Australian Politics Forum - Nobel Laureate pans Climate Change

Maqqa Gold Member Offline 14% - that low?! Posts: 16000	Re: Nobel Laureate pans Climate Change Reply #15 - Nov 4^th, 2015 at 5:51pm FFS people Why should we listen to a nobel prize laureate when we can blindly follow the rants of the Australian Greens They are leading us to the promise land where we all eat steaks that doesn't come from cows
Back to top	Bill 14% is not the alcohol content of that wine. It's your poll number IP Logged

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 17967 Gender:	Re: Nobel Laureate pans Climate Change Reply #16 - Nov 4^th, 2015 at 5:52pm My credentials ? I'm not a climate scientist either.
Back to top	IP Logged

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 17967 Gender:	Re: Nobel Laureate pans Climate Change Reply #17 - Nov 4^th, 2015 at 6:13pm BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Nov 4^th, 2015 at 5:37pm: It's more weightless gas you snapstick Smog is a weightless gas?
Back to top	IP Logged

Kytro

Gold Member

Offline

Blasphemy: a victimless
crime

Posts: 3409
Adelaide
Gender: male

Re: Nobel Laureate pans Climate Change
Reply #18 - Nov 4^th, 2015 at 6:13pm

cods wrote on Nov 4^th, 2015 at 4:56pm:

ah at last someone with Integrity and Conscience...

right or wrong.. he resigned from all the crappola...

you can fool some of the people some of the time but!!!!..

and to claim there is one source and one source only for changing anything on this planet... is a kind of madness in itself..

Nobody is claiming that, it's damn strawman.

Back to top

IP Logged

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 17967 Gender:	Re: Nobel Laureate pans Climate Change Reply #19 - Nov 4^th, 2015 at 6:18pm Kytro wrote on Nov 4^th, 2015 at 6:13pm: Nobody is claiming that, it's damn strawman. Ahh, the resident expert on strawmen.
Back to top	IP Logged

Its time

Gold Member

Offline

Boot libs out

Posts: 25639
Gender: female

Re: Nobel Laureate pans Climate Change
Reply #20 - Nov 4^th, 2015 at 7:00pm

mariacostel wrote on Nov 4^th, 2015 at 5:12pm:

Its time wrote on Nov 4^th, 2015 at 5:05pm:

What if it is one big hoax , and we make the world a better place to live . For nothing.

Clean air is overated anyway Cheesy

CO2 isn't 'dirty'. That's kinda the point.

What if it is one big hoax and we spend trillions of dollars trying (and failing) to fix a non-existent problem while billions die of starvation?

Starvation is over-rated anyway.

How is embracing clean energy supplies and reducing pollution creating starvation ?

Back to top

IP Logged

Armchair_Politician

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 26214
Gender: male

Re: Nobel Laureate pans Climate Change
Reply #21 - Nov 4^th, 2015 at 7:12pm

Its time wrote on Nov 4^th, 2015 at 5:05pm:

What if it is one big hoax , and we make the world a better place to live . For nothing.

Clean air is overated anyway Cheesy

I have no problem making the world a cleaner, better place. I do have a problem with us going broke and being driven into poverty or rushing into using unreliable renewable energy sources on a mass scale that leads to problems such as an unreliable power grid. The global warming church would have us believe that an enormous calamity is just around the corner if we don't shut down all coal power yesterday. The truth is even if we did, it would still be about 150 years for changes to be noticeable in the atmosphere.

Back to top

IP Logged

Armchair_Politician

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 26214
Gender: male

Re: Nobel Laureate pans Climate Change
Reply #22 - Nov 4^th, 2015 at 7:13pm

Its time wrote on Nov 4^th, 2015 at 7:00pm:

mariacostel wrote on Nov 4^th, 2015 at 5:12pm:

Its time wrote on Nov 4^th, 2015 at 5:05pm:

What if it is one big hoax , and we make the world a better place to live . For nothing.

Clean air is overated anyway Cheesy

CO2 isn't 'dirty'. That's kinda the point.

What if it is one big hoax and we spend trillions of dollars trying (and failing) to fix a non-existent problem while billions die of starvation?

Starvation is over-rated anyway.

How is embracing clean energy supplies and reducing pollution creating starvation ?

by doing it in an economically irresponsible way, it can very easily lead to poverty, etc.

Back to top

IP Logged

mariacostel Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 7344 Sydney Gender:	Re: Nobel Laureate pans Climate Change Reply #23 - Nov 4^th, 2015 at 7:26pm It is really quite awesomely hilarious watching some of you clowns dismiss the opinions of Nobel Laureates in Physics no less just because they disagree with ignorant, uneducated dopes like Gore.
Back to top	IP Logged

mariacostel

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 7344
Sydney
Gender: female

Re: Nobel Laureate pans Climate Change
Reply #24 - Nov 4^th, 2015 at 7:28pm

Kiron22 wrote on Nov 4^th, 2015 at 5:29pm:

Is he a climate scientist? No. Next.

There is no qualification called 'climate scientist' There is no degree in climate science. There are a large number of disciplines that interconnect to form climate science. And yet the loudest noises come from POLITICAL scientists, economist and politicians.

Back to top

IP Logged

Its time Gold Member Offline Boot libs out Posts: 25639 Gender:	Re: Nobel Laureate pans Climate Change Reply #25 - Nov 4^th, 2015 at 8:16pm .
Back to top	IP Logged

Its time Gold Member Offline Boot libs out Posts: 25639 Gender:	Re: Nobel Laureate pans Climate Change Reply #26 - Nov 4^th, 2015 at 8:20pm What is the problem with embracing clean energy and reducing pollution , minus the hyperbole ?
Back to top	IP Logged

Its time

Gold Member

Offline

Boot libs out

Posts: 25639
Gender: female

Re: Nobel Laureate pans Climate Change
Reply #27 - Nov 4^th, 2015 at 8:22pm

Armchair_Politician wrote on Nov 4^th, 2015 at 7:12pm:

Its time wrote on Nov 4^th, 2015 at 5:05pm:

What if it is one big hoax , and we make the world a better place to live . For nothing.

Clean air is overated anyway Cheesy

I have no problem making the world a cleaner, better place. I do have a problem with us going broke and being driven into poverty or rushing into using unreliable renewable energy sources on a mass scale that leads to problems such as an unreliable power grid. The global warming church would have us believe that an enormous calamity is just around the corner if we don't shut down all coal power yesterday. The truth is even if we did, it would still be about 150 years for changes to be noticeable in the atmosphere.

So we dont think of our great grandkids future ? What is it with conservatives and its all about me attitude?

Back to top

IP Logged

lee

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17967
Gender: male

Re: Nobel Laureate pans Climate Change
Reply #28 - Nov 4^th, 2015 at 8:31pm

Its time wrote on Nov 4^th, 2015 at 8:20pm:

What is the problem with embracing clean energy and reducing pollution , minus the hyperbole ?

We have reduced pollution mightily since the 70's.

We have more people suffering from asthma in spite of this cleaner atmosphere. Studies have suggested his may be due to "super" cleaning agents, so that children do not get exposed as much at home. It may be being exacerbated by children not playing outside as much any more; and thus getting exposed to toxins outdoors.

Back to top

IP Logged

Kytro Gold Member Offline Blasphemy: a victimless crime Posts: 3409 Adelaide Gender:	Re: Nobel Laureate pans Climate Change Reply #29 - Nov 4^th, 2015 at 8:43pm lee wrote on Nov 4^th, 2015 at 6:18pm: Kytro wrote on Nov 4^th, 2015 at 6:13pm: Nobody is claiming that, it's damn strawman. Ahh, the resident expert on strawmen. Sorry I just get frustrated when people attack positions that are really what is being claimed.
Back to top	IP Logged