Australian Politics Forum - Nobel Laureate pans Climate Change

mariacostel

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 7344
Sydney
Gender: female

Re: Nobel Laureate pans Climate Change
Reply #45 - Nov 5^th, 2015 at 8:08am

Kytro wrote on Nov 4^th, 2015 at 8:45pm:

mariacostel wrote on Nov 4^th, 2015 at 7:26pm:

It is really quite awesomely hilarious watching some of you clowns dismiss the opinions of Nobel Laureates in Physics no less just because they disagree with ignorant, uneducated dopes like Gore.

Well it isn't his area of expertise, but at least he does understand science so that's a plus. Like I said there are detractors in every field.

Physics is an integral part of climate science. He is more than qualified to comment. BTW there is no qualification called 'climate scientist'.

Back to top

IP Logged

mariacostel

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 7344
Sydney
Gender: female

Re: Nobel Laureate pans Climate Change
Reply #46 - Nov 5^th, 2015 at 8:12am

philperth2010 wrote on Nov 4^th, 2015 at 8:50pm:

No Governments are listening to the deniers are they....Ask yourself why???

http://littlegreenfootballs.com/page/257775_Ivar_Giaevers_links_to_Exxon_M

Roll Eyes

So out with the character assassination and from such a reliable source as a website built in a guys basement.

But even more important is the refusal to permit anyone to have a contrary opinion without claiming they are paid for it. Why would a Nobel laureate do that? Why would he need to? His reputation is his most valuable asset and perhaps - just perhaps - he actually BELIEVES what he says.

But, we can't have this no, can we?

Back to top

IP Logged

mariacostel Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 7344 Sydney Gender:	Re: Nobel Laureate pans Climate Change Reply #47 - Nov 5^th, 2015 at 12:22pm A thread about Al Gore would get the climate hysterics salivating... but a Nobel Laureate in physics??? Maybe he should have claimed to have invented the internet.
Back to top	IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded Gold Member Offline MediocrityNET: because people died for this! Posts: 26966	Re: Nobel Laureate pans Climate Change Reply #48 - Nov 5^th, 2015 at 3:30pm lee wrote on Nov 4^th, 2015 at 9:21pm: Jovial Monk wrote on Nov 4^th, 2015 at 9:14pm: Back to GHG's. The earth is not a greenhouse. So why aren't we all freezing?
Back to top	Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded

Gold Member

Offline

MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966

Re: Nobel Laureate pans Climate Change
Reply #49 - Nov 5^th, 2015 at 3:34pm

lee wrote on Nov 4^th, 2015 at 9:10pm:

Its time wrote on Nov 4^th, 2015 at 8:51pm:

We've reduced it since the 70s so lets stop now?

What is the level of pollution now? What is the cost of getting it cleaner and how much would that expenditure impact health?

The law of diminishing returns.

If you want to talk about a law of diminishing returns than I challenge you to also entertain Jevons Paradox in the same sermon Shocked

You can't because you are a yellow chicken foreign vested interest who hates every single Australian who ever died fighting for this country

Back to top

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) *

IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded

Gold Member

Offline

MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966

Re: Nobel Laureate pans Climate Change
Reply #50 - Nov 5^th, 2015 at 3:35pm

lee wrote on Nov 4^th, 2015 at 9:28pm:

Its time wrote on Nov 4^th, 2015 at 9:25pm:

Your putting a price on clean air, goodness me , it is all about you , Armpit had the foresight to roughly predict the benefits to our future generations, is it their problem is it? You can't see the big picture can you grasshopper

You don't get it do you. As things get cleaner it costs more to get that extra bit cleaner. Where do you want to stop?

Now you want to talk about overheads and the equations of profit Grin

Yeh, you got acumen buddy.... you got the acumen of a crack-smoking daddy smoker Grin

Back to top

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) *

IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded

Gold Member

Offline

MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966

Re: Nobel Laureate pans Climate Change
Reply #51 - Nov 5^th, 2015 at 3:38pm

Jovial Monk wrote on Nov 4^th, 2015 at 8:57pm:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Nov 4^th, 2015 at 7:12pm:

Its time wrote on Nov 4^th, 2015 at 5:05pm:

What if it is one big hoax , and we make the world a better place to live . For nothing.

Clean air is overated anyway Cheesy

I have no problem making the world a cleaner, better place. I do have a problem with us going broke and being driven into poverty or rushing into using unreliable renewable energy sources on a mass scale that leads to problems such as an unreliable power grid. The global warming church would have us believe that an enormous calamity is just around the corner if we don't shut down all coal power yesterday. The truth is even if we did, it would still be about 150 years for changes to be noticeable in the atmosphere.

You have a problem with change. That is what all your posts here add up to. Well, the climate is changing, the globe is warming and we keep pumping GHGs into the atmosphere. That has to change—that dreaded word again!

Armchair has a problem with logic: he may aswell be michael kroger or whatever Grin

Back to top

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) *

IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded

Gold Member

Offline

MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966

Re: Nobel Laureate pans Climate Change
Reply #52 - Nov 5^th, 2015 at 3:41pm

Armchair_Politician wrote on Nov 4^th, 2015 at 7:13pm:

Its time wrote on Nov 4^th, 2015 at 7:00pm:

mariacostel wrote on Nov 4^th, 2015 at 5:12pm:

Its time wrote on Nov 4^th, 2015 at 5:05pm:

What if it is one big hoax , and we make the world a better place to live . For nothing.

Clean air is overated anyway Cheesy

CO2 isn't 'dirty'. That's kinda the point.

What if it is one big hoax and we spend trillions of dollars trying (and failing) to fix a non-existent problem while billions die of starvation?

Starvation is over-rated anyway.

How is embracing clean energy supplies and reducing pollution creating starvation ?

by doing it in an economically irresponsible way, it can very easily lead to poverty, etc.

What is the definition of 'economically irresponsible' ?

Back to top

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) *

IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded Gold Member Offline MediocrityNET: because people died for this! Posts: 26966	Re: Nobel Laureate pans Climate Change Reply #53 - Nov 5^th, 2015 at 3:43pm lee wrote on Nov 4^th, 2015 at 6:18pm: Kytro wrote on Nov 4^th, 2015 at 6:13pm: Nobody is claiming that, it's damn strawman. Ahh, the resident expert on strawmen. says the cods supporter
Back to top	Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded Gold Member Offline MediocrityNET: because people died for this! Posts: 26966	Re: Nobel Laureate pans Climate Change Reply #54 - Nov 5^th, 2015 at 3:45pm lee wrote on Nov 4^th, 2015 at 6:13pm: BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Nov 4^th, 2015 at 5:37pm: It's more weightless gas you snapstick Smog is a weightless gas? You don't even know what smog is mate so take that up your hole
Back to top	Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) IP Logged