Australian Politics Forum - In the case of deletings

He Man

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 1159
Gender: male

Re: In the case of deletings
Reply #60 - Oct 31^st, 2015 at 8:59pm

Unlike historical evidence of saints and prophets from other religions around the world, there are no historical evidence of a ‘prophet’ named Muhammad, a Quran or Islam to have existed anywhere near the Middle Eastern region during his assumed lifetime (570-632 AD). The earliest historical mention, and very short and brief, only appear over 100 years after his death.

Says it all really.

If you could be bothered watching of course peeps.

Back to top

IP Logged

mothra Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 35565 Gender:	Re: In the case of deletings Reply #61 - Oct 31^st, 2015 at 9:01pm He Man wrote on Oct 31^st, 2015 at 8:59pm: If you could be bothered watching of course peeps. It's been disproved. Catch up.
Back to top	If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning. IP Logged

polite_gandalf

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male

Re: In the case of deletings
Reply #62 - Oct 31^st, 2015 at 9:04pm

He Man wrote on Oct 31^st, 2015 at 8:52pm:

Yeah after his death, did he rise from the dead too Grin

Still nothing Roll Eyes

Indeed after his death - and less than 60 years after his death. Thats what you were mocking me about remember? No mention of Muhammad until 60 years after his death, thats what you claimed - shall I quote it back for you? You also repeatedly claimed my source made no mention of Muhammad by name - stupidly thinking it was a completely separate source. This was despite already having quoted the source mentioning Muhammad.

Shall we tally up the number of idiotic mistakes you have made in this thread alone?

Back to top

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:

Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.

IP Logged

He Man Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 1159 Gender:	Re: In the case of deletings Reply #63 - Oct 31^st, 2015 at 9:06pm Hmmm you said thanks for bringing that up yet the prophet was marching in an army after his death Still no evidence mohammed even existed 60 years after his death.
Back to top	IP Logged

He Man Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 1159 Gender:	Re: In the case of deletings Reply #64 - Oct 31^st, 2015 at 9:08pm mothra wrote on Oct 31^st, 2015 at 9:01pm: Catch up. Go back to sleep troll.
Back to top	IP Logged

mothra Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 35565 Gender:	Re: In the case of deletings Reply #65 - Oct 31^st, 2015 at 9:11pm He Man wrote on Oct 31^st, 2015 at 9:08pm: mothra wrote on Oct 31^st, 2015 at 9:01pm: Catch up. Go back to sleep troll. You're breathtakingly unaware of how a big a fool you are making of yourself, aren''t you?
Back to top	If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning. IP Logged

polite_gandalf

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male

Re: In the case of deletings
Reply #66 - Oct 31^st, 2015 at 9:12pm

He Man wrote on Oct 31^st, 2015 at 9:06pm:

Still no evidence mohammed even existed 60 years after his death

Good point - its unlikely Muhammad existed 60 years after his death.

There is nontheless evidence of his existence less than 60 years after his death - as pointed out - firstly, the Syrian fragment mentioning Muhammad by name, then the Doctrina Jacobi, mentioning a "false prophet" leading the Saracens. Your continued efforts to deny this evidence makes you even more of a parody than you were before (which amazingly, is actually possible).

Back to top

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:

Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.

IP Logged

He Man

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 1159
Gender: male

Re: In the case of deletings
Reply #67 - Oct 31^st, 2015 at 9:13pm

polite_gandalf wrote on Oct 31^st, 2015 at 9:04pm:

He Man wrote on Oct 31^st, 2015 at 8:52pm:

Yeah after his death, did he rise from the dead too Grin

Still nothing Roll Eyes

Indeed after his death - and less than 60 years after his death. Thats what you were mocking me about remember? No mention of Muhammad until 60 years after his death, thats what you claimed - shall I quote it back for you? You also repeatedly claimed my source made no mention of Muhammad by name - stupidly thinking it was a completely separate source. This was despite already having quoted the source mentioning Muhammad.

Shall we tally up the number of idiotic mistakes you have made in this thread alone?

Here is the summation of your proof mohammed existed.

" It is worthwhile cautioning that the condition of the text is fragmentary and many of the readings unclear or disputable."

Yah mate you have evidence.

Even if it was true where is all the evidence while he was alive and so called conquering Grin

Pull ease try harder.

By your analogy you reckon you have evidence mohammed the head of islam existed 5 years after his death. Roll Eyes

Then for another 60 years not a peep. PULL EASE

Pull the other one.

Got anything else ?

Anything at all ? NOPE didn't think so. Roll Eyes

Back to top

IP Logged

He Man

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 1159
Gender: male

Re: In the case of deletings
Reply #68 - Oct 31^st, 2015 at 9:14pm

polite_gandalf wrote on Oct 31^st, 2015 at 9:12pm:

He Man wrote on Oct 31^st, 2015 at 9:06pm:

Still no evidence mohammed even existed 60 years after his death

Good point - its unlikely Muhammad existed 60 years after his death.

There is nontheless evidence of his existence less than 60 years after his death - as pointed out - firstly, the Syrian fragment mentioning Muhammad by name, then the Doctrina Jacobi, mentioning a "false prophet" leading the Saracens. Your continued efforts to deny this evidence makes you even more of a parody than you were before (which amazingly, is actually possible).

You are having problems understanding that doesn't prove Mohamed the prophet of islam existed at all.

Deal with it gawd. Roll Eyes

Back to top

IP Logged

He Man Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 1159 Gender:	Re: In the case of deletings Reply #69 - Oct 31^st, 2015 at 9:15pm Geez man you can't be this, well shall we say .....
Back to top	IP Logged

polite_gandalf

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male

Re: In the case of deletings
Reply #70 - Oct 31^st, 2015 at 9:19pm

Lets pause for a score check:

number of He Man's idiotic claims that have been exposed so far:

1. There is no known evidence of Muhammad existing that is less than 60 years after his death
2. The Syrian fragment contains no mention of Muhammad by name
3. The Syrian fragment is actually the Doctrina Jacobi
4. The Doctrina Jacobi, mentioning a false prophet leading the saracens around the time of Muhammad, somehow isn't evidence of Muhammad's existence
5. unlike Muhammad, there is contemporary evidence supporting the existence of Jesus

Anything else?

Back to top

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:

Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.

IP Logged

polite_gandalf

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male

Re: In the case of deletings
Reply #71 - Oct 31^st, 2015 at 9:20pm

He Man wrote on Oct 31^st, 2015 at 9:14pm:

polite_gandalf wrote on Oct 31^st, 2015 at 9:12pm:

He Man wrote on Oct 31^st, 2015 at 9:06pm:

Still no evidence mohammed even existed 60 years after his death

Good point - its unlikely Muhammad existed 60 years after his death.

There is nontheless evidence of his existence less than 60 years after his death - as pointed out - firstly, the Syrian fragment mentioning Muhammad by name, then the Doctrina Jacobi, mentioning a "false prophet" leading the Saracens. Your continued efforts to deny this evidence makes you even more of a parody than you were before (which amazingly, is actually possible).

You are having problems understanding that doesn't prove Mohamed the prophet of islam existed at all.

Deal with it gawd. Roll Eyes

So we're twisting from "No mention of Muhammad by name" - to "well it doesn't prove Muhammad existed"

Keep squirming bro, its hilarious

Back to top

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:

Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.

IP Logged

He Man

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 1159
Gender: male

Re: In the case of deletings
Reply #72 - Oct 31^st, 2015 at 9:24pm

polite_gandalf wrote on Oct 31^st, 2015 at 9:20pm:

He Man wrote on Oct 31^st, 2015 at 9:14pm:

polite_gandalf wrote on Oct 31^st, 2015 at 9:12pm:

He Man wrote on Oct 31^st, 2015 at 9:06pm:

Still no evidence mohammed even existed 60 years after his death

Good point - its unlikely Muhammad existed 60 years after his death.

There is nontheless evidence of his existence less than 60 years after his death - as pointed out - firstly, the Syrian fragment mentioning Muhammad by name, then the Doctrina Jacobi, mentioning a "false prophet" leading the Saracens. Your continued efforts to deny this evidence makes you even more of a parody than you were before (which amazingly, is actually possible).

You are having problems understanding that doesn't prove Mohamed the prophet of islam existed at all.

Deal with it gawd. Roll Eyes

So we're twisting from "No mention of Muhammad by name" - to "well it doesn't prove Muhammad existed"

Keep squirming bro, its hilarious

Squirming, Grin

you are a hoot.

You still have not proven mohammed existed with anything at all yet. You do understand that don't you it aint hard. Grin

All you have done is squirmed and tried to change the subject. Then grasped at some fragmentary manuscript. Hilarious.

Got anything else ? Seriously ?

Even about the Quran that would be a hoot bet ya don't go there.

Anything on the Qu'ran Grin

Thought not.

Still nothing NADA, ZIP. Roll Eyes

Back to top

IP Logged

polite_gandalf

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male

Re: In the case of deletings
Reply #73 - Oct 31^st, 2015 at 9:47pm

He Man wrote on Oct 31^st, 2015 at 9:24pm:

You still have not proven mohammed existed with anything at all yet. You do understand that don't you it aint hard.

Do you understand there is a difference between evidence and proof? You can't use the two words interchangeably.

He Man wrote on Oct 31^st, 2015 at 9:24pm:

Still nothing NADA, ZIP.

Except of course the source that mentions Muhammad by name - that you thought was the Doctrina Jacobi. You haven't forgotton already have you?

Back to top

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:

Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.

IP Logged

He Man

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 1159
Gender: male

Re: In the case of deletings
Reply #74 - Oct 31^st, 2015 at 9:49pm

polite_gandalf wrote on Oct 31^st, 2015 at 9:47pm:

He Man wrote on Oct 31^st, 2015 at 9:24pm:

You still have not proven mohammed existed with anything at all yet. You do understand that don't you it aint hard.

Do you understand there is a difference between evidence and proof? You can't use the two words interchangeably.

He Man wrote on Oct 31^st, 2015 at 9:24pm:

Still nothing NADA, ZIP.

Except of course the source that mentions Muhammad by name - that you thought was the Doctrina Jacobi. You haven't forgotton already have you?

Muhammad the head of Islam Ooo does it where ? Grin

Back to top

IP Logged