Australian Politics Forum - Turnbull Rules Out Nuclear

____

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 33410
Australia
Gender: male

Re: Turnbull Rules Out Nuclear
Reply #15 - Oct 30^th, 2015 at 4:47pm

Jovial Monk wrote on Oct 30^th, 2015 at 4:43pm:

So, you don’t actually know what is involved in “baseload solar.” So your uninformed, outdated views on modern nuclear generators can be discarded.

Typical Green, all slogans, stunts and empty rhetoric. Know nothing.

I have no interest in pretending I am an expert in the technical side ... unlike you who pretends you think there are no risks with nuclear.

I have posted articles on baseload solar (latest was yesterday) which you chose to ignore. No point in throwing pearls before swines.

Back to top

IP Logged

mariacostel

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 7344
Sydney
Gender: female

Re: Turnbull Rules Out Nuclear
Reply #16 - Oct 30^th, 2015 at 5:15pm

____ wrote on Oct 30^th, 2015 at 4:43pm:

mariacostel wrote on Oct 30^th, 2015 at 4:34pm:

____ wrote on Oct 30^th, 2015 at 4:13pm:

Jovial Monk wrote on Oct 30^th, 2015 at 4:05pm:

____ wrote on Oct 30^th, 2015 at 3:45pm:

Dumbing down still.

There are more choices than the old and dirty tech of coal and nukes.

i.e baseload solar.
Something that doesn't have the opposition to it like coal and nukes have.

“Baseload solar” just trips off the tongue, doesn’t it? What will in fact be needed? Any idea?

Nuke for heavy, industrial power use, distributed solar for residential and light commercial.

Glad Turnbull hasn’t ruled out nuclear, now to see what the SA enquiry will find.

You pretend to care about saving the planet from human caused climate change yet hate baseload solar.

What's your agenda. Financial interest in dirty tech, like nukes.

And your agenda is to oppose... everything. I bet you drive a fossil fuel car and use electricity from coal-powered plants. Come back when you get your life TRULY green.

Unsustainable methods do not fit longterm goals of bringing heaven to earth. As a heathen, your goals are different. i.e destroying god's creation for a short term dollar.

This issue is a spiritual issue. When you understand this ... then you will understand.

You dont believe in God. You are an atheist.

Back to top

IP Logged

Jovial Monk Gold Member Offline Dogs not cats! Posts: 47794 Gender:	Re: Turnbull Rules Out Nuclear Reply #17 - Oct 30^th, 2015 at 5:22pm Atheists can have spiritual feelings. Longy you are ignorant of a great many things.
Back to top	Get the vaxx! 💉💉 If you don’t like abortions ignore them like you do school shootings. IP Logged

Jovial Monk

Gold Member

Offline

Dogs not cats!

Posts: 47794
Gender: male

Re: Turnbull Rules Out Nuclear
Reply #18 - Oct 30^th, 2015 at 5:24pm

____ wrote on Oct 30^th, 2015 at 4:47pm:

Jovial Monk wrote on Oct 30^th, 2015 at 4:43pm:

So, you don’t actually know what is involved in “baseload solar.” So your uninformed, outdated views on modern nuclear generators can be discarded.

Typical Green, all slogans, stunts and empty rhetoric. Know nothing.

I have no interest in pretending I am an expert in the technical side ... unlike you who pretends you think there are no risks with nuclear.

I have posted articles on baseload solar (latest was yesterday) which you chose to ignore. No point in throwing pearls before swines.

That is a cop out. You have shown the board you just spout slogans with no understanding.

If you don’t know you can find out and I don’t mean the fine details, just a general understanding. Glib “baseload solar” doesn’t cut it. This is a political discussion board, not a Greens party meeting Cheesy

Back to top

Get the vaxx! 💉💉

If you don’t like abortions ignore them like you do school shootings.

IP Logged

____

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 33410
Australia
Gender: male

Re: Turnbull Rules Out Nuclear
Reply #19 - Oct 30^th, 2015 at 5:25pm

mariacostel wrote on Oct 30^th, 2015 at 5:15pm:

____ wrote on Oct 30^th, 2015 at 4:43pm:

mariacostel wrote on Oct 30^th, 2015 at 4:34pm:

____ wrote on Oct 30^th, 2015 at 4:13pm:

Jovial Monk wrote on Oct 30^th, 2015 at 4:05pm:

____ wrote on Oct 30^th, 2015 at 3:45pm:

Dumbing down still.

There are more choices than the old and dirty tech of coal and nukes.

i.e baseload solar.
Something that doesn't have the opposition to it like coal and nukes have.

“Baseload solar” just trips off the tongue, doesn’t it? What will in fact be needed? Any idea?

Nuke for heavy, industrial power use, distributed solar for residential and light commercial.

Glad Turnbull hasn’t ruled out nuclear, now to see what the SA enquiry will find.

You pretend to care about saving the planet from human caused climate change yet hate baseload solar.

What's your agenda. Financial interest in dirty tech, like nukes.

And your agenda is to oppose... everything. I bet you drive a fossil fuel car and use electricity from coal-powered plants. Come back when you get your life TRULY green.

Unsustainable methods do not fit longterm goals of bringing heaven to earth. As a heathen, your goals are different. i.e destroying god's creation for a short term dollar.

This issue is a spiritual issue. When you understand this ... then you will understand.

You dont believe in God. You are an atheist.

Wrong again.
And since you are reasonably new here, what trickery are you hiding. As a heathen, are you using witchcraft to try and fill your gaping hole in your knowledge base?

Only a heathen would want to destroy god's creation the way you want to.

Back to top

IP Logged

mariacostel

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 7344
Sydney
Gender: female

Re: Turnbull Rules Out Nuclear
Reply #20 - Oct 30^th, 2015 at 6:58pm

____ wrote on Oct 30^th, 2015 at 5:25pm:

mariacostel wrote on Oct 30^th, 2015 at 5:15pm:

____ wrote on Oct 30^th, 2015 at 4:43pm:

mariacostel wrote on Oct 30^th, 2015 at 4:34pm:

____ wrote on Oct 30^th, 2015 at 4:13pm:

Jovial Monk wrote on Oct 30^th, 2015 at 4:05pm:

____ wrote on Oct 30^th, 2015 at 3:45pm:

Dumbing down still.

There are more choices than the old and dirty tech of coal and nukes.

i.e baseload solar.
Something that doesn't have the opposition to it like coal and nukes have.

“Baseload solar” just trips off the tongue, doesn’t it? What will in fact be needed? Any idea?

Nuke for heavy, industrial power use, distributed solar for residential and light commercial.

Glad Turnbull hasn’t ruled out nuclear, now to see what the SA enquiry will find.

You pretend to care about saving the planet from human caused climate change yet hate baseload solar.

What's your agenda. Financial interest in dirty tech, like nukes.

And your agenda is to oppose... everything. I bet you drive a fossil fuel car and use electricity from coal-powered plants. Come back when you get your life TRULY green.

Unsustainable methods do not fit longterm goals of bringing heaven to earth. As a heathen, your goals are different. i.e destroying god's creation for a short term dollar.

This issue is a spiritual issue. When you understand this ... then you will understand.

You dont believe in God. You are an atheist.

Wrong again.
And since you are reasonably new here, what trickery are you hiding. As a heathen, are you using witchcraft to try and fill your gaping hole in your knowledge base?

Only a heathen would want to destroy god's creation the way you want to.

Wow you are insane. Have you ever in your entire life answered a question with a relevant answer? I bet you cannot even answer how old you are. It is probably against your code of conduct to answer such things plus, you probably don't know.

Back to top

IP Logged

____

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 33410
Australia
Gender: male

Re: Turnbull Rules Out Nuclear
Reply #21 - Oct 30^th, 2015 at 7:03pm

mariacostel wrote on Oct 30^th, 2015 at 6:58pm:

____ wrote on Oct 30^th, 2015 at 5:25pm:

mariacostel wrote on Oct 30^th, 2015 at 5:15pm:

____ wrote on Oct 30^th, 2015 at 4:43pm:

mariacostel wrote on Oct 30^th, 2015 at 4:34pm:

____ wrote on Oct 30^th, 2015 at 4:13pm:

Jovial Monk wrote on Oct 30^th, 2015 at 4:05pm:

____ wrote on Oct 30^th, 2015 at 3:45pm:

Dumbing down still.

There are more choices than the old and dirty tech of coal and nukes.

i.e baseload solar.
Something that doesn't have the opposition to it like coal and nukes have.

“Baseload solar” just trips off the tongue, doesn’t it? What will in fact be needed? Any idea?

Nuke for heavy, industrial power use, distributed solar for residential and light commercial.

Glad Turnbull hasn’t ruled out nuclear, now to see what the SA enquiry will find.

You pretend to care about saving the planet from human caused climate change yet hate baseload solar.

What's your agenda. Financial interest in dirty tech, like nukes.

And your agenda is to oppose... everything. I bet you drive a fossil fuel car and use electricity from coal-powered plants. Come back when you get your life TRULY green.

Unsustainable methods do not fit longterm goals of bringing heaven to earth. As a heathen, your goals are different. i.e destroying god's creation for a short term dollar.

This issue is a spiritual issue. When you understand this ... then you will understand.

You dont believe in God. You are an atheist.

Wrong again.
And since you are reasonably new here, what trickery are you hiding. As a heathen, are you using witchcraft to try and fill your gaping hole in your knowledge base?

Only a heathen would want to destroy god's creation the way you want to.

Wow you are insane. Have you ever in your entire life answered a question with a relevant answer? I bet you cannot even answer how old you are. It is probably against your code of conduct to answer such things plus, you probably don't know.

Fire with fire.
So why do you hate the environment so much. Did you stub your toe on a rock when you were a smaller girl?

Back to top

IP Logged

mariacostel

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 7344
Sydney
Gender: female

Re: Turnbull Rules Out Nuclear
Reply #22 - Oct 30^th, 2015 at 7:06pm

____ wrote on Oct 30^th, 2015 at 7:03pm:

mariacostel wrote on Oct 30^th, 2015 at 6:58pm:

____ wrote on Oct 30^th, 2015 at 5:25pm:

mariacostel wrote on Oct 30^th, 2015 at 5:15pm:

____ wrote on Oct 30^th, 2015 at 4:43pm:

mariacostel wrote on Oct 30^th, 2015 at 4:34pm:

____ wrote on Oct 30^th, 2015 at 4:13pm:

Jovial Monk wrote on Oct 30^th, 2015 at 4:05pm:

____ wrote on Oct 30^th, 2015 at 3:45pm:

Dumbing down still.

There are more choices than the old and dirty tech of coal and nukes.

i.e baseload solar.
Something that doesn't have the opposition to it like coal and nukes have.

“Baseload solar” just trips off the tongue, doesn’t it? What will in fact be needed? Any idea?

Nuke for heavy, industrial power use, distributed solar for residential and light commercial.

Glad Turnbull hasn’t ruled out nuclear, now to see what the SA enquiry will find.

You pretend to care about saving the planet from human caused climate change yet hate baseload solar.

What's your agenda. Financial interest in dirty tech, like nukes.

And your agenda is to oppose... everything. I bet you drive a fossil fuel car and use electricity from coal-powered plants. Come back when you get your life TRULY green.

Unsustainable methods do not fit longterm goals of bringing heaven to earth. As a heathen, your goals are different. i.e destroying god's creation for a short term dollar.

This issue is a spiritual issue. When you understand this ... then you will understand.

You dont believe in God. You are an atheist.

Wrong again.
And since you are reasonably new here, what trickery are you hiding. As a heathen, are you using witchcraft to try and fill your gaping hole in your knowledge base?

Only a heathen would want to destroy god's creation the way you want to.

Wow you are insane. Have you ever in your entire life answered a question with a relevant answer? I bet you cannot even answer how old you are. It is probably against your code of conduct to answer such things plus, you probably don't know.

Fire with fire.
So why do you hate the environment so much. Did you stub your toe on a rock when you were a smaller girl?

WHY DO YOU HATE PEOPLE SO MUCH? Why do you hate knowledge and science so much? Did you parents drop you on your head?

Back to top

IP Logged

____

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 33410
Australia
Gender: male

Re: Turnbull Rules Out Nuclear
Reply #23 - Oct 30^th, 2015 at 7:14pm

mariacostel wrote on Oct 30^th, 2015 at 7:06pm:

____ wrote on Oct 30^th, 2015 at 7:03pm:

mariacostel wrote on Oct 30^th, 2015 at 6:58pm:

____ wrote on Oct 30^th, 2015 at 5:25pm:

mariacostel wrote on Oct 30^th, 2015 at 5:15pm:

____ wrote on Oct 30^th, 2015 at 4:43pm:

mariacostel wrote on Oct 30^th, 2015 at 4:34pm:

____ wrote on Oct 30^th, 2015 at 4:13pm:

Jovial Monk wrote on Oct 30^th, 2015 at 4:05pm:

____ wrote on Oct 30^th, 2015 at 3:45pm:

Dumbing down still.

There are more choices than the old and dirty tech of coal and nukes.

i.e baseload solar.
Something that doesn't have the opposition to it like coal and nukes have.

“Baseload solar” just trips off the tongue, doesn’t it? What will in fact be needed? Any idea?

Nuke for heavy, industrial power use, distributed solar for residential and light commercial.

Glad Turnbull hasn’t ruled out nuclear, now to see what the SA enquiry will find.

You pretend to care about saving the planet from human caused climate change yet hate baseload solar.

What's your agenda. Financial interest in dirty tech, like nukes.

And your agenda is to oppose... everything. I bet you drive a fossil fuel car and use electricity from coal-powered plants. Come back when you get your life TRULY green.

Unsustainable methods do not fit longterm goals of bringing heaven to earth. As a heathen, your goals are different. i.e destroying god's creation for a short term dollar.

This issue is a spiritual issue. When you understand this ... then you will understand.

You dont believe in God. You are an atheist.

Wrong again.
And since you are reasonably new here, what trickery are you hiding. As a heathen, are you using witchcraft to try and fill your gaping hole in your knowledge base?

Only a heathen would want to destroy god's creation the way you want to.

Wow you are insane. Have you ever in your entire life answered a question with a relevant answer? I bet you cannot even answer how old you are. It is probably against your code of conduct to answer such things plus, you probably don't know.

Fire with fire.
So why do you hate the environment so much. Did you stub your toe on a rock when you were a smaller girl?

WHY DO YOU HATE PEOPLE SO MUCH? Why do you hate knowledge and science so much? Did you parents drop you on your head?

Shouting. Feel you can't compete with the grown ups?
Is this why you want to pull the rug out from under humanity by destroying the environment. Or is it just greed driving you?

Back to top

IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded

Gold Member

Offline

MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966

Re: Turnbull Rules Out Nuclear
Reply #24 - Oct 31^st, 2015 at 3:01pm

Jovial Monk wrote on Oct 30^th, 2015 at 4:33pm:

I will ask again.

What do you think will be needed for “baseload solar?” How many stations, how many Km a side each would need to be, where to site, how to get the power to where it is needed?

So—any idea at all what is involved or are you just mouthing slogans?

A square with sides of approximately 500km could do it theoretically.

In truth you need co-generation. The practicalities of getting it to market dictate that fossil fuels will always play a role and in the bigger populations nuclear will never disappear.

Back to top

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) *

IP Logged

Jovial Monk

Gold Member

Offline

Dogs not cats!

Posts: 47794
Gender: male

Re: Turnbull Rules Out Nuclear
Reply #25 - Oct 31^st, 2015 at 4:30pm

500Km a side. That would use up several supertankers worth of steel and the emissions released in making, transporting and assembling the millions of kilometres of steel tubing etc etc would be horrendous. The environment where it is erected would be destroyed: roads, housing for workers, airstrip, offices, computer centre etc etc etc. Then ultra high voltage DC lines need to be built etc etc etc.

“Baseload solar” just trips off the tongue, doesn’t it, Greens_Win. Pity the reality is very, very different.

Nuclear isn’t cheap but more realistic than just saying blithely “baseload solar.”

But then the Greens don’t give two figs for the environment.

Back to top

Get the vaxx! 💉💉

If you don’t like abortions ignore them like you do school shootings.

IP Logged