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 28^th, 2015 at 9:57am:


Herbie knows that, though

Are you sure ?

that's why they call him the Troll King.

This isn't needed with Herb and if you left it out your post would be stronger and Herb would have nothing to complain about.

The top line of your post was very strong - this last comment undermined it completely.

I know I do the same thing to myself often enough.

Nobody calls Herb the troll king - he wouldn't be in the top 20

Dnarever wrote on Oct 28^th, 2015 at 10:10am:


Herbie is a troll.

The only reason he is here, is to troll.

You, and many others, have been sucked in by one of the biggest trolls on the internet, and he's laughing at every single one of you.

This isn't personal opinion, or unwarranted criticism - it is a simple statement of fact.

Troll: "One who posts a deliberately provocative message to a newsgroup or message board with the intention of causing maximum disruption and argument"

Now, watch him play the victim.

issuevoter wrote on Oct 28^th, 2015 at 1:03pm:


I don't mind gregg disagreeing with me on every single issue - but he should state his case instead of offering nothing more than juvenile graffiti and tagging in the threads.

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 28^th, 2015 at 10:29am:


There we go:  http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1445766789/223#223