Australian Politics Forum - Melhem takes one for Shorten?

Dnarever

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 59360
Here
Gender: male

Re: Melhem takes one for Shorten?
Reply #15 - Nov 7^th, 2015 at 6:50am

President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Nov 7^th, 2015 at 5:58am:

Maqqa wrote on Nov 6^th, 2015 at 11:16pm:

The royal commission into Union Corruption will charge Cesar Melham on a number of corruption charges

Mr Melham was Mr Shorten's successor at the AWU

if memory serves me correct... Melham just carried on the work that Bull Shitten had already set up...

although, documentation may have been lost in the shredder... Angry

if memory serves me correct... Melham just carried on the work that Bull Shitten had already set up.

You were there ? It appears that memory hasn't served you very well though this is understandable with it being over 10 years ago. Maybe you should review your meeting notes.

Back to top

IP Logged

Dnarever Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 59360 Here Gender:	Re: Melhem takes one for Shorten? Reply #16 - Nov 7^th, 2015 at 6:53am cods wrote on Nov 7^th, 2015 at 6:24am: Kat wrote on Nov 7^th, 2015 at 6:09am: And the right-wing stupidity just rolls onwards. You are FOOLS. its takes one to know one.. Gee that is a funny admission ? I don't agree with you cods.
Back to top	IP Logged

Armchair_Politician

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 26414
Gender: male

Re: Melhem takes one for Shorten?
Reply #17 - Nov 7^th, 2015 at 10:36am

Kat wrote on Nov 7^th, 2015 at 6:33am:

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Nov 7^th, 2015 at 6:26am:

Shorten found guilty by Ozpolitic 'lawyers'.

Just watch.

Like the pink batts scheme, we'll have this lot whinging for the next 12 months, refusing to accept the umpire's decision.

Yes, after all no one really died in Labors pink batts disaster. No one had their house burn down and no one had their business collapse when Labor abruptly axed the deadly scheme!

Back to top

IP Logged

Its time Gold Member Offline Boot libs out Posts: 25639 Gender:	Re: Melhem takes one for Shorten? Reply #18 - Nov 7^th, 2015 at 11:36am Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Nov 7^th, 2015 at 6:26am: Shorten found guilty by Ozpolitic 'lawyers'. Poor righties , yet another Gillard gotcha moment
Back to top	IP Logged

Jovial Monk

Gold Member

Offline

Dogs not cats!

Posts: 47794
Gender: male

Re: Melhem takes one for Shorten?
Reply #19 - Nov 7^th, 2015 at 11:44am

Armchair_Politician wrote on Nov 7^th, 2015 at 10:36am:

Kat wrote on Nov 7^th, 2015 at 6:33am:

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Nov 7^th, 2015 at 6:26am:

Shorten found guilty by Ozpolitic 'lawyers'.

Just watch.

Like the pink batts scheme, we'll have this lot whinging for the next 12 months, refusing to accept the umpire's decision.

Yes, after all no one really died in Labors pink batts disaster. No one had their house burn down and no one had their business collapse when Labor abruptly axed the deadly scheme!

Considering 1.2m homes were retrofitted with insulation, about 20 years worth of work, there were fewes deaths and fewer fires than if the scheme had not been introduced.

Back to top

Get the vaxx! 💉💉

If you don’t like abortions ignore them like you do school shootings.

IP Logged

lee

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 18021
Gender: male

Re: Melhem takes one for Shorten?
Reply #20 - Nov 7^th, 2015 at 11:54am

Jovial Monk wrote on Nov 7^th, 2015 at 11:44am:

Considering 1.2m homes were retrofitted with insulation, about 20 years worth of work, there were fewes deaths and fewer fires than if the scheme had not been introduced.

Can you show statistics for that? Seeing as the insulation installed was about reducing temperatures - what is the correlation to fires? I have never heard of the sun creating a house fire yet.

Were the deaths produced by AGW?

Back to top

IP Logged

Maqqa Gold Member Offline 14% - that low?! Posts: 16000	Re: Melhem takes one for Shorten? Reply #21 - Nov 7^th, 2015 at 12:45pm Talking about Shorten and shredder Didn't Rudd have a Shreddergate as well?
Back to top	Bill 14% is not the alcohol content of that wine. It's your poll number IP Logged

Maqqa

Gold Member

Offline

14% - that low?!

Posts: 16000

Re: Melhem takes one for Shorten?
Reply #22 - Nov 7^th, 2015 at 12:47pm

Kat wrote on Nov 7^th, 2015 at 6:33am:

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Nov 7^th, 2015 at 6:26am:

Shorten found guilty by Ozpolitic 'lawyers'.

Just watch.

Like the pink batts scheme, we'll have this lot whinging for the next 12 months, refusing to accept the umpire's decision.

But if the decision was the other way - Shuttin would be claiming bias

Back to top

Bill 14% is not the alcohol content of that wine. It's your poll number

IP Logged

Its time

Gold Member

Offline

Boot libs out

Posts: 25639
Gender: female

Re: Melhem takes one for Shorten?
Reply #23 - Nov 7^th, 2015 at 1:55pm

Maqqa wrote on Nov 7^th, 2015 at 12:47pm:

Kat wrote on Nov 7^th, 2015 at 6:33am:

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Nov 7^th, 2015 at 6:26am:

Shorten found guilty by Ozpolitic 'lawyers'.

Just watch.

Like the pink batts scheme, we'll have this lot whinging for the next 12 months, refusing to accept the umpire's decision.

But if the decision was the other way - Shuttin would be claiming bias

Bit of bad luck eh mate, better luck next time Grin

Back to top

IP Logged

Dnarever

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 59360
Here
Gender: male

Re: Melhem takes one for Shorten?
Reply #24 - Nov 7^th, 2015 at 2:03pm

lee wrote on Nov 7^th, 2015 at 11:54am:

Jovial Monk wrote on Nov 7^th, 2015 at 11:44am:

Considering 1.2m homes were retrofitted with insulation, about 20 years worth of work, there were fewes deaths and fewer fires than if the scheme had not been introduced.

Can you show statistics for that? Seeing as the insulation installed was about reducing temperatures - what is the correlation to fires? I have never heard of the sun creating a house fire yet.

Were the deaths produced by AGW?

The problem with fires form these installations was highlighted by the volume of new installations from the scheme.

Prior to this the fires has been occurring at a higher rate for the previous 10 years or more but the lower volume of installations was masking the problem.

The fact that conductive sheets and electricity do not mix well was not a new discovery.

Back to top

IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 38861
Gender: male

Re: Melhem takes one for Shorten?
Reply #25 - Nov 7^th, 2015 at 2:27pm

Maqqa wrote on Nov 6^th, 2015 at 11:16pm:

The royal commission into Union Corruption will charge Cesar Melham on a number of corruption charges

Mr Melham was Mr Shorten's successor at the AWU

The level of ignorance on what a RC can do is mind blowing, even though I have explained it many times. A RC does not have any power to charge anyone. It can make findings and make recommendations, and those are merely administrative. I have used to the Cole RC into the Building and Construction Industry which made adverse findings and recommendations against many people, and not one of them was even charged with any offence, let alone convicted.

Further, the RC has not made any adverse findings against Melham. All that happened on Friday evening was that Jeremy Stoljar, the Barrister Assisting the RC (the Prosecutor, if you like) made submissions urging that the RC make adverse findings.

Back to top

IP Logged

mariacostel Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 7344 Sydney Gender:	Re: Melhem takes one for Shorten? Reply #26 - Nov 7^th, 2015 at 2:54pm You'd be a bit of a DNA (aka fool) to believe Shorten has not been hammered badly by all of this. He was neck deep in shonky and unethical behaviour. And his 17% polls - and dropping - are the evidence.
Back to top	IP Logged

Kytro

Gold Member

Offline

Blasphemy: a victimless
crime

Posts: 3409
Adelaide
Gender: male

Re: Melhem takes one for Shorten?
Reply #27 - Nov 7^th, 2015 at 3:02pm

cods wrote on Nov 7^th, 2015 at 6:06am:

wouldnt it be the first time in history if a leader of one of the top parties in the country was charged with a CRIME?... lets be honest here.. shortarse takes all the credit whenever he can.. but --------------

its the usual case of pass the buck...is anyone surprised..look at THOMO they bent the rules so far I am surprised he hasnt been compensated for his time.. Roll Eyes

.. you just need the right mouthpiece or position..

why would thye try so hard to remove the JUDGE if he didnt have something to answer too..

I dont know who they think they are kidding...it just makes me more and more determined not to vote for either of the bastards....I wouldnt give them the time of day letalone my vote.

Charged with what crime, by whom? As far as I recall this was an investigation, one in which Bill was cleared. To claim that he is somehow guilty and charged with anything is completely irrational and unreasonable.

Back to top

IP Logged

Kytro

Gold Member

Offline

Blasphemy: a victimless
crime

Posts: 3409
Adelaide
Gender: male

Re: Melhem takes one for Shorten?
Reply #28 - Nov 7^th, 2015 at 3:03pm

mariacostel wrote on Nov 7^th, 2015 at 2:54pm:

You'd be a bit of a DNA (aka fool) to believe Shorten has not been hammered badly by all of this. He was neck deep in shonky and unethical behaviour. And his 17% polls - and dropping - are the evidence.

They only thing Shorten had going for him was not being Abbott. Honesty he is a terrible choice for leader, accusations aside.

Back to top

IP Logged

Redmond Neck

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 21722
ACT
Gender: male

Re: Melhem takes one for Shorten?
Reply #29 - Nov 7^th, 2015 at 3:11pm

Kytro wrote on Nov 7^th, 2015 at 3:02pm:

cods wrote on Nov 7^th, 2015 at 6:06am:

wouldnt it be the first time in history if a leader of one of the top parties in the country was charged with a CRIME?... lets be honest here.. shortarse takes all the credit whenever he can.. but --------------

its the usual case of pass the buck...is anyone surprised..look at THOMO they bent the rules so far I am surprised he hasnt been compensated for his time.. Roll Eyes

.. you just need the right mouthpiece or position..

why would thye try so hard to remove the JUDGE if he didnt have something to answer too..

I dont know who they think they are kidding...it just makes me more and more determined not to vote for either of the bastards....I wouldnt give them the time of day letalone my vote.

Charged with what crime, by whom? As far as I recall this was an investigation, one in which Bill was cleared. To claim that he is somehow guilty and charged with anything is completely irrational and unreasonable.

Its OK codsy does go off half cocked at times, despite that she is one of my favourites in any subject except Labor! Grin

Back to top

BAN ALL THESE ABO SITES RECOGNITIONS.

ALL AUSTRALIA IS FOR ALL AUSTRALIANS!

IP Logged