mariacostel wrote on Nov 1
st, 2015 at 5:38pm:
Kiron22 wrote on Nov 1
st, 2015 at 1:06pm:
Old enough to work, old enough to vote. Doesn't matter how many.
Again, I fail to see any legitimate arguments against moving the age down to 16. Teens today are quite politically informed.
Also Teens who don't want to vote DON'T HAVE TO VOTE, everyone has the freedom to register when they wish.
You can work at 13 so why not have voting at 13?
Old enough to work, old enough to vote, though I doubt a 13 year old will be paying any tax.
Again, something has to be done to improve political participation of Youth, lowering the voting age is the easy solution.
Not a single one of you have brought up a single relevant point that can't be extended to most adults.
Most adults aren't part of the army, most adults don't own property, most adults don't know anything about Politics.
Why should the young be underrepresented and subject to the tyranny of those retiring? Why should a 60 year old decide the future of not only a 16 year old, but essentially anyone <30?
How about we just give <30 two votes then? Surely that will even things out because the way demographics are at the moment.
50+ voters: 7.2 million
18-35 voters: 2.4 million.
How is that in any way fair? That is complete and utter generational tyranny.