Jovial Monk wrote on Nov 2
nd, 2015 at 6:42am:
Some unemployed own houses, Scoot. Been kicked in the head by a hobby horse again? Obviously they don’t own busineses or farms anymore. Hmmm wait a minute, lots of farmers get the dole even when they still have the farm!
The rest of your post is too turgid to derive sense from it—assuming it has sense in the first place, not likely with your posts.
Not many, anything over 5 acres counts towards the asset test.
You and the pansi and most of the lefties just misrepresent the unemployed .
It is YOU who lives in fantasy land.
The local abbatoir (theiss brothers) on the outskirts of brisbane has nearly 200 457 visa holders working in its meatworks. they built a complex to house all the workers in logan city (which has the highest unemployment in Qld).
they were allowed to import these 457 visa holders after months of trying to fill the job vacancies locally.
the pay rate starts at $26 an hour.
sure we have 5 % unemployment, thats 1 in 20.
think back to when you were in the classroom.
are you honestly telling me that in a class of 20 kids there wasnt 1 bludger.
If so, i will have to giggle at this ludicrous suggestion.
sure if we had 20 % unemployment, there would be some people caught up in the unemployed, but 1 in 20 people are slackers .
and it is a good thing we make being a slacker as unattractive as possible.
as for this idea that , getting taxpayer money (and more of it) so you can just go shopping and "contribute" to society by being a "consumer"
that is laughable.
try selling that to the 95 % who are paying taxes and see shopping as a reward for effort, not as some sort of "noble act' which brain dead numpties like yourself seem to think it is