mothra wrote on Nov 6
th, 2015 at 1:54pm:
I would not consider a parent reprimanding a child while at a heightened emotional level abuse.
Yep, I understand you might not consider it that, but, by definition it is... The reality for most they do not consider it abuse - the problem is that the word itself is demonised...
It just happens, we do reprimand our kids, that's part of life and at times our reprimand most certainly crosses the lines of abuse and neglect - but we get over it. It is not Chronic.
There are also a myriad of behaviour management techniques now days that work very well without the need for fear of punitive reprisals... Lots of people try to apply them most of the time.
No one gets it right all the time because apart from caring for, protecting and teaching our kids we are also working out how to pay bills, feed families, fix broken taps, get cars in for oil changes, deal with sicknesses and or injuries, worry about what politicians will do to us next and somehow find some time for ourselves as well.
Kids and raising them is just one more complexity in our complex lives.
In a perfect world all kids would be the top priority all of the time, clearly we are in a far from perfect world though.
The definitions are ok still, accepting them is the challenge.
The words are not of themselves demonic, they describe a type of behaviour - the impacts of those behaviours can be widely variable though. New workers and long term poorly supervised jaded workers in Child Protection see abuse in every action, at some level they're right, however, it is not of a serious nature or all that frequent.
mothra wrote on Nov 6
th, 2015 at 1:54pm:
Abuse is the intent to cause harm, or at least lack of due care.
No it isn't, abuse is about improper treatment, at times that might include intent, however, there are times when the person simply does not know any better.
"I was teaching them a lesson..." Whilst this might be a genuine position for an abuser to take, it also signals they have simply not considered the harm part, ergo their intent is not to cause harm...
Lack of due care is neglect.
mothra wrote on Nov 6
th, 2015 at 1:54pm:
Do you think a religious upbringing causes harm?
It can have the potential to is about as far as I would go. Clearly and demonstrably a religious upbringing does not repeatedly or consistently cause harm at any significant level (how much emotional harm might have been caused would be an interesting study).
I am fairly certain that even without further research, religious upbringing has caused harm to some.
However, this religious upbringing idea... So we are telling our children a bunch of mythological stories, some of which are potentially disturbing. The ultimate overseer/s of said stories are generally omnipotent, all knowing entities that have the power to cause them eternal suffering, harm and misery if they don't obey a set of rules they don't yet fully know or understand?
Tell me that's not just a bit abusive.
Before you answer though, try not to make the word abuse demonic in it's meaning...